Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc. annual report, FY2014

SEC Filing Summary

Filing and period: The supplied filing is Ashford Hospitality Prime, Inc.’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, not a filing identified as Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc. The filing is annual; fourth-quarter figures are available in the quarterly-data disclosure.

Business context

Ashford Hospitality Prime was an externally advised hotel REIT focused on luxury, upper-upscale and upscale hotels. At year-end it owned interests in 10 U.S. hotels with 3,707 rooms (3,472 net rooms), including two hotels held through a 75%-owned consolidated joint venture. It acquired the Sofitel Chicago Water Tower and Pier House Resort during 2014. Its operating history as a public company began with the November 2013 spin-off, and prior-period results include carve-out financial information for the initial portfolio.

Financial and operating performance

Metric20142013
Total revenue$307.3 million$233.5 million
Operating income$43.8 million$19.4 million
Net income (loss)$3.5 million($17.9 million)
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company$1.9 million($11.8 million)
Diluted EPS$0.07($0.73)
Cash from operating activities$54.9 million$34.1 million
Hotel EBITDA, including noncontrolling interests$103.3 million$77.9 million
Company-attributable Hotel EBITDA$96.8 million$71.8 million

Revenue rose 31.6%; the comparison reflects both improved hotel performance and the two 2014 acquisitions, so it is not a same-property comparison. Portfolio occupancy increased to 81.62% from 78.40%, ADR to $209.96 from $189.60, and RevPAR to $171.37 from $148.64. Rooms revenue was approximately 74% of 2014 revenue. GAAP operating margin was approximately 14.2% and net margin approximately 1.2% in 2014.

For Q4 2014, revenue was $76.8 million, operating income $9.5 million, net loss $0.9 million, and net loss attributable to the Company $2.1 million; diluted loss per share was $0.08. The prior-year Q4 included a $16.96 million net loss, including substantial spin-off-related costs.

Debt, liquidity and capital allocation

  • At December 31, 2014, debt was $765.2 million, versus $621.9 million a year earlier. Cash and cash equivalents were $171.4 million and restricted cash was $29.6 million. Debt less unrestricted cash was approximately $593.8 million; this is a simple calculation, not the company’s stated net-debt-to-EBITDA measure.
  • Approximately $346.6 million of debt was variable-rate and $418.6 million fixed-rate. A 25-basis-point increase in rates was estimated to add about $867,000 in annual interest expense. Interest-rate caps covered certain variable-rate borrowings.
  • The $150 million secured revolving credit facility was undrawn at year-end. The company reported compliance with its debt covenants and no loan cash-trap provisions were triggered.
  • Operating cash flow was $54.9 million; investing activities used $212.8 million, primarily for acquisitions, hotel improvements and restricted reserves. Financing activities provided $185.6 million, principally from the $143.9 million net proceeds of a common-stock offering and debt borrowings.
  • 2014 dividends declared were $0.20 per share. Management expected a $0.05 quarterly dividend in 2015, subject to board review and available funds. The company repurchased approximately $16.1 million of stock in 2014 under a $100 million authorization.

Changes, outlook, risks and unusual items

  • 2014 results benefited from stronger occupancy and room rates, as well as the Sofitel and Pier House acquisitions. Hotel operating expenses also increased, while interest expense rose 18.2% to $39.0 million with higher debt and acquisition financing.
  • Management said lodging fundamentals had improved and expected continued economic improvement to benefit hotel operations. It estimated approximately $16.7 million of hotel capital expenditures and $48.6 million of debt interest and principal payments through 2015.
  • After year-end, the company refinanced the Pier House’s $69 million mortgage with a $70 million floating-rate, interest-only loan due March 2017, subject to extension options. The new loan carries interest at LIBOR plus 2.25%. A separate $198 million mortgage on two joint-venture hotels had been refinanced in November 2014.
  • Material risks include hotel-cycle and market concentration, variable rates and refinancing needs, required renovations, lender cash-trap and covenant provisions, REIT qualification and distribution requirements, and dependence on external advisor Ashford LLC and third-party hotel managers.
  • The filing highlights conflicts of interest involving Ashford LLC, Ashford Trust and Remington; Remington is owned by the CEO and his father and manages the Pier House. Advisory and management arrangements were not negotiated at arm’s length, and advisory fees include a market-capitalization-based component.
  • Management reported ongoing legal proceedings but did not expect their resolution to materially affect financial position or results, based on current estimates. No hotel impairment charges were recorded in 2012–2014. Management assessed disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting as effective; the auditor did not provide an internal-control attestation.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Confirm the issuer identity: the provided 10-K is for Ashford Hospitality Prime, not Braemar Hotels & Resorts.
  • Separate same-property operating improvement from revenue and EBITDA added by the two acquisitions; check acquisition-period and joint-venture ownership effects.
  • Review debt maturities, extension conditions, variable-rate exposure, interest-rate caps and covenant headroom, including the post-year-end Pier House refinancing.
  • Assess whether operating cash flow can support planned capital spending, debt service, repurchases and the expected dividend, while meeting REIT distribution requirements.
  • Examine related-party advisory and Remington fees, termination provisions, and the practical independence of investment allocation and management decisions.