PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP annual report, FY2013

Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation — 2013 Form 10-K

Reporting period: Fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. The company is a New Jersey bank holding company operating through Peapack-Gladstone Bank, with banking and wealth-management businesses concentrated in New Jersey and the New York City area. Wealth-management assets under administration were $2.69 billion at year-end.

Financial performance and position

Metric20132012
Interest income$57.1 million$56.1 million
Net interest income$52.8 million$51.4 million
Net interest margin3.26%3.50%
Provision for loan losses$3.4 million$8.3 million
Net income$9.3 million$9.7 million
Net income available to common shareholders$9.3 million$9.2 million
Diluted EPS$1.01$1.05
Total assets at year-end$1.97 billion$1.67 billion
Total loans at year-end$1.57 billion$1.13 billion
Total deposits at year-end$1.65 billion$1.52 billion
  • Return on average assets was 0.54%, versus 0.61%; return on average common equity was 7.37%, versus 8.03%.
  • Operating cash flow was $32.7 million. Investing activities used $407.7 million, principally reflecting $445.5 million of net loan growth; financing activities provided $290.9 million. Cash and cash equivalents ended the year at $35.1 million, down from $119.2 million.
  • Shareholders’ equity was $170.7 million, or 8.68% of assets. Regulatory capital ratios were 15.33% total risk-based, 14.07% Tier 1 risk-based and 9.00% Tier 1 leverage; the Bank reported it remained well capitalized.
  • Year-end borrowings included $74.7 million of FHLB advances and $54.9 million of overnight borrowings; capital lease obligations were $8.8 million. Available borrowing capacity included $472.5 million from the FHLB and $29.2 million from correspondent banks.
  • Average loans to average deposits rose to 83.05% from 76.39%. The allowance for loan losses was $15.4 million, equal to 0.98% of loans.

Material changes and significant items

  • Loans grew 39% year over year, with commercial mortgages rising to $832.0 million. Multifamily lending was a key growth driver; commercial and industrial lending was expanded under a new platform.
  • Deposits grew 8.6%, with management emphasizing core relationship deposits and reporting a shift away from higher-cost certificates of deposit.
  • Asset quality improved: nonperforming loans fell to $6.6 million from $11.7 million; nonperforming assets declined to $8.6 million from $15.2 million, or 0.44% of assets versus 0.91%.
  • Net interest income increased, helped by higher loan volume and lower funding costs, but margin compressed by 24 basis points as asset yields fell. Lower loan-loss provision supported earnings; strategic-plan expenses and other operating costs increased.
  • Operating expenses rose 14% to $55.2 million, including salaries and benefits of $32.2 million, up $4.7 million. The company attributed much of the increase to strategic hiring and implementation costs; a $933,000 compensation accrual related to staff restructuring was recorded. A $1.0 million provision was also recorded for one OREO property.
  • The company raised $41.1 million net through a December rights offering and standby-investor sale of 2,470,588 shares at $17 per share. This materially strengthened capital but increased share count.
  • Unrealized available-for-sale securities gains fell substantially: year-end accumulated other comprehensive income was $23,000, compared with $4.3 million in 2012. No securities impairment charges were recognized in 2013.
  • The allowance methodology was changed to equal weighting of the prior three years’ loss experience and related criticized-loan migration data; management estimated this increased the allowance by approximately $1 million.
  • Fourth-quarter 2013 net income was $2.4 million and diluted EPS was $0.25, compared with $1.1 million and $0.12 in fourth-quarter 2012. Fourth-quarter 2013 provision was $1.3 million and operating expenses were $14.6 million.

Outlook, risks and contingencies

  • The board-approved “Expanding Our Reach” plan focuses on organic growth, expanded commercial real estate and C&I lending, relationship deposits, private banking and wealth management. Management expected 2014 operating expenses to exceed prior-period levels and stated that revenue and profitability from the plan could lag expenses by several quarters. No quantified earnings or revenue guidance was provided.
  • Management said liquidity and capital were adequate. The company reported it believed it would meet Basel III capital requirements on a fully phased-in basis, though the rules were scheduled to take effect beginning in 2015.
  • Interest-rate simulations estimated that an immediate, sustained 200-basis-point increase would reduce 2014 net interest income by about 6% versus a flat-rate scenario, while a 100-basis-point decrease would reduce it by about 4% in 2014 and 7% in 2015. These are model estimates, not forecasts.
  • Principal risks include rapid loan growth and portfolio seasoning; concentration in New Jersey and New York real estate; commercial real estate credit exposure; interest-rate and funding risk; execution costs and returns of the growth strategy; regulatory and compliance costs; cybersecurity and operational disruption; and possible increases in credit losses, FDIC assessments or liquidity needs.
  • Troubled debt restructurings increased to $14.0 million from $9.3 million; $2.9 million was included in nonaccrual loans. Management reported no material pending or threatened litigation and no commitments to lend additional funds to nonperforming borrowers.
  • The independent auditor gave an unqualified opinion on the financial statements and reported effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether substantial loan growth—especially multifamily and commercial real estate—can be sustained without weakening underwriting quality or increasing future provisions.
  • How the $1.0 million allowance-methodology impact, lower allowance-to-loan ratio, and rising troubled restructurings relate to future credit costs and portfolio seasoning.
  • Whether core deposit growth and available borrowing capacity can adequately fund loan growth while maintaining liquidity and a prudent loan-to-deposit profile.
  • Whether strategic-plan revenue gains eventually offset higher staffing and operating costs, as management anticipates expenses will rise in 2014 and profitability may lag.
  • The effect of margin compression, rate movements and the large decline in cash balances on earnings and liquidity; validate model assumptions against subsequent results.
  • The impact of the rights offering on per-share earnings, ownership dilution and returns on newly raised capital; also confirm the subsequent transfer of $40.5 million to the Bank noted in the filing.