ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC. quarterly report, Q2 FY2010

Essex Property Trust, Inc. — Q2 2010 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Three and six months ended June 30, 2010; unaudited. Essex is a residential REIT operating primarily in Southern and Northern California and Seattle. At quarter-end, it had interests in 134 apartment communities with 27,405 units, five office and commercial buildings, and development activity across its portfolio.

Financial and operating performance

MetricQ2 2010Q2 2009Six months 2010Six months 2009
Property revenue$99.6 million$102.5 million$199.3 million$206.4 million
Net income$13.9 million$17.5 million$31.7 million$40.8 million
Net income available to common stockholders$9.5 million$11.4 million$22.6 million$53.7 million
Diluted EPS$0.32$0.43$0.77$1.96
Operating cash flow—$89.4 million$89.2 million
FFO per diluted share$1.34$1.43$2.80$3.92
  • Quarterly net operating income was $64.6 million, versus $68.6 million a year earlier; NOI margin on property revenue was approximately 64.9%, down from 67.0%.
  • Same-property revenue fell 4.4% in Q2 and 5.5% for the six-month period. Lower scheduled rents were the primary driver; same-property financial occupancy improved 40 basis points to 97.2% in Q2 and 97.4% for the six months.
  • At June 30, total assets were $3.32 billion and total liabilities were $2.09 billion. Mortgage notes payable were $1.64 billion; lines of credit were $264 million; exchangeable bonds were $3.2 million.
  • Unrestricted cash was $8.4 million, restricted cash $19.4 million, and marketable securities $92.5 million. The company reported $450 million of committed credit facilities, with $14 million drawn on its $200 million unsecured facility and the $250 million Freddie Mac facility fully drawn.
  • Investing activities used $123.2 million in the first half, including $53.4 million of development spending and $66.5 million of contributions to co-investments. Financing activities provided $21.4 million. The quarterly common dividend was $1.033 per share.

Material changes and notable items

  • Q2 property revenue decreased 2.8% year over year, while same-property average rental rates fell 5.8%; higher occupancy and lower bad debt partly offset the rent decline. Seattle had the largest regional same-property revenue decline.
  • Q2 interest and other income included a $4.0 million gain on marketable-security sales. First-half gains on such sales totaled $9.0 million. Depreciation and amortization increased, while impairment charges were nil versus $5.8 million in the prior-year first half.
  • First-half 2010 common earnings and FFO comparisons are affected by prior-year items, including a $25.7 million accounting benefit from redeeming preferred stock below its carrying value, a $6.1 million debt-retirement gain, and discontinued-operation gains. First-half 2010 had none of these reported benefits.
  • During Q2, Essex issued 437,200 common shares for net proceeds of $45.7 million. It also purchased the Santee Court secured note for $21.0 million, at a discount to principal, with an October 2010 maturity.
  • After quarter-end, the company acquired two communities for a combined $106.6 million. It refinanced $129.5 million of loans at 7.7%–8.2% with $130.1 million of fixed-rate loans at 4.6%; settlement of $100 million of forward-starting swaps increased the effective rate on those new loans to 6.0% and required $16.7 million in payments.

Outlook, risks, and contingencies

  • Management expected same-property revenue in Q3 2010 to be slightly lower than Q3 2009, due to expected rent and/or occupancy declines, but slightly higher than Q2 2010 as scheduled rents improved. The filing does not provide a full-year earnings or FFO forecast.
  • Management believed operating cash flow, cash and securities, credit availability, capital-market access, and potential property dispositions would meet reasonably anticipated 2010 cash needs. It cautioned that capital-market disruption could constrain acquisitions, development, and refinancing or raise financing costs.
  • Development and predevelopment plans require additional capital; the company cited remaining project costs and potential funding from working capital, credit facilities, securities issuance, and dispositions. Future costs, completion, lease-up, and returns remain uncertain.
  • At quarter-end, seven forward-starting swaps had a $375 million notional amount and a net liability of approximately $72.5 million; rate caps covered $191.9 million of notional. The filing identifies interest-rate and refinancing exposure.
  • The company faced mold-related and other ordinary-course litigation. Potential mold and environmental liabilities were not quantifiable; management did not expect lawsuits to materially affect results. The filing also notes that certain extraordinary risks, including earthquake, are uninsured.

Investor verification priorities

  • Track same-property rents and revenue, particularly the expected Q3 trend and regional weakness.
  • Review debt maturities, credit-facility extensions and covenants, and the cost and terms of future refinancing.
  • Confirm the cash and earnings effects of swap settlements and the related effective borrowing rates.
  • Assess development funding needs, remaining project costs, lease-up progress, and co-investment performance.
  • Reconcile year-over-year GAAP earnings and FFO changes for prior-year preferred-stock, debt-retirement, and property-sale items.