MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA INC annual report, FY2012

Business Context and Reporting Period

Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. filed this Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012. The filing substantially reflects the May 6, 2011 acquisition of Fenco, which added under-the-car products including steering components, brakes, hubs and bearings, and clutches. Results are reported for two segments: rotating electrical and under-the-car product line. The source metadata refers to “2011 Q4,” but the filing is an annual report for fiscal 2012.

Financial Performance and Position

MetricFiscal 2012Fiscal 2011Change or comment
Net sales$363.7 million$161.3 millionUp 125.5%, primarily from Fenco
Gross profit$27.7 million$51.4 millionGross margin declined to 7.6% from 31.9%
Operating income$(27.5) million$25.4 millionTurned to an operating loss
Net income$(48.5) million$12.2 millionBasic and diluted EPS were $(3.90)
Net cash from operations$(38.5) million$10.7 millionUnder-the-car operations used $54.0 million
Capital expenditures$1.6 million$1.6 millionFiscal 2013 expected at approximately $3 million to $4 million
Cash$32.6 million$2.5 millionSupported substantially by financing activities
Working capital$(2.2) million$1.4 millionCurrent ratio approximately 1:1
Total assets$501.9 million$191.9 millionIncrease reflects Fenco acquisition and core inventory
Shareholders’ equity$73.6 million$117.2 millionReduced by the fiscal 2012 net loss

Rotating electrical remained profitable, generating $14.3 million of net income and $15.5 million of operating cash flow. The under-the-car segment generated $185.1 million of sales but incurred a $62.8 million net loss, a negative 16.0% gross margin, and $54.0 million of negative operating cash flow.

Debt, Liquidity, and Working Capital

  • At March 31, 2012, debt included $48.9 million outstanding under the Fenco revolving facility and $85.0 million of term loans, including the current portion.
  • Approximately $16.2 million was available under the parent-company revolving facility; approximately $0.9 million was available under the Fenco revolving facility.
  • The company entered into new parent-company financing in January 2012, consisting of $75.0 million of term loans and a revolving facility of up to $20.0 million. The loans mature in January 2017 and are secured substantially by rotating-electrical assets.
  • Receivables discounted under customer programs increased to $280.3 million from $134.9 million. The related discount expense was $7.1 million, compared with $4.8 million in fiscal 2011.
  • Long-term core inventory increased to $194.4 million from $80.6 million, while the long-term customer core-return liability was $113.7 million. These classifications materially affect reported working capital.
  • Management stated that available cash, receivable discount programs, credit facilities, strategic financing, and subsequent equity proceeds were expected to fund requirements for the next twelve months, but noted dependence on operating performance, customers, suppliers, and the turnaround plan.

Material Changes Versus the Prior Comparable Period

  • Sales increased by $202.4 million, including $185.1 million from Fenco and $17.3 million of growth in rotating electrical sales.
  • Consolidated gross margin fell sharply because the under-the-car segment experienced low selling prices, customer allowances, fill-rate penalties, excess production and logistics costs, and premium freight and inventory purchases.
  • Fiscal 2012 included approximately $10.9 million of negative impact from discontinuing the CV axle product line, including a $4.9 million core and raw-material inventory reserve. The related Bedford, New Hampshire facility was shut down and $1.0 million of plant and equipment was impaired.
  • Other under-the-car items affecting gross profit included $4.8 million of customer penalties, $1.9 million of one-time pricing allowance, $1.3 million of product buyback allowances, $4.2 million of employee replacement and training costs, $2.5 million of above-normal inventory purchase costs, $0.8 million of additional inbound freight, and $3.7 million of acquired inventory fair-value step-up amortization.
  • Customer allowances recorded as reductions of revenue increased to $45.9 million from $33.0 million.
  • Operating expenses increased to $55.2 million from $26.0 million, and net interest expense increased to $14.3 million from $5.4 million because of higher leverage and Fenco financing.
  • The company retrospectively adjusted previously reported fiscal 2012 quarterly results for acquisition accounting estimates, including inventory, receivables, customer core-return accruals, and intangible assets. The adjusted quarterly net losses were $8.3 million, $5.4 million, $21.8 million, and $12.9 million, respectively.

Outlook, Management Commentary, Risks, and Unusual Items

  • Management’s primary objective was to execute a turnaround plan for the under-the-car business, focused on customer service, product quality, product rationalization, lean manufacturing, logistics productivity, and cost savings. Substantial completion was expected in the first quarter of fiscal 2014, although management stated that the plan had taken longer and cost more than anticipated.
  • The company discontinued the CV axle product line and certain other offerings, and expected continued efforts to normalize inventory and improve gross margins, but provided no quantified earnings guidance.
  • Customer concentration is significant: the four largest customers represented approximately 70% of fiscal 2012 sales, and AutoZone represented approximately 41%. Loss of a major customer or further pricing and allowance pressure could materially affect results.
  • Management identified a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting related to Fenco’s financial close process, accounting systems, reconciliation oversight, and accounting personnel. Ernst & Young issued an adverse opinion on internal control, although it issued an unqualified opinion on the consolidated financial statements.
  • The filing was delayed, and NASDAQ issued notices concerning failure to timely file the Form 10-K and prior Form 10-Q reports. The company submitted a compliance plan and received lender waivers related to reporting requirements.
  • In April 2012, the company raised $15.0 million gross, or $14.1 million net, through a private placement of 1.936 million shares at $7.75 per share. The resale registration statement had been filed but was not effective as of the filing date; failure to meet registration obligations could trigger liquidated damages.
  • In August 2012, the company guaranteed up to $22.0 million of a supplier credit line for Fenco. The arrangement includes a potential cash settlement at 135% of certain obligations or settlement in shares, together with a warrant for up to 516,129 shares at an initial exercise price of $7.75.
  • Fenco had approximately $51.0 million of past-due supplier payables as of September 21, 2012, and the outcome of negotiations was uncertain.
  • Other risks include shortages of used cores and components, raw-material price increases, foreign-exchange exposure, offshore operating risks, variable interest rates, competition, customer returns, potential goodwill or long-lived-asset impairment, and covenant compliance.

Important Facts for Investors to Verify

  • Verify the sustainability of the rotating electrical segment’s profitability and whether the under-the-car turnaround achieves positive gross margin and operating cash flow.
  • Review Fenco’s liquidity, supplier arrears, borrowing-base availability, covenant compliance, and the company’s future funding requirements.
  • Assess the effect of customer concentration, pricing concessions, marketing allowances, return rights, and core inventory obligations on revenue quality and cash conversion.
  • Examine the material weakness remediation, the timeliness and accuracy of subsequent SEC filings, and any further restatements or reporting delays.
  • Evaluate dilution and contingent cash obligations from the private placement, supplier settlement option, and warrants.
  • Reconcile reported cash with negative working capital, receivable discounting, long-term core inventory classifications, and debt maturities.
  • Confirm whether the company achieved its stated fiscal 2013 capital-expenditure range and fiscal 2014 turnaround timetable; the filing provides no clear quantified earnings guidance.