Hometrust Bancshares, Inc. quarterly report, Q3 FY2016

Hometrust Bancshares, Inc. — Form 10-Q Summary

Period clarification: The supplied filing is for the quarter ended March 31, 2016, not 2015 Q3 as stated in the request metadata. It reports the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2016, compared with the corresponding 2015 periods. Amounts below are in U.S. dollars; financial statement amounts are generally in millions unless otherwise stated.

Business context and reporting period

HomeTrust is a bank holding company whose principal business is gathering deposits and making consumer and commercial loans across North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia. It reported 39 locations. The Bank converted from a national to a North Carolina state bank on December 31, 2015; its primary regulators are now the North Carolina Commissioner of Banks and the Federal Reserve.

Financial performance and condition

MetricThree months ended March 31, 2016Nine months ended March 31, 2016
Net interest income$20.2 million, versus $20.2 million$60.9 million, up 3.3%
Net income$3.1 million, versus $1.2 million$8.2 million, up 49.1%
Diluted earnings per share$0.18, versus $0.06$0.46, versus $0.28
Tax-equivalent net interest margin3.36%, versus 3.52%3.36%, versus 3.73%
Noninterest income / expense$3.4 million / $19.4 million$9.8 million / $59.1 million
  • Balance sheet at March 31, 2016: Total assets were $2.760 billion; net loans were $1.793 billion; deposits were $1.832 billion; other borrowings were $507.0 million; and stockholders’ equity was $358.8 million.
  • Loan growth and funding: Total loans increased $129.0 million, or 7.7%, from June 30, 2015. Growth included purchased HELOCs and indirect auto loans. Deposits declined $40.1 million, primarily from managed runoff of higher-cost certificates of deposit; borrowings rose $32.0 million.
  • Cash flow: For the nine months, operating activities provided $22.9 million, investing activities used $57.3 million, and financing activities used $32.5 million. Cash and cash equivalents fell $67.0 million to $49.2 million. Commercial paper was $275.9 million and certificates of deposit in other banks were $158.8 million.
  • Credit quality: Nonperforming assets were $27.7 million, or 1.01% of assets, down from $31.9 million, or 1.15%, at June 30, 2015. Nonaccruing loans were $21.0 million. The allowance for loan losses was $21.8 million, 1.20% of total loans; there was no loan-loss provision in the nine-month period.
  • Capital and liquidity: The Bank was categorized as well capitalized. Its common equity Tier 1 ratio was 12.40% and total risk-based capital ratio was 13.39%. Management reported $13.6 million of additional FHLB borrowing capacity, a $169.2 million Federal Reserve line, and $35.0 million in lines with other banks; none of the latter lines was drawn.
  • Shareholder actions: The Company repurchased 1.316 million shares for $24.2 million during the nine months, at an average price of $18.38 per share. Tangible book value per share increased to $18.76 from $18.06 at June 30, 2015.

Material changes versus prior comparable periods

  • Quarterly net income increased substantially year over year, while quarterly net interest income was essentially unchanged. Lower noninterest expense, including no merger-related expense versus $1.7 million in the prior-year quarter, was a key contributor.
  • Nine-month net income rose 49.1%; noninterest expense declined 2.6%, mainly because merger-related expenses fell by $5.4 million. Net interest margin compressed, reflecting lower loan yields and the increased use of short-term FHLB borrowings.
  • Asset quality improved: nonperforming assets, classified assets, delinquent loans, and impaired loans were lower than at June 30, 2015. The allowance-to-loans ratio also declined from 1.33% to 1.20%.
  • Cash and cash equivalents decreased as liquidity was deployed into loan growth, stock repurchases, and other investments. The Company also reduced higher-cost time deposits and increased borrowings.

Outlook, commentary, risks, and unusual items

  • Management cited opportunities for organic growth as local economies and loan demand strengthen, while stating that future expansion would focus primarily on existing markets and selective acquisitions. The filing provides no quantified earnings or revenue guidance.
  • Management expected annual savings of approximately $350,000 from the charter conversion and $1.2 million from branch consolidations; it also cited a branch optimization study intended to improve efficiency going into fiscal 2017. These are expectations, not guaranteed outcomes.
  • The quarter included a one-time $150,000 payment related to a merchant credit-card vendor change. Nine-month income tax expense included a $526,000 nonrecurring charge from the reduction in the value of deferred tax assets following North Carolina corporate tax-rate changes.
  • Interest-rate sensitivity is a stated risk: about $592 million of loans had rate floors, and management warned that rising rates could pressure interest income until rates exceed those floors. The company also relies on short-term FHLB funding as part of its leveraging strategy.
  • Other disclosed risks include borrower credit deterioration, changes in real estate values and regional economic conditions, deposit competition and runoff, regulatory actions, acquisition integration, cybersecurity and third-party service-provider risks, and estimation uncertainty in loan-loss reserves and asset valuations.
  • The Company reported ordinary-course litigation, but management did not believe any pending matter would materially adversely affect financial condition or results. Management said disclosure controls were effective and reported no material change in internal control over financial reporting.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Confirm the intended reporting period: this filing covers the quarter ended March 31, 2016, despite the request’s “2015 Q3” label.
  • Assess whether loan growth, especially purchased HELOCs and indirect auto lending, is sustainable and adequately compensated for credit risk.
  • Review the effect of short-term FHLB borrowing on margins, funding costs, liquidity, and sensitivity to interest-rate changes.
  • Track deposit retention and the capacity to meet maturing certificates of deposit and $511.7 million of loan commitments and unused credit lines.
  • Evaluate credit trends, including nonaccruals, troubled debt restructurings, collateral values, and the adequacy of reserves; acquired loans are treated differently for allowance purposes.
  • Compare reported results with management’s expected cost savings and distinguish recurring earnings from the vendor payment, state tax charge, and prior-year merger costs.