Designer Brands Inc. quarterly report, Q2 FY2012

Business context and reporting period

The supplied filing is DSW Inc.’s unaudited Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 28, 2012—not a 2011 Q2 filing. The filing identifies the registrant as DSW Inc., rather than Designer Brands Inc.; verify the company and period requested against the source record. DSW operated 337 stores in 41 states, dsw.com, and 343 leased departments.

Financial performance and liquidity

MetricThree months ended July 28, 2012Six months ended July 28, 2012
Net sales$512.2 million, up 7.5%$1,070.8 million, up 9.3%
Comparable sales growth4.2%6.0%
Gross margin31.3%, versus 32.7%33.0%, versus 33.4%
Operating profit$47.3 million, versus $26.0 million$112.7 million, versus $30.6 million
Net income$29.3 million, versus $145.9 million$69.2 million, versus $122.4 million
Diluted EPS, net of noncontrolling interests$0.65, versus $3.96$1.54, versus $3.54

Prior-year net income and EPS benefited substantially from merger-related tax items and valuation-allowance release; prior-year results also included significant noncash derivative charges. These items make reported year-over-year earnings comparisons less representative of underlying operations. Current-period gross margin was pressured by markdowns; management said clearance activity normalized markdowns toward historical levels.

For the six months, operating cash flow was $101.5 million, compared with $65.5 million; investing cash flow was negative $123.4 million, including $45.7 million of capital expenditures. Cash and equivalents were $61.1 million, short-term investments $319.9 million, and long-term investments $103.8 million at quarter-end. Net working capital was $653.1 million and the current ratio was 3.5. DSW had no outstanding debt; its $100 million revolving facility had $69.9 million available and $30.1 million of letters of credit outstanding.

Material changes versus the prior comparable period

  • Six-month sales increased 9.3%, with comparable sales up 6.0%; the prior-year comparable-sales increase was 11.5%.
  • Six-month gross margin declined 0.4 percentage points, while DSW segment merchandise margin declined 0.7 points, primarily from increased markdowns.
  • Operating profit rose, but reported net income fell because the prior-year comparison included a large tax benefit and merger-period items. The prior-year period also included PIES and warrant fair-value charges and PIES interest expense; the PIES had been settled in 2011.
  • Operating cash flow increased, partly because RVI tax attributes reduced cash taxes. DSW invested more in capital expenditures than in the prior-year half.
  • Warrants were fully exercised by July 28, 2012; the $29.3 million warrant liability reported at January 28 was eliminated.

Outlook, risks, contingencies and unusual items

  • Management expected fiscal 2012 capital expenditures of approximately $115 million and planned to open approximately 35–40 stores. It stated that cash, investments, operating cash flow and facility availability should support operations, seasonal working capital, growth investments and dividends.
  • The company authorized up to $100 million of share repurchases over 12 months; no program repurchases had occurred by July 28. The board subsequently declared a $0.18-per-share quarterly dividend, payable September 28, 2012.
  • Risks cited include economic weakness affecting traffic, sales and markdowns; fashion and competition; inventory management; new-store execution; distribution and fulfillment operations; vendor and leased-partner relationships; and risks associated with cash and investments.
  • Legacy Filene’s Basement lease guarantees remain contingent. DSW recorded a $6.9 million liability; estimated loss ranges were zero to $8 million for Union Square and zero to $3 million for Bergen, New Jersey. Landlords had filed lawsuits, and the company disputed or questioned enforceability and exposure.
  • After quarter-end, an appeals court affirmed a $6.8 million award in DSW’s insurance dispute relating to a 2005 customer-data theft. DSW had not recorded the recovery and said it would recognize it upon receipt of cash; further appeal remained possible.
  • DSW reported effective disclosure controls and no material change in internal control over financial reporting during the quarter.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Confirm the requested issuer and reporting period: the provided filing is DSW Inc., quarter ended July 28, 2012, despite the metadata naming Designer Brands Inc. and 2011 Q2.
  • Assess earnings excluding prior-year tax benefits and merger/derivative effects, and monitor ongoing markdowns and gross-margin trends.
  • Track cash generation against store expansion, distribution and fulfillment investments, dividends, and the authorized repurchase program.
  • Review the ultimate outcome and possible exposure from the Filene’s Basement lease-guarantee litigation and the timing/collectability of the $6.8 million insurance award.