ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. quarterly report, Q2 FY2011

Entergy Texas, Inc. — Q2 2011 Form 10-Q

Business context and period. Entergy Texas is a regulated electric utility serving customers in Texas. This summary focuses on Entergy Texas, Inc. and its subsidiaries within a combined Entergy filing. The unaudited quarter and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011; comparisons are with the same 2010 periods.

Financial performance and liquidity

Amounts below are in millions of dollars unless stated otherwise.

MetricQ2 2011Q2 2010Six months 2011Six months 2010
Operating revenue444.4471.2793.3807.4
Operating income57.753.6103.395.7
Net income23.122.338.834.8
Operating margin13.0%11.4%13.0%11.9%
Net margin5.2%4.7%4.9%4.3%
  • Cash flow, six months: operating cash flow was $25.9 million versus $4.7 million; investing cash use was $50.8 million versus $61.0 million; financing cash use was $10.1 million versus $42.7 million. Cash fell to $0.3 million from $35.3 million at year-end 2010.
  • Debt and capital: long-term debt was $1.628 billion, including $776 million of securitization bonds. Debt-to-capital was 65.4%, or 49.7% excluding non-recourse securitization bonds; net debt-to-net capital excluding those bonds was 49.7%, compared with 49.8% at year-end.
  • Liquidity: a $100 million credit facility was undrawn at June 30 and expires in August 2012. The filing reports $21 million of short-term borrowings against a $200 million FERC-authorized limit. Total assets were $3.761 billion and common equity was $863.1 million.

Material changes versus prior periods

  • Q2 net income rose $0.8 million; first-half net income increased $4.1 million. Higher net revenue and, for the first half, lower interest expense supported results.
  • Net revenue rose to $142.1 million in Q2 from $139.7 million and to $269.3 million for the first half from $260.8 million. Base-rate increases contributed: a $59 million annual increase effective August 2010 and an additional $9 million increase effective May 2011.
  • First-half billed retail electricity usage rose 5% (377 GWh), with industrial usage up 13%, principally in chemicals and refining. Q2 retail usage rose 9% (339 GWh), reflecting higher residential, commercial, and industrial sales.
  • Lower wholesale sales to affiliated customers, lower fuel-recovery revenue and higher purchased-power capacity costs partly offset the net-revenue gains. The company also refunded approximately $73 million of fuel-cost overcollections through November 2010, with most customer refunds made over three billing cycles beginning February 2011.

Outlook, risks, contingencies, and unusual items

  • The filing provides no specific Entergy Texas earnings or revenue guidance. Management cautions that utility results are seasonal and interim results should not be treated as a full-year estimate.
  • Rate recovery and regulatory outcomes remain important, including fuel-cost recovery, System Agreement matters, and the proposed transition of the utility companies to MISO. The combined filing estimates transition and implementation costs of approximately $105 million if all utility companies join, with additional costs possible; these are system-wide estimates, not Entergy Texas-only costs.
  • Key operating and financial risks include weather, fuel and purchased-power prices, generation and transmission performance, regulatory decisions, environmental requirements, and access to capital. The filing reported no material change to the risk factors in the 2010 Form 10-K.
  • A Texas power-price lawsuit involving a purported class of Texas retail customers was pending, with a class-certification hearing scheduled for August 2011. Entergy entities also identified potential responsible-party status at the SESCO contaminated site; Entergy’s total estimated share of remediation costs was preliminarily expected to be below $1 million.
  • Entergy Texas reported effective income-tax rates of 38.1% for Q2 and 38.0% for the first half, compared with 38.2% and 40.0% in 2010. The filing attributes the rates primarily to state taxes and utility-plant book-tax differences.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether rate increases and fuel-cost recovery continue to support utility net revenue after the customer refunds.
  • Cash generation and available liquidity, given cash of only $0.3 million at quarter-end, and the availability and terms of the credit facility and money-pool funding.
  • Debt metrics both including and excluding securitization bonds, which are non-recourse to Entergy Texas.
  • Developments in the Texas power-price class action, fuel-cost recovery proceedings, and MISO transition decisions and costs.
  • Whether higher electricity usage, especially industrial demand, is sustained and whether purchased-power capacity costs or lower affiliated wholesale sales offset the benefit.