Hut 8 Corp. quarterly report, Q1 FY2024

Business context and reporting period

Hut 8 Corp. filed this Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2023. The financial statements and MD&A principally cover USBTC, the accounting acquirer, for its fiscal first quarter of 2024—not Hut 8’s standalone results or combined-company results. Hut 8 and USBTC completed their merger of equals on November 30, 2023, after quarter-end; the filing’s quarterly financials therefore do not reflect the combined company.

USBTC operated Bitcoin mining, hosting, managed infrastructure and equipment-sales businesses. At quarter-end, it reported approximately 182,000 miners across four locations with access to about 730 MW of electricity, including approximately 30,200 self-mining machines (3.1 EH/s) and 8,500 hosted machines.

Financial results and liquidity

Amounts below are USD millions unless stated otherwise. Comparative period is the three months ended September 30, 2022.

MetricQ ended Sep. 30, 2023Prior-year quarterChange / context
Total revenue$21.7$33.5Down 35%; mainly reflects lower hosting and no equipment-sales revenue, partly offset by new management-fee and cost-reimbursement revenue.
Bitcoin mining revenue$15.6$16.3Down about 5%; Bitcoin mined fell to 553 from 766.
Operating income (loss)$(0.7)$3.8Turned to an operating loss.
Net loss$(4.4)$(0.6)Loss increased; interest expense rose and prior-year hosting revenue included a $13.1 million deferred-revenue recognition after a customer default.
Adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP)$11.4$12.4Lower year over year; not a substitute for GAAP results.
Operating cash flow$2.2$(7.4)Improved; includes working-capital movements and $11.4 million of distributions of joint-venture earnings.
Cash$12.7$10.4 at June 30, 2023Quarter-end cash increased by $2.4 million.
Notes payable$141.8 carrying amount$151.2 at June 30, 2023USBTC repaid approximately $15.1 million of notes during the quarter; stated rates on listed notes range from 14% to 18%, with the TZRC note at 15.25%.
Working capital$11.2Not stated hereCurrent assets of $22.4 million versus current liabilities of $11.3 million.
Stockholders’ equity$23.3$27.4 at June 30, 2023Accumulated deficit was $110.9 million.

Gross margin is not clearly provided as a reported metric. Service costs of revenue were $11.8 million; depreciation and amortization was $4.5 million. Interest expense was $5.7 million, including noncash paid-in-kind interest. USBTC said cash on hand, cryptocurrency-sale proceeds and ongoing operations were expected to cover operating and capital requirements for at least 12 months from issuance of the statements.

Material changes, outlook and risks

  • Business mix: Management-fee revenue was $3.4 million and cost-reimbursement revenue was $2.3 million, both new versus the prior-year quarter. Hosting revenue fell to $0.4 million from $13.6 million; the prior-year amount included $13.1 million recognized after a customer default. Equipment-sales revenue was nil versus $3.6 million.
  • Mining economics: Reported cost to mine one Bitcoin was approximately $19,000, versus $18,700 a year earlier, with increased network difficulty cited as a cause. Bitcoin mined declined despite self-mining fleet growth. The filing identifies Bitcoin price, network difficulty, the expected 2024 block-reward halving, electricity costs, access to power and access to capital as significant sensitivities.
  • Joint venture and debt: USBTC’s 50% King Mountain JV investment had a carrying value of $84.3 million; the company recorded $2.1 million of equity-method earnings. The associated secured note has a high interest rate and paid-in-kind interest; principal and accrued interest are due at maturity or earlier under specified events.
  • Post-quarter commitments and opportunities: In October, USBTC ordered approximately $40 million of AI equipment and was evaluating financing; it reported no AI customers or AI revenue as of the filing. A revised Celsius-related operating-services bid, with proposed fees of $20.4 million annually net of certain costs over four years, remained subject to bankruptcy-court approval. A December 18 interim agreement concerned development of mining operations at Cedarvale, Texas. The company said its share of the original $10 million Fahrenheit-bid deposit remained in escrow and was expected to be returned.
  • Controls and reporting: Management concluded disclosure controls were ineffective at September 30 because of material weaknesses involving revenue transactions, income taxes, equity-method investments and complex transactions. Remediation was expected by December 31, 2023. The prior-year comparative cash-flow statement was restated to classify $15.7 million of cryptocurrency-sale proceeds as investing, rather than operating cash flow; net change in cash was unchanged.
  • Legal and other risks: Lancium filed a patent-infringement lawsuit seeking unspecified damages; USBTC disputed the claims. A Niagara Falls city lawsuit was rescinded following a ratified settlement, with related costs recorded. Management stated it did not believe ordinary-course claims would result in a reasonably possible material loss, but outcomes remain uncertain.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  1. Confirm the accounting scope and post-merger presentation: these results are USBTC pre-combination, not consolidated post-merger Hut 8 results.
  2. Review debt terms, PIK interest accumulation, repayment requirements and collateral—particularly the King Mountain and Anchorage obligations—and assess refinancing needs.
  3. Reconcile operating cash generation with Bitcoin sales, joint-venture distributions and working-capital movements; note the prior-period cash-flow restatement.
  4. Assess the assumptions behind mining profitability, power costs, network difficulty and the halving, and whether fleet utilization supports reported economics.
  5. Track financing and cancellation terms for the approximately $40 million AI equipment order, and court approval, contract terms and escrow recovery relating to Celsius.
  6. Check subsequent filings for remediation of the disclosed material weaknesses and developments in the Lancium litigation and other contingencies.