GREENE COUNTY BANCORP INC annual report, FY2018

Greene County Bancorp, Inc. — FY2018 Form 10-K

Reporting period: Fiscal year ended June 30, 2018. Although the request references 2017 Q4, this filing reports FY2018 and includes quarterly data; it is not a standalone calendar-quarter filing. The company is a New York Hudson Valley community banking holding company, with 14 full-service branches at year-end and a municipal-deposit subsidiary.

Financial performance and position

MetricFY2018 / June 30, 2018Prior comparable periodChange
Total assets$1.151 billion$982.3 million+17.2%
Net loans$704.4 million$624.2 million+12.9%
Total securities$395.6 million$315.3 million+25.5%
Deposits$1.025 billion$859.5 million+19.3%
FHLB borrowings$18.2 million$29.6 million−$11.4 million
Net interest income$34.9 million$30.4 million+14.9%
Net income$14.4 million$11.2 million+28.8%
Basic / diluted EPS$1.69 / $1.69$1.32 / $1.31Higher
  • Net interest margin was 3.31%, down from 3.39%; spread was 3.23%, down from 3.32%. Tax-equivalent margin was 3.52%, versus 3.64%.
  • Return on average assets increased to 1.34% from 1.22%; return on average equity increased to 16.09% from 14.25%. Efficiency ratio improved to 52.75% from 54.25%.
  • Net cash provided by operating activities was $20.7 million; investing activities used $163.4 million and financing activities provided $152.9 million. Cash and cash equivalents ended at $26.5 million, or 2.3% of assets.
  • Shareholders’ equity was $96.2 million, 8.35% of assets, compared with $83.5 million and 8.50% a year earlier. The bank and municipal bank were reported well-capitalized; the Bank of Greene County’s total risk-based capital ratio was 15.5% and CET1 ratio was 14.2%.

Material changes and drivers

  • Loan growth centered on commercial real estate, commercial business, construction, and multifamily lending. Commercial real estate was 39.7% of gross loans; all real estate loans together were 84.4%.
  • Deposit growth included a $96.6 million increase in municipal deposits at Greene County Commercial Bank and strong NOW-account growth. Municipal deposits and seasonal municipal funding needs are significant liquidity considerations.
  • Interest income rose 16.1%, largely on higher average loan and securities balances. Interest expense rose 30.5% as interest-bearing liabilities grew and deposit costs increased, contributing to margin compression.
  • Noninterest income increased 16.5%, led by deposit service charges, debit-card fees, and investment services. Noninterest expense rose 12.0%, principally from staffing, growth-related costs, online banking services, and municipal letters of credit.
  • Provision for loan losses declined to $1.53 million from $1.91 million, while net charge-offs increased to $528,000 from $374,000. The allowance was $12.0 million, or 1.68% of gross loans, versus 1.74%.

Outlook, risks, and unusual items

  • No formal earnings or financial guidance is provided. Management cited continued loan growth and customer relationships, but anticipated that rising long-term rates could reduce new loan demand and refinancing activity. A 15th branch in Woodstock was planned to open in September 2018.
  • Interest-rate risk is a key exposure: retained fixed-rate mortgages can pressure earnings if deposit and borrowing costs rise. Management reported positive cumulative one- and three-year gap positions of 21.36% and 20.19% of interest-earning assets, respectively, but modeled EVE declines of 17.89% under an immediate +300-basis-point shock. Management identifies declining rates as the greatest net-interest-income sensitivity risk; modeled results depend on assumptions.
  • Credit risks include commercial real estate and construction concentration, larger and more complex commercial relationships, local economic and property-value weakness, and borrower stress as adjustable rates reset. Special-mention loans rose to $11.7 million from $555,000; management said these loans were performing. Substandard loans were $5.7 million. Nonperforming assets declined to $3.7 million (0.32% of assets), while impaired loans increased to $4.1 million from $3.3 million.
  • The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act reduced the federal corporate rate to 21%; the company recorded a $251,000 tax benefit from remeasurement of deferred taxes. The effective tax rate fell to 22.1% from 25.1%.
  • Available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities had $4.1 million of gross unrealized losses at year-end; management concluded there was no other-than-temporary impairment. No securities were sold in FY2018.
  • Unfunded loan commitments and unused lines totaled $95.5 million. FHLB letters of credit of $40.0 million supported municipal deposits. Management expected available funds to meet current commitments. Routine legal proceedings were described as immaterial; no other material proceedings were disclosed.
  • The board later approved a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share, an annualized $0.40 rate, up 2.6% from $0.39; it was paid August 31, 2018. Future dividends and mutual-holding-company dividend waivers remain subject to regulatory and member approvals.
  • The auditor issued unqualified opinions on the financial statements and internal control over financial reporting. Bonadio & Co. was the auditor for FY2018 and stated it had served since 2018; management and the auditor assessed internal control as effective.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether the rapid growth in commercial real estate, construction, commercial lending, and municipal deposits is sustained without weakening underwriting or liquidity.
  • The composition and migration of the $11.7 million special-mention portfolio, the increase in impaired loans, and whether the allowance remains adequate as loans grow.
  • Deposit pricing and retention, particularly municipal balances and NOW accounts, and the effect of further rate increases on funding costs and net interest margin.
  • The company’s interest-rate modeling assumptions and securities valuation exposure, including unrealized losses and the stated EVE sensitivity.
  • The realized impact of the tax-law change, adoption of CECL (for which management expected a significant methodological impact but had not quantified the allowance effect), and future dividend-waiver approvals.