VISTA GOLD CORP annual report, FY2014

Vista Gold Corp. — FY2014 Form 10-K

Reporting period: Year ended December 31, 2014; the filing also reports quarterly results. Dollar amounts are U.S. dollars in thousands unless stated otherwise. Vista is an exploration and development-stage gold company, not a gold producer, and reported no revenue in 2014, 2013 or 2012.

Financial performance and position

Metric20142013
Revenue$0$0
Net loss$18,926$59,488
Basic loss per share$0.23$0.73
Cash used in operating activities$7,058$24,509
Cash and cash equivalents at year-end$3,714$5,475
Working capital$8,619$8,622
Total assets$28,026$53,094
Total liabilities$2,743$10,081
Debt at year-end$0$6,506

Fourth-quarter 2014 revenue was $0 and net loss was $9,959, versus a $8,040 loss in fourth-quarter 2013. The 2014 loss included $4,813 impairment of the Amayapampa interest and $750 impairment of Long Valley, partly offset by lower project and corporate costs. A $4,267 unrealized loss on Midas Gold shares also reduced earnings. The annual loss improvement largely reflected a much smaller unrealized Midas investment loss than in 2013, when that loss was $48,499, as well as reduced spending. No operating margins are meaningful because there was no revenue.

Operating cash use declined substantially following cost reductions and completion of major Mt Todd study, permitting and water-treatment activities. Investing activities provided $11,641, mainly from the net $10,560 sale of Midas Gold shares; financing activities used $6,344, principally for repayment of the 2013 loan facility. The facility was repaid in full during 2014. The company had no material contractual obligations reported at year-end, but disclosed a $250 accrued contract-dispute contingency.

Business, projects and material developments

  • Mt Todd, Australia: Vista’s principal asset. The NT Government extended the project agreement through December 2018. The environmental impact statement was approved in September 2014, subject to recommendations; additional authorizations and an approved Mine Management Plan remain necessary. Vista had not completed a feasibility study or made a construction decision.
  • Mt Todd economics are study estimates, not current guidance: The May 2013 PFS presented a 50,000-tonne-per-day base case with estimated initial capital of $1.046 billion, 13-year mine life, average life-of-mine cash costs of $773 per ounce, and after-tax NPV at 5% of $591.3 million at $1,450 gold. A smaller 33,000-tonne-per-day case estimated $761 million initial capital and $684 per ounce life-of-mine cash costs. These estimates rely on assumptions, including gold prices and exchange rates, and require substantial financing. The filing cautions that the reported Canadian-standard reserves/resources are not necessarily comparable to SEC Industry Guide 7 reserves.
  • Vista said current gold prices did not justify project development or completing the feasibility study. It planned to focus in 2015 on optimization, care and maintenance, and limited field activity; a feasibility study was estimated to take four to six months and cost approximately $2.5 million if conditions improve.
  • The NT Government committed non-recourse funding for the first year of a proposed multi-year program to reduce acidic metalliferous water inventory at Mt Todd by 70%. Initial work was planned through approximately July 2015. Future funding and the government’s continued cost-sharing are not assured.
  • Other assets and transactions: Vista optioned Guadalupe de los Reyes, Mexico, to Cangold, which may earn 70% by making optional payments totaling $5 million over three years and meeting other conditions. The filing reports $500 received in 2014 and another $500 received in February 2015; later payments are contingent. In January 2015, Vista received $3 million as full and final payment for its Los Cardones interest. The company also held Midas Gold shares and royalties in Bolivia and Indonesia.

Liquidity, outlook and key risks

Management estimated company-wide cash requirements of $1,500–$1,750 per quarter through 2015, assuming no material discretionary programs and a normal wet season. Management expected year-end cash, the $3,000 Los Cardones payment received in January 2015, approximately $2,800 net proceeds expected from a February 2015 sale of 8 million Midas Gold shares, and the $500 Guadalupe payment received in February to fund operations through most of 2016. These are estimates, not assured funding: asset-sale proceeds, option payments and monetization of mill equipment or remaining investments may be delayed, reduced or unavailable.

  • The company has a history of losses, no producing assets and no operating cash flow; continuing viability depends on funding, asset dispositions and eventual profitable operations. The financial statements are prepared on a going-concern basis and do not include adjustments that might be needed if the company cannot continue as a going concern.
  • Management said financing for non-producing mining companies remained difficult. Vista planned to prioritize non-dilutive funding, while retaining the ability to issue up to $50 million of securities under filed offering documents.
  • Key exposures include gold-price and foreign-exchange volatility, project financing and feasibility, permitting and construction delays, water supply and acidic drainage, reclamation and bonding obligations, environmental regulation, and risks associated with third-party option and joint-venture partners. Vista does not hedge currency risk.
  • The company believed it was a passive foreign investment company (PFIC) in 2014 and considered PFIC status likely in 2015, potentially creating adverse U.S. tax consequences for U.S. shareholders.
  • Management and the auditor reported effective internal control over financial reporting; the 2014 financial statements received an unqualified audit opinion. Vista changed auditors in June 2014 as part of cost-reduction efforts.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether the reported post-year-end Los Cardones, Midas Gold-share and Guadalupe proceeds were received in full, and the resulting current cash, share holdings and liquidity runway.
  • Whether Cangold makes future Guadalupe option payments and fulfills its project obligations.
  • Mt Todd’s remaining permit requirements, feasibility-study timing and cost, financing plan, and whether project economics remain viable at current gold prices and exchange rates.
  • Scope, cost-sharing and results of the Mt Todd water-management program, including funding after its first year and any resulting environmental or reclamation liabilities.
  • Sale prospects and realizable value of the mill equipment and other non-core assets; the filing carries the mill equipment at $6.5 million using a Level 3 valuation.
  • Potential settlement of the $250 contract dispute, future cash needs, and the assumptions supporting management’s expected funding runway through most of 2016.