VEEVA SYSTEMS INC current report, 17 June 2015

Business Context and Reporting Period

This Form 8-K reports on the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held by Veeva Systems Inc. on June 17, 2015. The filing details the voting results for four proposals presented to stockholders of record as of April 28, 2015.

Key Financial Metrics

The filing text does not provide a clear value for revenue, profit, cash flow, margins, debt, or liquidity. This document focuses exclusively on corporate governance and voting outcomes.

Material Changes and Voting Results

Stockholders voted on four proposals with the following outcomes:

  • Proposal 1 (Election of Directors): Mark Armenante and Gordon Ritter were elected as Class II directors. Armenante received 575,395,442 votes "For" and Ritter received 569,454,831 votes "For."
  • Proposal 2 (Ratification of Auditors): Stockholders ratified the appointment of KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2016, with 591,432,972 votes "For."
  • Proposal 3 (Executive Compensation): Stockholders approved the advisory vote on named executive officer compensation with 575,726,457 votes "For."
  • Proposal 4 (Frequency of Compensation Votes): Stockholders voted to hold advisory votes on executive compensation every three years, with 538,200,234 votes for the "Three Years" option.

Guidance, Outlook, and Management Commentary

Based on the voting results for Proposal 4, the Board of Directors adopted a policy to hold tri-annual advisory votes on executive compensation. The next required advisory vote on the frequency of these approvals is scheduled to take place no later than the 2021 annual meeting of stockholders.

Important Facts for Investors to Verify

  • Confirmation of the new tri-annual schedule for executive compensation advisory votes.
  • The specific terms of the engagement with KPMG LLP for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2016.
  • The tenure of the newly elected Class II directors, which extends until the 2018 annual meeting.
  • The significant disparity in voting power between Class A (1 vote per share) and Class B (10 votes per share) stockholders.