PRA GROUP INC quarterly report, Q1 FY2014

PRA Group, Inc. — Q1 2014 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Three months ended March 31, 2014; comparisons are with Q1 2013 unless stated. PRA Group purchases and collects defaulted consumer receivables and also provides receivables servicing and claims-settlement services. Amounts below are in U.S. dollars.

Financial performance and position

  • Revenue: $193.9 million, up 14.3%. Finance-receivable income was $178.0 million, up 15.0%; fee income was $16.0 million, up 8.0%.
  • Profit: Operating income was $71.6 million, up 8.7%; net income attributable to PRA was $40.8 million, up about 6%. Diluted EPS was $0.81 versus $0.75.
  • Margins and costs: Operating margin was approximately 37.0%, down from 38.9%; net margin was 21.1%, down from 22.7%. Operating expenses increased 17.9% to $122.3 million, faster than revenue, particularly due to higher legal collection costs, compensation, and acquisition-related outside fees. Interest expense rose to $4.9 million from $2.7 million.
  • Collections and portfolio assets: Cash collections rose 13.8% to $313.4 million. Net finance receivables were $1.254 billion at quarter-end, up from $1.239 billion at December 31, 2013. Estimated remaining collections were reported as approximately $2.705 billion. PRA recorded $2.0 million of net allowance reversals, versus $2.2 million of net allowance charges in Q1 2013.
  • Cash flow: Operating activities provided $49.3 million, down from $58.1 million. Investing activities used $21.1 million, versus $94.2 million, reflecting lower portfolio purchases. Financing activities provided $1.6 million. Cash increased to $191.8 million from $162.0 million at year-end.
  • Debt and liquidity: Borrowings had a $450.3 million net carrying amount at March 31, including a $192.5 million term loan and $287.5 million principal of 3.00% convertible notes, net of discount. PRA had no revolver borrowings and $435.5 million of unused availability at quarter-end. On April 1, it expanded revolving availability by $214.5 million, bringing the stated total credit facility to $842.5 million, subject to borrowing-base limits and covenants. PRA reported covenant compliance.
  • Balance sheet: Total assets were $1.643 billion, total liabilities $732.4 million, and stockholders’ equity $910.2 million at March 31, 2014.

Material changes and management commentary

  • Revenue growth was driven primarily by higher collections, which management attributed in part to improved scoring analytics and collection operations, including expansion of internal legal collections. Employee headcount rose 11.4% to 3,621.
  • Portfolio purchases cost $152.7 million in Q1 2014 versus $214.9 million in Q1 2013, while purchased face value increased to $1.91 billion from $1.85 billion. The mix shifted: core purchases were lower, while bankruptcy and other portfolio face value increased.
  • Management said legal-channel expansion increases near-term collection costs but is intended to support future collections and revenue. Collection estimates are model-based and can change with portfolio performance, regulations, economic conditions, and operational productivity.
  • There is no specific earnings or revenue guidance in the filing. Management expected ordinary operations, planned capital expenditures, forward-flow commitments, and normal portfolio purchases over the next 12 months to be funded by operating cash flow, cash on hand, and available borrowing capacity.

Acquisition, risks, and contingencies

  • Aktiv Kapital: PRA agreed to acquire Aktiv’s equity for approximately $880 million and assume about $435 million of debt, for estimated enterprise value of $1.3 billion. Closing was expected in Q2 or Q3 2014, subject to approvals, other customary conditions, and financing. Planned financing included cash, $170 million of seller financing, and up to $650 million from the domestic revolver. PRA projected borrowings of approximately $1.8 billion after closing. Estimated transaction costs were about $15 million, of which $4.4 million was incurred in Q1.
  • The acquisition carries execution, integration, financing, international operations, foreign-exchange, regulatory, and potential goodwill-impairment risks. The filing does not assure that the transaction will close on schedule or at all.
  • Tax dispute: The IRS disputes PRA’s cost-recovery tax treatment and the deduction timing of unused credit-facility fees for tax years 2005–2007; the matter was before the U.S. Tax Court. PRA reported $219.1 million of deferred taxes related to this item and warned that an adverse outcome could require payment and additional financing. Management believed its positions were supportable; no uncertain-tax-position reserve was recorded.
  • Litigation: PRA disclosed putative class actions alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, consolidated in federal court, with a motion to stay pending. Management said pending matters were not expected to have a material adverse effect based on current knowledge, but acknowledged outcomes could be material. The estimated high end of potential litigation losses above accrued amounts was less than $1 million, excluding specified matters and other putative class actions management considered immaterial.
  • Other risks include changes in collection laws and regulation, portfolio underperformance and valuation allowances, competition for receivables, staffing and productivity, interest-rate exposure, and the ability to maintain financing. The company had no interest-rate or currency hedges in place during the quarter.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether the Aktiv acquisition closed, its final financing and assumed debt, integration costs, and actual post-close leverage.
  • Whether collections and portfolio performance support estimated remaining collections and accretable yield, and whether future allowance charges are needed.
  • The status and potential financial exposure of the IRS Tax Court dispute and TCPA litigation.
  • Revolver availability after borrowing-base restrictions, covenant headroom, and sensitivity to higher interest rates.
  • Whether operating-cost growth—especially legal collection costs and staffing—translates into durable collection gains and margin recovery.