NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORP annual report, FY2013

Business context and reporting period

National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation (CFC) filed this Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2013; it is an annual report, not a standalone Q4 filing. The consolidated results include CFC, Rural Telephone Finance Cooperative (RTFC), National Cooperative Services Corporation (NCSC), and certain controlled entities. CFC is a member-owned, tax-exempt cooperative lender that primarily finances rural electric utilities; about 98% of the outstanding loan portfolio was attributable to electric utility organizations.

Financial performance and condition

MetricFY2013 / May 31, 2013Prior comparable period
Interest income$955.8 million$961.0 million in FY2012
Interest expense$692.0 million$761.8 million in FY2012
Net interest income$263.7 million$199.2 million in FY2012
Net income (loss)$358.1 million$(148.8) million in FY2012
Adjusted net income (non-GAAP)$216.8 million$75.0 million in FY2012
TIER / adjusted TIER1.52 / 1.29Below 1.00 / 1.10 in FY2012
Operating cash flow$163.5 million$144.1 million in FY2012, as corrected in this filing
Total loans outstanding$20.30 billion$18.91 billion at May 31, 2012
Allowance for loan losses$54.3 million$143.3 million at May 31, 2012
Total assets / total equity$22.07 billion / $811.3 million$19.95 billion / $490.8 million
Total debt outstanding$20.55 billion; short-term debt was $7.72 billion$18.55 billion total; short-term debt was $4.49 billion
Adjusted debt-to-equity ratio (non-GAAP)5.76-to-16.01-to-1 at May 31, 2012
Cash and investments$908.7 million, including $700 million in interest-bearing deposits$250.2 million

Net interest yield was 1.24%; adjusted net yield, which includes derivative cash settlements in funding costs, was 0.95%. The average loan yield declined to 4.86% from 5.09%. Figures are consolidated unless stated otherwise; adjusted measures are non-GAAP.

Material changes versus the prior comparable period

  • Loans grew $1.38 billion, or 7%, with growth concentrated in CFC distribution and power supply lending and NCSC. Advances under two member financing programs totaled $885 million. RTFC loans declined.
  • Net income swung from a loss to a profit, while adjusted net income increased to $216.8 million. Lower funding costs lifted net interest income; the adjusted cost of debt fell to 3.86% from 4.23%.
  • Reported derivative results shifted to an $84.8 million gain from a $236.6 million loss, largely because of non-cash fair-value movements. Foreclosed-asset losses narrowed to $0.9 million from $67.5 million.
  • The allowance for loan losses fell by $89.0 million. A $74 million reduction from revised estimation assumptions was recorded as a recovery in the fourth quarter; the company also wrote off $19 million on a borrower whose loan was restructured.
  • Debt increased by $1.99 billion, while the share of short-term funding rose to 20% from 17% of total debt. Guarantees outstanding fell to $1.11 billion from $1.25 billion.

Outlook, risks, contingencies and unusual items

  • Management expected new long-term advances to slightly exceed scheduled long-term repayments over the next 12 months, with core lending earnings “fairly stable” and adjusted debt-to-equity maintained within a 6.00-to-1 range. These are forward-looking statements, not assurances.
  • Long-term debt of $3.67 billion was scheduled to mature within 12 months, alongside $4.05 billion of commercial paper and other short-term funding due to mature. Management cited cash and investments, bank revolvers, Federal Financing Bank capacity, a Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation facility, and capital-market access as liquidity sources. At May 31, $3.10 billion was available under revolving credit agreements; the company reported compliance with debt covenants.
  • Unadvanced loan commitments totaled $13.42 billion, including $1.70 billion of committed lines not subject to a material-adverse-change clause at each draw. Management expected most commitments to expire unused, but draws could increase funding needs.
  • Key risks include capital-market access and refinancing, rising funding costs or rating downgrades, interest-rate and derivative exposure, borrower defaults and concentration in rural electric cooperatives, and changes in tax or regulatory rules. A rating-trigger termination of affected swaps could require payments of up to $209 million under the stated scenario; the company also reported that a counterparty downgrade gave it an option to terminate swaps with an estimated $18 million settlement cost.
  • Guarantees totaled $1.11 billion; CFC was also liquidity provider for $598 million of variable-rate tax-exempt bonds. No bond purchases were required under this liquidity-provider role during FY2013. Unsecured loans were 11% of loans outstanding.
  • Legal matters included continuing claims related to the Innovative Communication Corporation bankruptcy; management said it had recorded no legal reserve and did not expect proceedings, individually or in aggregate, to materially harm the company. The filing also reports a $4 million payment related to the ICC bankruptcy plan.
  • Other unusual items included a $13 million voluntary pension-plan contribution, a $13 million loan prepayment fee, early debt redemptions and an exchange of $340 million of 8% notes for lower-coupon bonds plus cash. CFC’s exemption from federal income tax could be affected by legislative, administrative or operational changes.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  1. Whether the $74 million allowance-estimate benefit is supportable under the revised default data, risk-rating mapping and loss-emergence period, and how allowance adequacy changes as the portfolio grows.
  2. How much of the FY2013 reported profit reflects recurring lending performance versus derivative fair-value gains, allowance changes, foreclosed-asset results and fees; reconcile GAAP income with adjusted income.
  3. Whether short-term funding can be rolled over and scheduled maturities refinanced, including the availability and terms of committed facilities and capital-market funding.
  4. Borrower credit quality and the status, collateral recovery and potential losses associated with non-performing, restructured and foreclosed exposures.
  5. Potential cash needs from guarantees, unadvanced commitments, derivative rating triggers and other contingent obligations, as well as continued compliance with covenants and maintenance of CFC’s tax-exempt status.