SUBURBAN PROPANE PARTNERS LP current report, Q2 FY2012

Business Context and Reporting Period

This Form 8-K filing by Suburban Propane Partners, L.P. reports on the results of its regular Tri-Annual Meeting of Unitholders held on May 14, 2012. The meeting was adjourned from its original date of May 1, 2012, due to a lack of quorum.

Key Financial Metrics

The filing text does not provide a clear value for revenue, profit, cash flow, margins, debt, or liquidity. This report focuses exclusively on corporate governance and voting results.

Material Changes and Voting Results

Board of Supervisors Election

Unitholders re-elected all six nominees to the Board of Supervisors for a three-year term. The voting results were as follows:

  • Harold R. Logan, Jr.: 17,266,198 For; 523,824 Withheld
  • John Hoyt Stookey: 17,143,449 For; 646,573 Withheld
  • Dudley C. Mecum: 17,137,772 For; 652,250 Withheld
  • John D. Collins: 16,236,035 For; 1,553,987 Withheld
  • Jane Swift: 17,232,589 For; 557,433 Withheld
  • Michael J. Dunn, Jr.: 15,886,084 For; 1,903,938 Withheld

Advisory Resolution on Executive Compensation ("Say-on-Pay")

The proposal was approved by Unitholders.

  • For: 16,122,718
  • Against: 1,092,850
  • Abstain: 574,454

Adjournment Proposal

The proposal to adjourn the meeting if necessary to solicit additional proxies was approved.

  • For: 13,953,108
  • Against: 3,443,334
  • Abstain: 393,580

Partnership Agreement Amendments (Failed)

Two proposals to amend the limited partnership agreements failed to receive the necessary approval of a majority of outstanding common units, despite receiving over 80% approval of the units actually voted. Consequently, neither amendment will be adopted:

  • Financing Transactions Amendment: 13,903,101 For; 3,439,370 Against; 447,551 Abstain.
  • Exclusive Forum (Delaware Courts) Amendment: 14,104,383 For; 3,271,215 Against; 414,424 Abstain.

Guidance, Outlook, and Management Commentary

The filing notes that because the Partnership holds Tri-Annual Meetings, no proposal regarding the frequency of Say-on-Pay resolutions was presented. The Partnership will include a Say-on-Pay proposal at each Tri-Annual Meeting as required by applicable law.

Important Facts for Investor Verification

  • Verify the total number of outstanding common units to understand the impact of the low turnout on the failed partnership amendments.
  • Confirm the specific terms of the failed amendments regarding third-party financing and exclusive forum selection to assess future governance flexibility.
  • Review the press release (Exhibit 99.1) referenced in the filing for any additional context on the voting results.