Clearway Energy, Inc. quarterly report, Q1 FY2016

Business context and reporting period

The filing is NRG Yield, Inc.’s unaudited Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016; the filing identifies the registrant as NRG Yield, Inc., not Clearway Energy, Inc. NRG Yield owned a diversified U.S. portfolio of contracted conventional and renewable generation and thermal infrastructure assets. Management reported approximately 4,435 net MW of contracted generation capacity, with an average remaining offtake-contract duration of about 17 years based on CAFD, plus thermal capacity.

Comparative 2015 results were retrospectively adjusted for common-control asset transfers from NRG. The company cautions that interim results are not necessarily indicative of full-year results.

Financial results and liquidity

MetricQ1 2016Q1 2015
Operating revenue$220 million$200 million
Operating income$68 million$46 million
Net income (loss)$2 million($20 million)
Net income (loss) attributable to NRG Yield, Inc.$5 million($5 million)
Basic and diluted EPS$0.05($0.07)
Net cash from operating activities$102 million$75 million
Capital expenditures$7 million$3 million

Operating margin, calculated as operating income divided by revenue, was approximately 31% versus 23%. Comprehensive loss was $39 million, including a $41 million after-tax unrealized derivative loss; comprehensive loss attributable to the company was $12 million.

At March 31, 2016, total debt was $4.821 billion, including $242 million current, compared with $4.863 billion at year-end 2015. Long-term debt carrying value was $4.521 billion; estimated fair value of total debt was $4.763 billion. Cash and cash equivalents were $76 million, restricted cash $60 million, and total liquidity was approximately $255 million, including $119 million available under the revolving facility. Total assets were $7.659 billion and total liabilities $5.098 billion. The company reported compliance with required debt covenants.

Operating cash flow increased $27 million year over year, while investing cash use was $58 million versus $489 million, primarily because the prior-year period included the January 2015 asset acquisition. Financing used $79 million versus providing $119 million, reflecting lower net borrowings and higher dividends/distributions. Dividends paid were $0.225 per Class A and Class C share; a $0.23 quarterly dividend was declared after quarter-end.

Material changes versus the prior period

  • Revenue rose 10% and operating income increased 48%; company-attributable net income improved from a $5 million loss to $5 million income.
  • Economic gross margin, a non-GAAP operating measure, increased $39 million to $221 million. Drivers included stronger wind generation and Spring Canyon, higher Alta X and XI PPA pricing after contracts began January 1, 2016, El Segundo’s return to service after a prior-year forced outage, and lower thermal gas costs.
  • Renewable MWh sold increased to 1.650 million from 1.174 million. Thermal MWt and MWh sold declined to 553,000 from 617,000 and 40,000 from 44,000, respectively.
  • Interest expense declined $5 million, chiefly following redemption of Alta X and XI project debt, partly offset by convertible-note issuance, revolver borrowings, and swap fair-value changes.
  • Derivative liabilities rose to $148 million from $100 million, largely due to interest-rate contracts; the company recorded a $41 million other comprehensive loss on derivatives.

Outlook, risks and contingencies

Management said liquidity, operating cash flow, and revolver availability were expected to be adequate for financial commitments, debt service, capital needs, and dividends. The company stated it expected comparable dividends to continue in the foreseeable future, subject to available capital, market conditions, legal requirements, and contractual restrictions. No quantified earnings or CAFD guidance was provided.

Wind performance in Q1 was above the prior year and company expectations, but April wind resources were below expectations; a prolonged shortfall could adversely affect results. Management also cited difficult capital-market conditions that could constrain acquisitions and financing. Other disclosed risks include weather and resource variability, outages, fuel and power prices, counterparty performance, regulation and environmental compliance, substantial indebtedness, and access to capital.

On April 19, 2016, a purported class action was filed alleging securities-law disclosure violations concerning low wind production before the June 2015 Class C offering. The company said it believes it has a valid defense, intends to defend vigorously, and could not estimate the outcome or potential costs. It reported no material changes to the risk factors in its 2015 Form 10-K. Management concluded disclosure controls were effective.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Confirm the issuer and security being analyzed: this supplied filing is for NRG Yield, Inc.; the requested company metadata names Clearway Energy, Inc.
  • Assess whether the Q1 improvement in operating income and renewable output is sustainable, particularly in light of below-expectation April wind resources.
  • Review debt maturities, project-level restrictions, floating-rate exposure, and the availability of the $119 million revolver capacity; reported liquidity includes restricted cash.
  • Evaluate dividend coverage and the effect of NRG’s and tax-equity investors’ noncontrolling interests on cash available to public shareholders.
  • Track the securities class action, derivative valuation changes, and the company’s ability to fund planned acquisitions amid challenging capital markets.