SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Co annual report, FY2011

Southern California Edison Company: 2011 Form 10-K

Reporting period: Fiscal year ended December 31, 2011. SCE is a regulated electric utility serving nearly 14 million people across approximately 50,000 square miles of Southern California. Its common stock is wholly owned by Edison International.

Financial performance and position

Metric20112010
Operating revenue$10.577 billion$9.983 billion
Operating income$2.123 billion$1.864 billion
Net income$1.144 billion$1.092 billion
Net income available for common stock$1.085 billion$1.040 billion
Net cash from operating activities$3.261 billion$3.386 billion
Capital expenditures$4.122 billion$3.780 billion
Total assets$40.315 billion$35.906 billion
Long-term debt, including current portion$8.431 billion$7.627 billion

Operating margin was approximately 20.1%, compared with 18.7% in 2010. Revenue increased 6.0% and operating income increased 13.9%; common earnings rose 4.3%. Management attributed higher core earnings primarily to rate-base growth. The 2010 comparison included a $95 million after-tax Global Settlement benefit and a $39 million after-tax health-care legislation charge; SCE reported 2011 core earnings of $1.085 billion versus $984 million in 2010.

Fourth-quarter 2011 revenue was $2.514 billion, operating income $474 million, net income $262 million, and common earnings $247 million. Fourth-quarter 2010 figures were $2.479 billion, $383 million, $194 million, and $181 million, respectively. SCE notes that results are seasonal, with the third quarter generally strongest.

Cash and cash equivalents were $57 million at year-end, versus $257 million a year earlier. Credit facilities totaled $2.894 billion, with $2.394 billion available after borrowings and letters of credit. SCE reported a debt-to-total-capitalization ratio of 0.48, within its 0.65 covenant limit. Net cash decreased by $200 million during 2011. Net regulatory balancing-account overcollections were $1.2 billion. The balance sheet included $30.357 billion of total liabilities and $9.958 billion of total equity.

Material changes and developments

  • Revenue growth reflected authorized rate increases, transmission investment entering rate base, and SCE replacing power previously supplied under CDWR contracts that expired by year-end. Retail billed and unbilled revenue, excluding wholesale sales and balancing-account differences, was approximately $10.0 billion in both 2011 and 2010.
  • Operating expenses increased to $8.454 billion from $8.119 billion. Higher depreciation and maintenance costs were partly offset by lower maintenance costs associated with the prior-year San Onofre Unit 3 outage.
  • Operating cash flow declined $125 million, while capital spending increased. Investing cash outflow was $4.260 billion; financing provided $799 million, including debt and preference-stock issuance. SCE paid $461 million in common dividends to its parent.
  • SCE’s net fair-value liability for commodity derivatives rose to $936 million from $207 million, largely reflecting lower power and natural gas prices. Regulatory mechanisms are expected to pass these fair-value changes through to customers rather than earnings, though cash flows may be affected.

Outlook, management commentary, and risks

  • Rates and regulation: SCE requested a 2012 base-rate revenue requirement of $6.3 billion. Regulators and intervenors proposed substantial reductions to the request; a final CPUC decision was expected in the first half of 2012. SCE’s requested incremental base-rate increases were $809 million in 2012, $117 million in 2013, and $513 million in 2014. These were requests, not approved outcomes.
  • Capital plan: Forecast capital expenditures for 2012-2014 were $11.8 billion to $13.2 billion. SCE identified reliability, grid expansion, renewable-energy transmission, generation, and smart-meter completion as priorities. Environmental capital expenditures were forecast at $499 million, $534 million, and $576 million for 2012, 2013, and 2014, respectively.
  • Project execution: Direct cost estimates increased to $2.5 billion for the Tehachapi transmission project from $2.1 billion, and to $860 million for Devers-Colorado River from $649 million. Permitting, schedule delays, environmental mitigation, aviation marking requirements, and community opposition could add costs or delay completion.
  • San Onofre: After year-end, Unit 3 was taken offline on January 31, 2012 following a leak in a newly installed steam-generator tube. Inspections also found isolated wear in Unit 2 tubes, with some removed from service preventively. NRC review and testing were ongoing; restart timing and replacement-power costs were uncertain. SCE expected to submit final steam-generator project costs to the CPUC in late 2012.
  • Other material exposures: Risks include timely recovery of costs through regulated rates, extensive capital requirements and access to financing, nuclear safety and spent-fuel storage, wildfire liability and insurance availability, environmental compliance costs, and counterparty, commodity-price, and collateral requirements. Environmental remediation liabilities were $52 million; SCE said reasonably possible additional costs could reach $203 million across identified material and immaterial sites, with regulatory recovery expected for recorded costs.
  • Contingencies: A CPUC preliminary report concerning the November 2011 San Gabriel Valley windstorm alleged safety-rule and evidence-preservation issues; SCE could not estimate potential penalties. In the Malibu wildfire proceeding, staff proposed approximately $50 million of penalties for SCE, which disputed the allegations. SCE also faced Four Corners Clean Air Act litigation and greenhouse-gas-related litigation; losses were not estimable for certain matters.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  • Final CPUC outcomes for the 2012 General Rate Case and FERC transmission formula rates, including allowed returns, recovery timing, and any disallowances.
  • San Onofre inspection findings, NRC actions, repair and restart schedules, replacement-power costs, and the CPUC’s review of steam-generator project costs.
  • Updated cost, schedule, and regulatory approvals for Tehachapi and Devers-Colorado River, plus the expected 2012 sale of SCE’s Four Corners interest.
  • Whether operating cash flow and available financing will support the capital program, debt maturities, benefit-plan funding, and dividends while maintaining covenant and regulatory capital requirements.
  • Potential financial effects of wildfire claims, environmental rules and remediation, renewable procurement obligations, and other contingencies whose outcomes or costs remain uncertain.