ECOLAB INC. quarterly report, Q1 FY2012

Ecolab Inc. — Q1 2012 Form 10-Q

Business context and period: Unaudited results for the three months ended March 31, 2012. Ecolab’s December 2011 merger with Nalco materially changed the business; reported comparisons with Q1 2011 are therefore not directly comparable. Where noted, management compares Q1 2012 with Q1 2011 pro forma results that assume Nalco was included.

Key financial results

MetricQ1 2012Comparison
Net sales$2,810.9 millionUp 85% from reported Q1 2011; up 9% from Q1 2011 pro forma sales of $2,585.6 million
Operating income$165.8 millionUp 9% from reported Q1 2011, but down 54% from Q1 2011 pro forma; adjusted operating income rose 20% versus adjusted pro forma
Net income attributable to Ecolab$49.7 millionDown 47% from reported Q1 2011; adjusted net income rose 40% versus the prior-year comparison
Diluted EPS$0.17Down 58% from reported Q1 2011; adjusted diluted EPS was $0.50, up 11% from $0.45
Gross margin42.6%49.3% reported in Q1 2011; adjusted margin was 45.3% versus 46.2% pro forma
Cash from operating activities$110.5 million$56.1 million in Q1 2011
Cash and cash equivalents$354.0 million$1,843.6 million at December 31, 2011
Total debtApproximately $6.3 billionApproximately $7.6 billion at December 31, 2011; debt-to-capitalization ratio fell to 52% from 57%

Reported diluted EPS and income included substantial merger-related and other special items. Q1 2012 special gains and charges totaled $131.1 million, including $102.5 million of Nalco merger-related charges, $18.2 million of debt-extinguishment costs, and restructuring charges. The $73.9 million Nalco inventory fair-value step-up and $2.1 million of restructuring charges reduced reported gross margin by 2.7 percentage points. Management’s adjusted figures are non-GAAP measures.

Net interest expense was $86.1 million, versus $13.5 million in Q1 2011, reflecting merger financing and debt repayment activity as well as the $18.2 million debt-extinguishment loss. The reported effective tax rate was 44.7%; the adjusted rate was 30.7%.

Material changes and operating performance

  • Q1 2012 sales grew 9% against Q1 2011 pro forma sales: volume contributed 6% and pricing 3%; foreign exchange reduced growth by about 1%.
  • Global Energy was a growth leader, with fixed-currency sales up 29% and operating income up 53% versus pro forma Q1 2011. Latin American sales in the International segment rose 18% (15% excluding acquisitions).
  • Global Paper fixed-currency sales increased 2%, but operating income declined 9% versus pro forma, as higher delivered product and other costs outweighed pricing and volume gains. Ecolab announced price increases in Global Water and Global Paper in April.
  • Adjusted operating income growth reflected volume, pricing, and efficiencies, partly offset by higher delivered product costs and business investment. Adjusted gross margin declined year over year on a pro forma basis, partly due to sales mix and higher input costs.

Cash, debt, and liquidity

  • Cash used in investing was $137.3 million, including $124.2 million of capital expenditures; cash used in financing was $1,469.8 million, principally reflecting $1.7 billion of long-term debt repayments after redeeming Nalco notes.
  • Short-term debt increased to $1,346.9 million from $1,023.0 million, including $1,209.7 million of commercial paper. Long-term debt was $4,911.0 million, down from $6,613.2 million.
  • Management reported compliance with debt covenants and said borrowing capacity was sufficient for foreseeable operating needs. At quarter-end, Ecolab had a $1.5 billion multi-year credit facility and a $2.0 billion 364-day facility; the latter was reduced to $1.0 billion in April. Commercial-paper borrowing was capped at $2.5 billion following that reduction.
  • Q1 operating cash flow comparison was affected by a $100 million voluntary pension contribution in Q1 2011. Ecolab made a further $150 million voluntary contribution to U.S. pension plans in April 2012.

Outlook, risks, and unusual items

  • Restructuring and synergies: The 2011 restructuring plan is expected to cost about $150 million pretax through 2013, with approximately $70 million expected in 2012; it targets about $120 million in annualized savings when fully realized. The merger restructuring plan is expected to cost about $180 million pretax through 2013, including about $50 million in 2012, and includes workforce and facility actions. Management expects merger restructuring savings and synergies of approximately $250 million annually at run rate by the end of 2014, including about $75 million in 2012. These are forward-looking estimates.
  • Management expected to fund reasonably foreseeable cash needs over the next twelve months through operating cash flow, cash reserves, and short- or long-term borrowing. No specific full-year revenue or EPS guidance is stated in the provided filing text.
  • Material contingencies include litigation inherited with Nalco relating to COREXIT dispersant use in the Deepwater Horizon response, wage-hour cases, and other ordinary-course claims. Ecolab said it believes the Nalco claims are without merit and intends to defend them, but cannot predict their outcome or potential future litigation. A settlement of Nalco merger-related shareholder litigation had preliminary court approval; a final hearing was scheduled for June 8, 2012.
  • Nalco purchase-price allocations remained preliminary and subject to change. Goodwill and the $1.2 billion indefinite-lived Nalco trade name were scheduled for impairment testing in the second quarter; the filing notes that underperformance or changes in carrying value could lead to impairment.
  • The interim financial statements received a limited review by PwC, not an audit. Management reported effective disclosure controls and no material change in internal control over financial reporting during the quarter.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Reconcile reported results with the non-GAAP adjusted and pro forma measures, including the treatment of the $131.1 million of special items and the prior-year pro forma divestiture gain.
  • Track whether announced pricing offsets continued higher delivered product costs and whether Global Paper operating performance improves.
  • Monitor realization and timing of the restructuring savings and merger synergies against expected costs, workforce reductions, and cash requirements.
  • Review liquidity and refinancing needs given the increase in short-term debt, commercial-paper usage, and post-quarter reduction of the 364-day credit facility.
  • Follow final Nalco purchase accounting, second-quarter impairment testing, pension funding, and developments in Deepwater Horizon and other litigation.