BV Financial, Inc. quarterly report, Q2 FY2023

Business context and reporting period

BV Financial, Inc. is the holding company for BayVanguard Bank, a community bank serving the Baltimore metropolitan area and Maryland’s Eastern Shore. This unaudited Form 10-Q covers the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2023; comparisons are with the corresponding 2022 periods or December 31, 2022, as applicable. Dollar amounts below are in millions unless noted.

After quarter-end, on July 31, 2023, the Company completed its conversion from a mutual holding company structure and sold 9.799 million shares at $10 per share. The offering generated approximately $98 million gross and $95 million net proceeds. The M.H.C. ceased to exist; the Company reported approximately 11.375 million shares outstanding as of August 11, versus 7.430 million at June 30.

Financial results and condition

MetricQ2 2023Q2 2022Six months 2023Six months 2022
Interest income$10.5$8.0$20.2$15.4
Net interest income$8.2$7.2$16.4$13.7
Net income$3.9$2.8$7.0$5.2
Diluted earnings per share$0.52$0.37$0.94$0.70
Net interest margin4.19%3.70%4.26%3.59%
  • Q2 net interest income rose 14.9%; net income rose 41.0%. For the six months, net interest income increased 19.9% and net income increased 35.4%.
  • Higher loan yields and average loan balances, along with higher yields on cash and other interest-earning assets, lifted interest income. Deposit costs and FHLB borrowing costs rose substantially, partially offsetting the increase.
  • Noninterest income was $1.4 million in Q2, including a $678,000 gain on sale of foreclosed real estate. Six-month noninterest income was $2.2 million. Noninterest expense was $4.5 million in Q2 and $9.2 million for the six months.
  • At June 30, total assets were $920.8 million, up 8.9% from year-end; net loans were $694.8 million, up 5.4%. Commercial investor real estate loans were $270.3 million, or 38.4% of total loans; total real estate loans were 92.9% of the portfolio.
  • Cash and cash equivalents were $110.3 million, versus $68.7 million at year-end. Deposits were $670.1 million, down 2.1%; noninterest-bearing deposits fell $21.5 million while interest-bearing deposits rose $7.0 million. FHLB borrowings increased to $37.5 million from $12.0 million; subordinated debentures were $37.1 million.
  • Stockholders’ equity was $104.5 million. The Bank’s actual capital ratios were 13.68% Tier 1 leverage, 17.05% Tier 1 risk-based and common equity Tier 1, and 18.29% total risk-based capital; the filing states the Bank exceeded regulatory requirements and was well capitalized.
  • Six-month operating cash flow was $61.0 million, investing cash use was $34.5 million, and financing cash provided was $15.1 million. Operating cash flow included a $54.0 million increase in other liabilities, which management attributed primarily to funds collected for the subsequent capital raise; therefore, reported operating cash flow should not be viewed as solely recurring operating cash generation.

Material changes, outlook, risks and unusual items

  • The allowance for credit losses was $8.2 million at June 30, compared with $3.8 million at year-end. The ratio to total loans was 1.16%; nonaccrual loans decreased to $4.5 million, or 0.65% of loans, from $5.9 million, or 0.88%. The Company recorded a $150,000 recovery of credit losses in Q2 and a $147,000 recovery for the six months.
  • Adoption of CECL on January 1 reduced retained earnings by $547,000 after tax and increased the loan allowance; the filing identifies significant management judgment and estimation uncertainty in the allowance.
  • Q2 earnings included the $678,000 foreclosed-real-estate sale gain. Six-month 2022 results included a $694,000 bargain-purchase gain, loan prepayment penalties and branch-sale gain, making some year-over-year noninterest comparisons less representative of recurring performance.
  • Management cited deposit retention and pricing, access to FHLB advances, and loan and securities cash flows as liquidity sources. It expects sufficient funds for current commitments and anticipates retaining a significant portion of maturing time deposits; if retention is weaker, it may use additional FHLB funding or raise deposit rates, increasing interest expense. FHLB availability was reported as $74.6 million, with $37.5 million outstanding and $40.0 million in unfunded letters of credit against the line.
  • Key disclosed risks include funding costs and deposit mix, uninsured deposits, interest-rate and securities valuation changes, commercial real estate and regional economic conditions, credit-loss estimates, and operational, technology and cybersecurity risks. Two local-government relationships represented 3.5% and 3.2% of deposits; CDs of $250,000 or more totaled $47.9 million and may not be FDIC-insured.
  • No specific earnings or financial guidance was provided. Management reported effective disclosure controls and no material change in internal control over financial reporting. It stated that ordinary-course legal proceedings were not expected to have a material adverse effect.

Important facts for investors to verify

  1. Review the July 31 conversion and offering: final share count, use of approximately $95 million net proceeds, the $47.5 million investment in the Bank, and the resulting effect on per-share comparisons and capital.
  2. Assess deposit stability, uninsured and large-account concentrations, upcoming CD maturities, and whether the Bank’s funding needs increase reliance on higher-cost deposits or FHLB advances.
  3. Monitor commercial real estate exposure, criticized/substandard loans, nonaccrual and past-due trends, collateral values, and whether the CECL allowance remains adequate as the portfolio and economic outlook change.
  4. Evaluate the sustainability of net interest margin and earnings as asset yields, deposit costs and borrowings reprice; distinguish recurring results from the foreclosed-property gain and other unusual items.
  5. Reconcile cash-flow quality and the $54.0 million increase in other liabilities associated primarily with capital-raise funds. Also note the cover-page response indicating the Company had not filed all required Exchange Act reports during the preceding 12 months, and verify the context and any subsequent compliance updates.