GREENE COUNTY BANCORP INC quarterly report, Q1 FY2021

Greene County Bancorp, Inc. — Form 10-Q Summary

Reporting period: The filing covers the three months ended September 30, 2020, the company’s fiscal first quarter of fiscal 2021—not calendar 2020 Q1 as stated in the request metadata. Financial statements are unaudited. Greene County Bancorp operates community banking businesses in New York’s Hudson Valley and Capital District regions.

Financial results and position

  • Earnings: Net income was $4.875 million, versus $4.863 million a year earlier; diluted EPS was $0.57 in both periods. Pretax income declined to $5.518 million from $5.793 million, while the income tax provision fell to $643,000 from $930,000.
  • Interest income and margin: Interest income increased 5.8% to $13.338 million. Lower funding costs reduced interest expense 27.8% to $1.522 million, lifting net interest income 12.5% to $11.816 million. The reported net interest margin fell to 2.79% from 3.26%; tax-equivalent margin was 2.98% versus 3.44%.
  • Credit provision and expenses: The provision for loan losses rose to $1.243 million from $551,000. Noninterest income declined 8.3% to $2.078 million, while noninterest expense rose 11.1% to $7.133 million. Salaries and benefits increased, partly reflecting staffing for a new branch; 2019 FDIC expense included a credit.
  • Balance sheet: At September 30, total assets were $1.799 billion, up $122.3 million (7.3%) from June 30. Net loans were $1.029 billion, up 3.5%; deposits were $1.619 billion, up 7.9%. Cash and cash equivalents were $76.2 million. Shareholders’ equity was $133.0 million, or 7.39% of assets.
  • Cash flow: Operating activities provided $5.5 million; investing activities used $87.5 million; financing activities provided $117.7 million. Cash and cash equivalents increased $35.7 million during the quarter to $76.2 million.
  • Debt and liquidity: The company issued $20 million of subordinated notes in September at a 4.75% fixed-to-floating rate, due in 2030 and callable in 2025; the reported carrying amount, net of issuance costs, was $19.6 million. FHLB borrowings were $6.1 million, with no short-term borrowings outstanding. Management reported $295.5 million of unused lines of credit, plus $100.5 million of available PPPLF capacity, and said it expected sufficient funds to meet current loan commitments.
  • Capital and shareholder returns: The Bank of Greene County and Greene County Commercial Bank met applicable regulatory capital requirements. The company paid a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share and declared another $0.12 dividend after quarter-end.

Material changes and credit quality

  • Compared with the prior-year quarter, average interest-earning assets grew substantially, but asset yields declined amid low interest rates. Management said the low-rate environment is expected to continue pressuring the company’s spread and margin during fiscal 2021.
  • Gross loans grew by $36.5 million from June 30, led by commercial real estate and residential real estate. Commercial real estate was 39.6% of gross loans at quarter-end.
  • The allowance for loan losses increased to $17.6 million from $16.4 million. The allowance was 1.68% of gross loans, or 1.85% excluding SBA-guaranteed PPP loans. Net charge-offs were $38,000, compared with $307,000 a year earlier.
  • Nonaccrual loans were $4.3 million, compared with $4.1 million at June 30; nonperforming assets were 0.24% of total assets. Loans rated substandard or special mention increased to $38.9 million from $32.8 million, primarily due to weaker borrower cash flow; the newly classified loans were performing at quarter-end. No loans were rated doubtful or loss.

Outlook, risks and unusual items

  • COVID-19: Payment deferrals had fallen to $67.4 million across 201 loans from $193.5 million across 706 loans at June 30. Deferrals were not reported as delinquent under applicable guidance, and interest continued to be recognized. Management cautioned that borrower performance after deferrals remained uncertain and increased its loan-loss provision in response to pandemic risks, loan growth and higher adversely classified balances.
  • The company had $100.5 million of PPP loans outstanding at September 30; these loans are 100% SBA-guaranteed. Management said it was stress-testing the portfolio and adjusting reserves as needed. The filing identifies potential effects of COVID-19 on borrower repayment, business demand and operating costs.
  • Management highlighted interest-rate and credit risks. A portfolio with a significant fixed-rate residential mortgage component exposes earnings to rate changes; management said its interest-rate sensitivity remained within established limits. Other stated risks include economic conditions, deposit flows, competition, regulation and changes in portfolio quality.
  • Available-for-sale securities had $269.7 million in fair value and held-to-maturity securities had $413.6 million in estimated fair value, versus $390.1 million carrying value. Management attributed unrealized losses to interest rates, wider credit spreads—including pandemic concerns—and market illiquidity; it concluded the securities were not other-than-temporarily impaired.
  • The company reported no material legal proceedings. Disclosure controls were assessed as effective, with no reported material change in internal control over financial reporting. The company had not yet quantified the expected financial-position effect of adopting CECL, though it anticipated a significant change to its allowance methodology.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • How the remaining payment-deferral loans perform after relief ends, particularly among commercial borrowers, and whether provision levels and the allowance adequately reflect expected losses.
  • Whether the increase in classified loans and nonaccrual balances persists, and how concentrated commercial real estate exposure affects credit risk.
  • How continued low interest rates and asset repricing affect net interest margin, funding costs and earnings.
  • The terms, regulatory-capital treatment and future cost of the $20 million subordinated notes, and the availability of reported contingent liquidity facilities.
  • The company’s CECL implementation timetable and estimated transition impact; the filing says the impact had not yet been calculated.
  • The reporting-period discrepancy in the request metadata: the filing is for the quarter ended September 30, 2020, not calendar 2020 Q1.