Trilogy Metals Inc. annual report, FY2019

Trilogy Metals Inc. — FY2019 Form 10-K

Reporting period: Fiscal year ended November 30, 2019; includes fourth-quarter results. Amounts are U.S. dollars unless stated otherwise. Filed February 13, 2020.

Business context

Trilogy is an exploration and development company focused on the Upper Kobuk Mineral Projects in Northwest Alaska: the Arctic polymetallic project and the Bornite copper project. Neither project was producing or under development at year-end. The company had no mining revenue.

Financial and operating highlights

MetricFY2019FY2018
Revenue from mining operationsNoneNone
Net loss$27.9 million$21.8 million
Basic and diluted loss per share$0.21$0.18
Cash and cash equivalents at year-end$19.2 million$23.0 million
Working capital$17.8 million$22.0 million
Total assets$51.6 million$54.7 million
Total liabilities$33.4 million$22.5 million

Operating cash outflow was $23.5 million; financing provided $10.1 million, mainly from warrant and option exercises, and investing provided $9.6 million, including $10.2 million of South32 project funding. Cash declined $3.8 million during the year. Trilogy reported no material off-balance-sheet arrangements and no conventional borrowing debt was identified in the supplied filing text. Long-term liabilities include a $31.0 million South32 purchase-option/deferred-consideration balance, not described as debt.

Mineral-property expense increased to $19.2 million from $16.5 million. Total expenses were $28.4 million, up from $21.9 million. Stock-based compensation rose to $3.8 million from $1.4 million; professional fees increased to $1.4 million from $0.5 million. Management attributed the higher loss chiefly to larger field programs and higher stock compensation and professional fees.

Fourth-quarter loss was $6.5 million, compared with $5.3 million in Q4 2018. Q4 2019 mineral-property expense was $3.8 million, broadly in line with the prior-year quarter.

Projects, material changes, and outlook

  • South32 joint venture: After year-end, South32 exercised its option; formation of Ambler Metals LLC completed February 11, 2020. Trilogy contributed its Alaska project assets and South32 contributed $145 million. Each owns 50%. Trilogy expected the JV funds to advance the projects through feasibility and permitting and said it did not expect to fund UKMP programs until those funds were spent.
  • Arctic: Trilogy spent $8.6 million in FY2019, above its $7.0 million budget, primarily due to additional engineering and project-support costs. It expected to release a feasibility study in the first half of 2020. The 2018 PFS estimated initial capital of $779.6 million, post-tax NPV of $1.41 billion at an 8% discount rate, post-tax IRR of 33.4%, and a 12-year mine life; these are study estimates, not actual results, and exclude the later South32 JV and NANA’s potential project-level rights.
  • Bornite and regional exploration: South32 funded the $9.2 million Bornite program; Trilogy reported 7,610 meters drilled. Trilogy and South32 agreed to equally fund a $2.0 million regional program. Trilogy also staked additional claims, increasing its state-claim area by 66%.
  • Access and permitting: The Draft EIS comment period for the proposed Ambler Mining District Industrial Access Project closed in October 2019. BLM was preparing the final EIS, but timing was uncertain. The proposed road and multiple project permits remain essential to development.
  • Liquidity outlook: Management said existing corporate cash resources were expected to cover current corporate expenditures for three or more years, while noting that this outlook depends on assumptions and that the JV funds are intended for UKMP activities. Management anticipated approximately $400,000 of additional professional fees due to JV completion and the CEO search.

Risks, contingencies, and unusual items

Key risks include the absence of operating revenue, continuing losses and exploration-stage uncertainty; dependence on future financing and South32 as a 50% JV partner; commodity-price and cost sensitivity; remote-site infrastructure, weather and seasonal constraints; and the risk that the access road, environmental review, permits or mine approvals are delayed or not obtained. The Arctic PFS economics are sensitive particularly to copper and zinc prices, costs, and the road toll. The filing also describes NANA rights that may include a 16%–25% project interest or a 15% net-proceeds royalty, plus land-based royalties. Trilogy stated it believed it was a passive foreign investment company for 2018 and 2019, potentially affecting U.S. holders’ taxes. No material pending or threatened litigation was reported. The independent auditor issued unqualified opinions on the financial statements and internal control; management also concluded controls were effective.

Mineral-resource and reserve disclosures use Canadian NI 43-101 standards and may not be comparable to U.S. standards. The company stated it had no known reserves under SEC Industry Guide 7; resource estimates, especially inferred resources, are uncertain and do not establish economic viability.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Progress, cost estimates, economics, and timing of the Arctic feasibility study, and how its results compare with the 2018 PFS.
  • Ambler Metals’ use of the $145 million contribution, the remaining funding runway, and future funding obligations under the 50/50 JV.
  • Final EIS and permitting milestones for the access road and projects, including whether the road is approved, funded, and built.
  • Updated project ownership economics after accounting for NANA’s potential back-in, royalty, and lease rights.
  • Cash burn, the $31.0 million option/deferred-consideration accounting, and Trilogy’s corporate liquidity outlook.