MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE Corp annual report, FY2011

Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation — Fiscal 2011 Form 10-K

Business context and reporting period

The filing covers the 52-week fiscal year ended December 30, 2011. Marriott Vacations Worldwide (“MVW”) became an independent public company on November 21, 2011, following its spin-off from Marriott International. MVW develops, markets, sells and manages vacation ownership and related residential products under Marriott Vacation Club, Grand Residences by Marriott and Ritz-Carlton brands. It operated 64 properties under 71 management contracts in the United States and eight other countries and territories, serving approximately 420,000 owners.

The filing also reports fourth-quarter results; the fourth quarter comprised 16 weeks. Historical pre-spin-off results were derived from Marriott International and may not represent the costs or financial profile of MVW as a stand-alone public company.

Key financial metrics

Metric20112010Change
Total revenue$1.613 billion$1.584 billionUp 2%
Vacation ownership sales, net$634 million$635 millionDown $1 million
Resort management and other services$238 million$227 millionUp 5%
Financing revenue$169 million$188 millionDown 10%
Rental revenue$212 million$187 millionUp 13%
Net loss attributable to MVW$(178) million$67 million incomeDecline of $245 million
Basic and diluted loss per share$(5.29)$2.00Declined
Adjusted EBITDA$139 million$155 millionDown $16 million
Cash flow from operating activities$321 million$379 millionDown $58 million
Capital expenditures$15 million$24 millionDown $9 million

Fourth-quarter 2011 revenue was $484 million versus $479 million in the prior-year fourth quarter. Fourth-quarter net income attributable to MVW was $8 million versus $18 million in the prior-year quarter. Third-quarter 2011 included the principal impairment charge and reported a $221 million net loss.

Contract sales totaled $680 million in 2011, compared with $685 million in 2010. Company-owned contract sales were $659 million, while joint-venture contract sales were $21 million. Resort occupancy was 90% for the full year, and North America occupancy was 91%.

Balance sheet, debt and liquidity

  • Cash and cash equivalents were $110 million at year-end 2011, compared with $26 million at year-end 2010.
  • Total assets were $2.846 billion, down from $3.642 billion, primarily reflecting inventory impairments and lower deferred tax assets.
  • Total debt was $850 million, down from $1.022 billion. Approximately $847 million was non-recourse debt related to securitized notes receivable and the warehouse facility.
  • MVW had no borrowings outstanding under its $200 million revolving corporate credit facility at year-end.
  • The company established a $300 million non-recourse warehouse credit facility and drew $125 million gross, or $122 million net, against $154 million of securitized notes receivable during October 2011.
  • Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock of a consolidated subsidiary totaled $40 million and carried a 12% annual dividend rate for the first five years.
  • Real estate inventory was $959 million at year-end, including $448 million of finished goods, $215 million of work-in-process and $290 million of land and infrastructure.
  • Contractual obligations totaled $1.484 billion, including $988 million of debt obligations, $88 million of preferred-stock obligations and $247 million related to the Marriott Rewards loyalty program.

Material changes versus the prior comparable period

  • Revenue growth came primarily from rental revenue, including $27 million of revenue recognized from MVCD “plus points,” and higher resort management fees and cost reimbursements.
  • Financing revenue declined because collections on existing notes receivable exceeded new originations; the average notes receivable balance fell to $1.391 billion from $1.555 billion.
  • North America contract sales declined 3% to $514 million. Sales were weaker in the first half as MVCD enrollment focused on existing owners purchasing at lower average prices, while second-half volume per guest improved.
  • Revenue from vacation ownership sales remained broadly flat despite lower contract sales because of more favorable revenue reportability and lower notes-receivable reserve activity.
  • Rental profitability remained negative, with rental revenue less expenses at a loss of $8 million versus a loss of $7 million. Higher revenue was offset by costs associated with the MVCD banking and borrowing feature and increased variable operating costs.
  • Adjusted EBITDA declined to $139 million from $155 million, although reported EBITDA was $(134) million because of the large impairment charge.
  • Inventory fell by $453 million, primarily due to the write-down of excess land and luxury inventory and reduced development activity.
  • Cash flow from operations declined despite lower inventory spending, reflecting lower earnings, reduced notes-receivable collections and working-capital changes.

Guidance, outlook, risks and unusual items

For 2012 executive incentive purposes, management set an Adjusted EBITDA target of $125 million and a Development Margin target of 12.0%. These are compensation-plan targets, not formal investor guidance.

  • Management planned to increase marketing to new owners after emphasizing existing-owner MVCD enrollment in 2010 and 2011.
  • MVW intended to align inventory development more closely with sales pace, dispose of excess land and luxury inventory, and pursue asset-light development and management opportunities.
  • No new luxury development was planned, and the company was focusing Europe on selling existing products and managing existing resorts. Asia Pacific remained a targeted growth opportunity.
  • MVW recorded a $324 million pre-tax, non-cash impairment charge, or $234 million after tax, primarily for excess undeveloped land and built luxury inventory. The charge included $251 million for inventory and $73 million for property and equipment.
  • MVW’s license agreements require ongoing use of Marriott and Ritz-Carlton standards and provide for royalty payments, including a fixed fee of $50 million annually plus percentage-based fees. The filing recorded $4 million of royalty expense in 2011 after the spin-off.
  • Key risks include weak consumer demand, secondary-market pricing pressure, consumer loan defaults, dependence on securitization markets, inventory depletion under points-based programs, extensive regulation, travel disruption, real estate valuation declines and potential termination of brand license agreements.
  • Three securitized loan pools breached performance triggers during 2011; two were cured by year-end. Approximately $3 million of cash flows were redirected to investors during the year.
  • The filing restated prior-year cash-flow classifications for 2010 and 2009; management considered the errors immaterial to the prior-period financial statements.
  • Management concluded disclosure controls were effective. The filing did not include management’s internal-control assessment or an auditor attestation because of the SEC transition period for newly public companies.

Most important facts to verify

  • Whether the $139 million Adjusted EBITDA adequately reflects recurring operations after excluding impairments and consumer-financing interest.
  • The sustainability of operating cash flow as notes receivable continue to run off and securitization funding remains important.
  • Actual losses and recovery values associated with the $959 million inventory balance, particularly excess land and luxury inventory.
  • Performance of securitized loan pools, default trends and the renewal or refinancing of the warehouse facility after its revolving period.
  • The effect of the $50 million annual brand-license fee and percentage royalties on future margins and cash flow.
  • Whether post-spin-off corporate, technology, public-company and transition-service costs will exceed historical allocated expenses.
  • Potential obligations under the $40 million preferred stock, tax-sharing and indemnification agreements, guarantees, joint-venture commitments and other contractual obligations.
  • Whether the company’s historical financial statements are comparable to future stand-alone results, given the November 2011 spin-off and prior Marriott cost allocations.