SRX Global Inc. quarterly report, Q3 FY2013

Business context and reporting period

The supplied filing is Sport Endurance, Inc.’s unaudited Form 10-Q for the quarter and nine months ended May 31, 2013; this differs from the requested company name, SRX Global Inc., and should be verified. Sport Endurance describes itself as a development-stage company planning to manufacture and distribute sports energy drinks, but production and distribution had not begun. Its fiscal year ends August 31.

Key financial metrics

MetricThree months ended May 31, 2013Nine months ended May 31, 2013Comparison / balance date
Revenue$0$0$0 in comparable 2012 periods
Operating expenses$5,970$16,1102012: $4,878 and $12,238
Interest expense$983$2,8522012: $458 and $1,955
Net loss$6,953 per financial statements$18,9622012: $5,336 and $14,193
Operating cash flowNot separately reported$(11,716)2012 nine months: $(13,507)
Cash and cash equivalentsNot applicable$0 at period end$38 at August 31, 2012; $21 bank overdraft at May 31, 2013
Current liabilities / working capital deficitNot applicable$84,439 / $(84,439)At August 31, 2012: $68,659 / $(68,621)
Total assetsNot applicable$9,620$12,802 at August 31, 2012, principally equipment

Net loss per share was $(0.12) for the quarter and $(0.31) for the nine-month period, versus $(0.09) and $(0.24) in 2012. No meaningful revenue or profit margins are available because the company reported no revenue.

Related-party amounts due were $55,194, consisting of unsecured demand loans bearing 8% interest; accrued related-party interest was $7,403. Accounts payable were $21,821. Financing activities provided $11,678 during the nine months, principally from $11,657 in related-party loans; cash decreased by $38 to zero.

Material changes versus prior comparable periods

  • Nine-month net loss increased $4,769, or approximately 34%, while revenue remained zero.
  • Operating expenses increased by $3,872 for the nine-month period, including higher general and administrative and professional fees. Interest expense rose $897, which management attributed to related-party loans.
  • Current liabilities increased by $15,780 from August 31, 2012, and the working capital deficit widened by $15,818.
  • The company effected a 1,000-for-1 reverse stock split in November 2012 and issued 203 post-split common shares for fractional-share adjustments. Shares outstanding were 60,403 as of May 31, 2013.

Outlook, risks, contingencies, and unusual items

  • Management said it was pursuing new ventures and additional capital, and anticipated operating losses over the next 12 months. It did not expect sales-generated income to be sufficient to meet working-capital needs. Financing plans include equity, debt, third-party or bank financing, with no assurance funds will be available.
  • The filing states that recurring losses, a $255,339 accumulated deficit, a $84,439 working capital deficit, and lack of cash raise substantial doubt about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements contain no adjustments for a possible failure to continue.
  • A major shareholder provided an additional $1,100 unsecured demand loan at 8% on June 7, 2013, after the reporting date.
  • The company reported no employees other than its unpaid CEO, no material off-balance-sheet arrangements, and no known material legal proceedings. It reported no change in risk factors from its 2012 Form 10-K.
  • Management concluded disclosure controls were not effective, citing no independent board or audit committee, inadequate segregation of duties, and reliance on a financial consultant for financial reporting. It said remediation depended on obtaining resources.
  • The MD&A gives quarterly net loss as $6,593 in one passage, while the financial statements report $6,953; the filing text does not reconcile this discrepancy. The MD&A also describes the quarterly increase as $1,617, which does not match the difference between the stated comparative losses.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  • Confirm the issuer identity: the filing names Sport Endurance, Inc., not SRX Global Inc.
  • Reconcile the quarterly net-loss and year-over-year change discrepancies between the MD&A and financial statements.
  • Assess the going-concern warning, immediate liquidity shortfall, and the availability and terms of further financing, particularly related-party demand loans.
  • Verify whether the planned energy-drink business has commenced and whether any revenues or operating funding have been secured since the filing.
  • Evaluate the disclosed ineffective controls and whether promised governance and accounting improvements were implemented.