Tronox Holdings Plc quarterly report, Q2 FY2017

Business context and reporting period

Tronox Limited’s unaudited Form 10-Q covers the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2017; amounts are U.S. dollars in millions unless stated otherwise. The company operated TiO₂ and mineral-sands businesses and a natural soda ash business (“Alkali”).

Financial performance

MetricQ2 2017Q2 2016Six months 2017Six months 2016
Net sales$622$538$1,191$1,014
Gross profit$124$59$214$80
Gross margin20%11%18%8%
Operating income (loss)$55$9$71$(22)
Net income (loss)$5$(50)$(33)$(144)
Net income (loss) attributable to Tronox$3$(52)$(38)$(145)
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share$0.02$(0.44)$(0.32)$(1.24)
Adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP)$140$71$241$111

Q2 sales rose 16% year over year, primarily from higher prices and, to a lesser extent, higher volumes and product mix. TiO₂ sales increased 26% to $421 million; Alkali sales declined 2% to $201 million. Q2 operating income included $29 million of corporate costs, up from $10 million, including transaction-related professional fees and higher compensation expense.

For the first half, sales increased 17%. TiO₂ sales rose 29% to $799 million, while Alkali sales decreased 1% to $392 million. Operating improvement was led by higher TiO₂ prices and lower production costs. Interest and debt expense was $46 million in Q2 and $92 million for the half, unchanged year over year.

Cash, debt and liquidity

  • Six-month operating cash flow was $137 million, versus $69 million in 2016; capital expenditures were $56 million. Cash increased $55 million to $303 million. Financing cash outflow was $31 million, including $12 million of dividends and $8 million of debt repayments.
  • At June 30, cash was $303 million, short-term debt $150 million, and long-term debt, net, $2.886 billion. Net debt was approximately $2.7 billion, compared with $2.8 billion at year-end 2016.
  • Working capital was $772 million. The company reported $181 million available under its UBS revolver, for total stated liquidity of $484 million. The approximately $100 million ABSA facility expired June 14, 2017; renewal discussions were ongoing.
  • Management said existing cash, operations and revolver availability were expected to fund obligations for the next 12 months. No significant principal payments were due before 2020; scheduled debt maturities are concentrated in 2020. The company reported compliance with financial covenants.

Material changes, outlook and risks

  • Cristal acquisition: Tronox agreed to acquire Cristal’s TiO₂ business for $1.673 billion cash, subject to adjustment, plus 37.58 million Class A shares. Closing was expected by Q1 2018, subject to financing, regulatory approvals, customary conditions and shareholder approval. The FTC issued a second request; a $100 million termination fee may apply in specified circumstances if closing has not occurred by May 21, 2018.
  • Alkali sale: On August 2, 2017, after quarter-end, Tronox agreed to sell the Alkali business to Genesis Energy for $1.325 billion cash, subject to adjustment, with closing expected in the second half of 2017. The company expected an approximately $200 million after-tax loss, plus costs to sell. Alkali was still classified as held and used at June 30; beginning in Q3, its assets and liabilities were to be classified as held for sale and results presented as discontinued operations.
  • Management described TiO₂ market conditions as recovering, with successive price increases since Q1 2016, tight supply-demand conditions and inventories at or below normal levels. It expected 2017 zircon sales volumes to exceed 2016. Alkali was described as sold out; the company cited expected global soda ash demand growth of about 2% annually through 2024. These are management expectations, not quantified company earnings guidance.
  • Key exposures include commodity pricing and input costs, foreign exchange (particularly the South African rand and Australian dollar), floating interest rates, customer credit and funding/closing risks associated with the two transactions. A 1% interest-rate increase was estimated to raise annualized pretax loss by about $13 million.
  • New risk disclosures address uncertainty over South African Black Economic Empowerment/mining charter requirements and potential effects of an EU proposal to classify TiO₂ as a Category 2 carcinogen by inhalation. The company said the revised South African charter was under legal challenge and suspended pending the process; the EU Commission had yet to decide on regulatory measures.
  • The filing revised prior-period financial statements for an $11 million aggregate misstatement related to a liability arising from a late statutory filing, which management concluded was not material to those previously issued statements. 2016 comparisons presented here reflect revisions. The six-month 2016 cash flow totals were unchanged.
  • The company said no pending legal or administrative proceeding was then expected to have a material adverse effect, individually or in aggregate. It also disclosed environmental compliance and reclamation obligations, including approximately $80 million secured by Wyoming mine surety bonds.

Important facts for investors to verify

  1. Progress on Cristal’s financing, FTC review and other regulatory and shareholder approvals, including timing and potential termination-fee exposure.
  2. Completion terms and timing of the Alkali sale, net proceeds after adjustments and costs, and the expected approximately $200 million after-tax loss.
  3. Whether stronger TiO₂ pricing and margins persist, and the effect of currency movements, production costs and soda ash pricing and mix.
  4. Liquidity after the ABSA facility’s expiration, the status of its renewal, refinancing plans and covenant headroom against substantial 2020 maturities.
  5. The detailed revised prior-period financial statements and developments in South African mining requirements and proposed EU TiO₂ classification.