UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC annual report, FY2012

Business context and reporting period

Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) filed this Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012. UTI operates 11 U.S. campuses offering technical education in automotive, diesel, collision repair, motorcycle and marine fields, along with manufacturer-sponsored training. Average undergraduate full-time enrollment was approximately 16,500, down from 18,500 in fiscal 2011.

Financial and operating performance

MetricFY2012FY2011
Revenue$413.6 million$451.9 million
Operating income$14.1 million$44.5 million
Operating margin3.4%9.9%
Net income$9.0 million$26.9 million
Diluted EPS$0.36$1.09
EBITDA (non-GAAP)$39.5 million$70.6 million
Cash provided by operating activities$18.5 million$58.1 million

For fiscal Q4 2012, revenue was $101.3 million, operating income $2.3 million and net income $1.6 million, compared with $111.4 million, $9.6 million and $5.6 million, respectively, in Q4 2011.

At September 30, 2012, cash and cash equivalents were $45.7 million, investments totaled $56.0 million, current assets were $135.0 million, current liabilities $99.4 million and working capital $35.5 million. UTI reported no short- or long-term borrowings. Total assets were $268.2 million and shareholders’ equity was $146.1 million. Cash, cash equivalents and current investments together were $97.1 million.

Cash flow from investing activities was an outflow of $16.6 million and financing activities an outflow of $9.9 million. UTI paid $7.4 million in dividends and repurchased $1.8 million of shares. Contractual commitments totaled $319.8 million, principally operating leases ($215.7 million), purchase obligations ($39.9 million) and other long-term obligations ($64.2 million).

Material changes versus the prior comparable period

  • Revenue declined 8.5%, primarily reflecting lower enrollment; average enrollment fell 10.8%. Tuition increases of 3%–5% partly offset the decline.
  • Operating income fell 68% and net income fell 66%. Operating expenses decreased only 1.9%, while operating margin contracted to 3.4% from 9.9%.
  • Operating cash flow fell to $18.5 million from $58.1 million, reflecting lower earnings and working-capital outflows, including increased receivables and lower deferred revenue.
  • Capacity utilization decreased to 58.9% from 62.7%; reported available seats were 28,000 versus 29,500.
  • Employment rates for the 2011 and 2010 graduate cohorts were 82% and 85%, respectively. UTI cited a more challenging hiring market and increased difficulty verifying employment outcomes.
  • UTI revised previously issued financial statements for identified immaterial errors, including prior-period bad debt and compensation accrual items. It states that no affected prior period was materially misstated.

Outlook, commentary and principal risks

Management expected fiscal 2013 applications to improve, but forecast first-half starts to decline before possibly improving in the second half, with full-year starts approximately flat year over year. It anticipated average enrollment declining at a mid-to-high single-digit rate, revenue declining at a low-to-mid single-digit rate despite slightly higher tuition, and operating margin and net income falling from 2012 levels. Management also expected quarterly volatility from seasonality.

UTI planned to expand its Automotive Technology and Diesel Technology II curricula. For fiscal 2013, it anticipated $4.0–$4.4 million of related capital expenditures and approximately $4.4 million of operating expense. Advertising was expected to be 9%–10% of revenue, and bad debt expense 1.4%–1.5% of revenue.

  • Funding and regulation: approximately 75% of revenue on an ED cash basis came from Title IV programs. The institutions’ 90/10 calculations were approximately 74%–75%. Changes to federal aid, accreditation, state authorization, or other compliance requirements could impair student access to funding or UTI’s eligibility.
  • Student financing and credit: UTI bears collection risk on its proprietary loan program. The filing reports approximately $60.2 million of loan commitments; the MD&A cites $40.8 million outstanding, while a financial-statement note reports $42.9 million. The filing says such loans are not recognized on the balance sheet and tuition revenue is recognized as cash is collected.
  • Investigations and claims: the DOJ notified UTI of a preliminary False Claims Act investigation concerning allegations about enrollment-counselor compensation and other matters. UTI also disclosed a DOL whistleblower complaint and a Massachusetts Attorney General investigation concerning alleged false claims tied to student aid at its Norwood campus. Outcomes and potential costs were not estimable; no related liabilities were recorded.
  • Accreditation: Norwood’s renewal application was pending following reported findings; Sacramento’s accreditation was due to expire in December 2012, with a finding UTI said it had remediated. Six of approximately 190 programs did not meet a graduation-rate or employment-rate requirement, though no institution was on reporting status.
  • Execution and cost risks include underutilized campuses, competition, employment outcomes, enrollment and recruitment challenges, proprietary-loan losses, and costs or delays in the Lisle, Illinois campus relocation. UTI retained construction risk and may recognize a financing obligation when the facility is completed.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether enrollment, student starts and graduate employment outcomes improved or deteriorated after fiscal 2012, and whether management’s fiscal 2013 forecast was achieved.
  • The reconciliation and collectability of proprietary student loans, including the filing’s differing $40.8 million and $42.9 million outstanding-balance disclosures and the amount of tuition excluded from revenue.
  • Developments and any financial, operational or eligibility consequences from the DOJ, Massachusetts Attorney General and DOL matters.
  • Renewal status of campus accreditations, program outcome compliance, and the effect of federal student-loan disbursement delays at the Phoenix and Texas institutions.
  • Cash generation, liquidity, fixed lease commitments and the final accounting and costs of the Lisle campus project.
  • The nature and effects of the financial-statement revisions, including the stated immaterial error corrections and any related control or reporting implications.