PARK NATIONAL CORP quarterly report, Q3 FY2016

Park National Corporation — Q3 2016 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016. Unaudited consolidated results; balance-sheet comparisons are to December 31, 2015 unless otherwise noted. Amounts below are in millions except per-share data and ratios.

Business context and financial performance

Park is an Ohio-based financial holding company. Its principal operating subsidiary is The Park National Bank; other reported segments include Guardian Financial Services Company and SE Property Holdings, a run-off portfolio of legacy Vision assets.

MetricQ3 2016Q3 2015Nine months 2016Nine months 2015
Net interest income$58.5$57.7$175.8$169.8
Provision for (recovery of) loan losses$(7.4)$2.4$(3.8)$5.6
Other income$20.5$20.2$56.7$58.3
Other expense$46.8$47.4$142.0$137.8
Net income$27.4$20.0$66.1$60.1
Diluted EPS$1.78$1.30$4.29$3.90

Tax-equivalent net interest margin was 3.42% in Q3 2016 versus 3.37% a year earlier, and 3.47% for the first nine months versus 3.39%. Nine-month average loans grew 4.5% year over year; management attributed the increase in net interest income principally to loan growth. Dividends declared were $0.94 per share for Q3 and $2.82 year to date, unchanged from the comparable 2015 periods.

Financial position, cash flow and credit

  • Total assets were $7,364.1, including loans of $5,187.0 and investment securities of $1,478.3. Loans rose 2.3% from year-end; securities declined 10.1%.
  • Deposits increased 3.2% to $5,519.7. Cash and cash equivalents increased to $240.0 from $149.5. Short-term borrowings fell to $218.2 from $394.2; long-term debt was $742.7 and subordinated notes were $45.0.
  • For the first nine months, operating cash flow was $57.8 and investing cash flow was $80.0; financing activities used $47.2. Net income was $66.1. Cash dividends paid were $43.2.
  • Shareholders’ equity was $751.1, or 10.2% of assets, compared with $713.4, or 9.8%, at year-end. Park’s total risk-based capital ratio was 14.56%; PNB’s was 11.53%, above its 10.00% well-capitalized guideline.
  • The allowance for loan losses was $53.6, or 1.03% of loans, down from $56.5. Nonperforming assets were $131.8, down from $141.4 at year-end; nonperforming loans were $116.9. Nonaccrual loans were $97.8, versus $95.9 at year-end, so the overall decline in nonperforming assets did not reflect a decline in nonaccrual loans.

Material changes, outlook and risks

  • Net income increased year over year, helped by lower credit-loss expense (a recovery rather than a provision) and higher net interest income. Nine-month other income fell 2.7%, while other expense rose 3.0%; professional fees, furniture and equipment, and salaries were among the expense increases.
  • Management revised allowance assumptions in Q3, including its historical loss lookback, weighting and loss-emergence-period methods. It said these changes reduced the allowance by $3.8 compared with retaining the June 30 calculation and assumptions. Management’s allowance estimate remains judgmental and may change with credit conditions and actual losses.
  • After quarter-end, on October 20, Park prepaid $50.0 of FHLB advances bearing 3.15% interest. The $5.6 prepayment penalty is expected to be recorded in Q4 2016; the advances had an expected annual expense of $1.575 in 2017. The payment used excess cash.
  • No quantified earnings or revenue guidance is provided. Management stated that it considered available funding sources more than adequate for liquidity needs. Its interest-rate simulation projected net income declines over the next year of 0.2% in a rising-rate scenario and 8.9% in a declining-rate scenario.
  • Risks cited include changes in economic and real-estate conditions, credit quality, interest rates, funding and liquidity, competition, regulation, litigation, cybersecurity and operational disruptions. Park had accrued approximately $2.3 for legal contingencies. The filing also says adoption of the expected-credit-loss standard (CECL) is anticipated to materially affect the allowance; the impact was still under evaluation.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether the $3.8 allowance reduction from methodology changes is supported by subsequent credit performance, and how expected-credit-loss implementation may affect reserves.
  • Trends in nonaccrual loans, troubled debt restructurings, loan charge-offs and recoveries, including the concentration and performance of impaired and legacy Vision loans.
  • The Q4 accounting and cash impact of the $5.6 FHLB prepayment penalty and the longer-term benefit of retiring the advances.
  • Developments in legal proceedings and whether the $2.3 accrued contingency remains adequate.
  • Deposit growth, funding costs, liquidity and interest-rate sensitivity; confirm capital ratios against applicable regulatory requirements.

The filing states that interim results are not necessarily indicative of full-year results.