RIVERVIEW BANCORP INC quarterly report, Q2 FY2013

Riverview Bancorp, Inc. — Form 10-Q Summary

Reporting period: Quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012. This is fiscal 2013 second quarter, despite the request metadata stating 2012 Q2. Figures are unaudited and in U.S. dollars; financial statement amounts below are in millions unless noted.

Business context and financial performance

Riverview Community Bank operates primarily in Washington and Oregon, gathering deposits and lending to businesses, real estate borrowers and consumers. The company is reducing its balance sheet and higher-risk construction and land-development exposure while emphasizing commercial lending, core deposits and asset-quality improvement.

MetricThree months ended September 30, 2012Six months ended September 30, 2012
Net interest income$7.8 million, down from $8.4 million$15.9 million, down from $17.3 million
Net interest margin4.31%, versus 4.35%4.26%, versus 4.50%
Provision for loan losses$0.5 million, versus $2.2 million$4.5 million, versus $3.75 million
Non-interest income$2.3 million, versus $1.8 million$4.8 million, versus $3.7 million
Non-interest expense$7.8 million, approximately unchanged$16.1 million, versus $16.0 million
Net income$1.787 million, versus $0.181 million$7,000, versus $0.895 million
Basic and diluted EPS$0.08, versus $0.01$0.00, versus $0.04

Quarterly earnings improved substantially year over year, mainly alongside a lower loan-loss provision. For the six-month period, higher provisions and lower net interest income left earnings near breakeven. The six-month non-interest income increase included a $704,000 gain from a planned bulk sale of residential mortgage loans.

Financial position, cash flow and liquidity

  • Assets: $809.6 million at September 30, down from $856.0 million at March 31, 2012. Net loans fell to $562.1 million from $664.9 million, including a $31.4 million mortgage-loan sale and ongoing repayments and portfolio reductions.
  • Deposits and cash: Deposits declined to $699.2 million from $744.5 million. Cash rose to $98.4 million from $46.4 million; management attributed the increase primarily to loan repayments and the mortgage sale. Core branch deposits were 95.7% of deposits, up from 92.5%.
  • Cash flow: Operating cash flow was $6.4 million for the six months. Investing activities provided $90.6 million, substantially reflecting net loan repayments and loan-sale proceeds; financing activities used $45.0 million, mainly due to deposit outflows. Cash increased by $52.0 million. The investing inflow reflects balance-sheet contraction, not simply recurring earnings.
  • Debt and liquidity: Junior subordinated debentures remained $22.7 million. The company reported no FHLB or Federal Reserve advances and no brokered deposits at period-end. Available borrowing capacity was reported as $81.0 million at the Federal Reserve and $171.4 million at the FHLB, subject to collateral and other conditions.
  • Capital: Shareholders’ equity was $75.6 million, essentially unchanged. The Bank reported a 13.41% total risk-based capital ratio and a 9.09% Tier 1 leverage ratio; the latter was only slightly above the regulator-agreed 9.00% minimum.

Asset quality, material changes and risks

  • Nonperforming assets declined to $52.5 million from $62.9 million at March 31, but REO increased to $24.5 million from $18.7 million. Nonperforming loans fell to $28.0 million from $44.2 million, partly because $12.7 million of loans transferred to REO.
  • The allowance for loan losses was $20.1 million, or 3.46% of loans, versus $19.9 million, or 2.91%, at March 31. Six-month net charge-offs were $4.3 million. Classified commercial real estate loans rose to $51.5 million from $35.1 million.
  • Land-development and speculative-construction loans fell to $31.4 million from $49.6 million. Credit risk remains significant: management cited persistent economic weakness, collateral-value uncertainty and the possibility of additional delinquencies, losses and provisions. Total TDRs were $25.5 million; one $450,000 restructured loan defaulted during the period.
  • Regulatory restrictions: The Bank remains subject to an OCC written agreement requiring, among other things, credit-risk controls, asset-quality actions and prior OCC non-objection for dividends. The company is also subject to a Federal Reserve MOU, including restrictions on dividends, capital actions and new debt. Management said it believed it was in compliance.
  • Debt interest and dividends: The company continued deferring interest on its $22.7 million junior subordinated debentures; deferred interest totaled $3.0 million. The deferral restricts common-stock dividends and may affect access to wholesale funding or debt financing.
  • Other notable exposures: A trust-preferred collateralized debt obligation had a $1.119 million fair value and $1.855 million unrealized loss; it is Level 3, with material unobservable valuation assumptions. No additional other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in the quarter. Goodwill was not impaired in the June interim test, although the reporting unit’s fair value was below carrying value at step one and depended on step-two valuation.
  • Management reported a $17.1 million deferred-tax-asset valuation allowance, leaving a net deferred tax asset of $616,000. It cautioned that future profitability and economic conditions could affect any allowance reversal.

Outlook and investor verification points

Management provided no specific earnings guidance. It expects to continue reducing problem assets and selected loan exposures, controlling expenses, building core customer deposits and pursuing measured commercial-lending growth. It also noted that regional unemployment and real-estate conditions remain uncertain and that credit deterioration may persist. Forward-looking plans are subject to economic, credit, interest-rate, regulatory, funding and collateral-valuation risks.

Most important facts to verify:

  1. Whether nonperforming assets and REO continue to decline, and whether the rise in classified commercial real estate loans leads to further losses or provisions.
  2. Whether the allowance remains adequate relative to charge-offs, impaired loans and collateral values.
  3. Whether capital stays above the OCC-agreed minimums, particularly the 9.00% Tier 1 leverage threshold, and whether regulators modify or release the written agreement and MOU.
  4. Whether deposit outflows stabilize and reported borrowing capacity remains available under collateral requirements.
  5. Whether the company resumes interest payments on its debentures and what that means for dividend restrictions and funding access.
  6. Whether quarterly profitability is sustainable without relying on lower provisions or one-time mortgage-sale gains; the six-month period produced only $7,000 of net income.