American Water Works Company, Inc. quarterly report, Q3 FY2016

American Water Works Company, Inc. — Q3 2016 Form 10-Q

Business and period: The company provides regulated water and wastewater utility services, alongside non-regulated water-related businesses. This filing covers the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016; interim results are seasonal and not necessarily indicative of full-year results.

Financial performance

MetricQ3 2016Q3 2015Nine months 2016Nine months 2015
Operating revenue$930 million$896 million$2.500 billion$2.376 billion
Operating income$319 million$361 million$832 million$843 million
Net income attributable to common stockholders$148 million$174 million$367 million$377 million
Diluted EPS$0.83$0.96$2.05$2.09
Operating margin, approximate34.3%40.3%33.3%35.5%
  • Q3 revenue increased 3.8%; nine-month revenue increased 5.2%. Regulated revenue growth reflected rate increases, infrastructure surcharges, acquisitions and organic growth.
  • Operating and maintenance expense rose 18.7% in Q3 and 10.4% year to date. The Q3 increase included a $65 million charge for the Freedom Industries settlement, as well as a $5 million write-off of timekeeping-system costs.
  • The company reported adjusted regulated-business O&M efficiency of 34.9% for the twelve months ended September 30, versus 35.8% a year earlier. This is a non-GAAP measure; management cited revenue growth and expense timing, and expected higher O&M expense in Q4.
  • Regulated net income was $152 million in Q3 and $374 million year to date, versus $174 million and $377 million, respectively, in 2015. Market-Based Businesses earned $7 million in Q3 and $26 million year to date, down from $12 million and $31 million. Q3 military-services revenue fell with completion of projects and lower military-base infrastructure budgets.

Cash flow, balance sheet and liquidity

  • Nine-month operating cash flow was $925 million, up from $856 million. Capital expenditures were $928 million, compared with $791 million; operating cash flow therefore fell $3 million short of capital expenditures before acquisitions and other investing items. Net investing cash outflow was $1.014 billion.
  • Cash and cash equivalents were $46 million at September 30. Short-term debt was $951 million, current long-term debt $53 million, and long-term debt $5.842 billion. Total reported debt across these categories was approximately $6.85 billion.
  • The company reported $5.238 billion of common stockholders’ equity. Its debt-to-capital covenant ratio was 0.57 to 1.00, within the 0.70 maximum. Short-term debt and current long-term debt rose to 8.3% of capital structure from 5.9% at year-end 2015.
  • The revolving credit facility had $1.75 billion of capacity; $89 million was used for letters of credit, and $1.661 billion was reported available for short-term liquidity and letters of credit. The facility supported $951 million of outstanding commercial paper. Management said operating cash flow, capital-market access and the facility should fund near-term needs, while noting access is not assured.
  • Dividends paid were $194 million for the nine months, versus $178 million. The quarterly dividend declared was $0.375 per share. The company repurchased $65 million of shares during the nine months.

Material changes, outlook and key matters

  • Freedom Industries settlement: On October 31, 2016, after quarter-end, the parties reached a binding agreement in principle for a proposed $126 million global settlement. The company recorded a $65 million pretax Q3 charge, net of $61 million in insurance receivables, or $39 million after tax. WVAWC’s proposed contribution is $65 million; final settlement terms and court approval remained pending. Two insurers providing $50 million of coverage had not agreed to participate, and recovery from them is uncertain. WVAWC agreed not to seek West Virginia rate recovery for settlement payments or about $4 million of prior response costs.
  • The company accrued approximately $136 million for probable loss contingencies and estimated up to $48 million of reasonably possible losses for certain matters; it could not estimate losses for some matters. Separately, the Missouri infrastructure-surcharge litigation had a reasonably possible loss range of zero to $26 million.
  • Capital spending and growth: Full-year 2016 capital investment, including acquisitions, was expected to be $1.4–$1.5 billion, primarily for regulated infrastructure. The company closed ten regulated-system acquisitions in the first nine months, adding approximately 7,600 customers. Proposed acquisitions included Scranton wastewater assets for a stated $195 million purchase price, McKeesport wastewater assets for approximately $156 million, and Shorelands Water Company; each remained subject to applicable conditions and approvals.
  • Management cited ongoing growth from regulated investment and rate increases. It also noted that market-based earnings faced pressure from lower military project activity. The filing did not provide a clear full-year earnings or EPS guidance figure.
  • Rate cases and surcharges are subject to regulatory approval. At November 2, the company was awaiting general rate-case orders in five states seeking $97 million of annualized revenue and surcharge approvals in two states seeking $13 million; there is no assurance these requests will be granted. A California rate case sought $51 million over three years.
  • Risks include regulatory decisions and recovery timing, water contamination and related litigation, weather and demand, infrastructure and technology disruptions, operating costs, interest rates, capital-market access, and acquisition execution. A non-cybersecurity firmware failure in April affected an IT storage device; water and wastewater operations were not impacted, and disaster-recovery procedures were used. Management reported disclosure controls were effective at a reasonable level of assurance.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  1. Whether the Freedom Industries settlement received final court approval, the final payment allocation, and whether the two non-participating insurers reimburse WVAWC.
  2. Whether the Q3 profit decline is viewed as primarily settlement-related or reflects continuing cost pressure; compare results excluding the disclosed settlement charge.
  3. Progress on rate-case and surcharge approvals, including the outcome of Missouri litigation and the timing and recoverability of large infrastructure investments.
  4. Funding needs and liquidity as capital spending, commercial paper borrowings and proposed wastewater acquisitions proceed.
  5. Whether military-services revenue weakness persists and whether management’s expected higher Q4 O&M costs materialize.