EVOLUTION PETROLEUM CORP quarterly report, Q1 FY2015

Business context and reporting period

Evolution Petroleum Corporation is an independent petroleum company focused on developing incremental reserves, including the Delhi Field in Louisiana and its GARP artificial-lift technology. This unaudited Form 10-Q covers the three months ended September 30, 2014, the company’s first quarter of fiscal 2015; comparisons below are with the three months ended September 30, 2013 unless noted.

Financial performance and position

  • Revenue: $4.00 million, down 13.6% from $4.63 million. Delhi revenue was $3.87 million; artificial-lift revenue was $116,000.
  • Profit: Net income attributable to the company was $1.13 million, down 23.3%. Net income available to common shareholders was $960,435, or $0.03 per basic and diluted share, versus $1.30 million, or $0.05 basic and $0.04 diluted, in the year-ago quarter.
  • Costs and margins: Operating costs were $2.16 million, versus $2.67 million. G&A fell 22% to $1.50 million, primarily reflecting lower personnel costs after restructuring. DD&A increased 19% to $369,350, including a $76,515 charge for unrecovered artificial-lift installation costs. The effective tax rate rose to 38.5% from 24.7%.
  • Cash flow: Operating activities provided $631,412, down from $1.56 million, mainly reflecting working-capital outflows including incentive-compensation payments. Investing used $212,980. Financing used $2.99 million, principally for $3.28 million of common dividends and $168,575 of preferred dividends.
  • Liquidity and debt: Cash was $21.37 million at September 30, versus $23.94 million at June 30. Working capital was $21.9 million, down from $23.3 million. The company had no borrowings or letters of credit; its available borrowing base was $5 million, and it reported compliance with credit-facility covenants. Total liabilities were $11.79 million.
  • Other: Total assets were $62.08 million and stockholders’ equity was $50.28 million. Preferred stock carries an 8.5% annual dividend rate.

Material changes and operating developments

  • Delhi production averaged 425 net barrels per day (5,739 gross), down 3% year over year. The realized Delhi oil price fell 10% to $98.96 per barrel, contributing to a 13% decline in Delhi revenue.
  • Artificial-lift revenue declined 18.5%; production costs increased 20.5% to $197,360, including about $149,000 of workover costs. Workovers temporarily curtailed production at two company-operated wells.
  • G&A declined by $424,358 year over year. Stock-based compensation was $243,337 versus $373,438.
  • After quarter-end, the company sold its remaining Mississippian Lime interests for approximately $400,000, net of customary adjustments, with the buyer assuming abandonment liabilities.
  • The Delhi operator preliminarily determined that payout occurred in October 2014. Effective November 1, the company expected to receive a 23.9% working interest and 19.1% related revenue interest; combined with existing interests, its net revenue interest was expected to rise to 26.5%. The company will also bear its share of operating costs and capital spending.

Outlook, risks, contingencies and unusual items

  • Management expected to fund its fiscal 2015 capital program from working capital and operating cash flow. Delhi spending was estimated at $25–27 million net over the next two fiscal years, including $15–17 million for a gas-processing plant and about $10 million for the next CO2-flood phase. Management forecast approximately $45 million of spending over four years and expected Delhi cash flow to exceed net capital expenditures.
  • The company was discussing replacing its $5 million unsecured line with a secured facility of up to $30 million. Management said excess Delhi cash flow could allow the board to consider prudent dividend increases in fiscal 2016; this was not a firm commitment.
  • Management cited recent significant oil-price declines and warned that sustained lower prices could reduce revenue and cash flow and potentially require a full-cost-accounting property write-down. The company reported no commodity hedges.
  • Delhi’s future reversion is expected to increase both revenue and operating costs, reducing the unusually high margins previously associated with royalty interests. Plans include expanding the CO2 flood and constructing a gas-processing plant.
  • Legal matters include a royalty-rights dispute in which an appellate court reversed a prior dismissal in October 2014; the company sought rehearing. Other disclosed matters include litigation with Denbury over Delhi agreements and a separate environmental claim. The filing provides no clear quantified loss estimate for these matters.
  • The company reported no material changes to previously disclosed risk factors and no off-balance-sheet arrangements. Management concluded disclosure controls were effective and reported no material change in internal control over financial reporting.

Important facts for investors to verify

  1. Whether Delhi payout and the November 1 working-interest reversion were finalized as expected, and the resulting production, revenue, and operating-cost impact.
  2. Whether the proposed Delhi projects and $25–27 million two-year capital program proceed on schedule and remain funded by operating cash flow.
  3. Whether the proposed expanded credit facility is completed, and its capacity, terms, and covenant implications.
  4. Whether lower oil prices persist and affect cash generation, reserves, or the need for a property impairment.
  5. Developments in the disclosed Delhi-related lawsuits and any material change in potential exposure.
  6. Whether GARP installations generate durable net-profit revenue after workover costs and customer gas-processing economics.