Clearsign Technologies Corp annual report, FY2015

ClearSign Combustion Corporation — 2015 Form 10-K

Business context and reporting period. The filing is for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015; it is an annual report, not a standalone quarterly filing. The filing company name is ClearSign Combustion Corporation, although the request metadata identifies ClearSign Technologies Corp. ClearSign develops combustion technologies: Duplex, intended to reduce emissions and improve efficiency, and Electrodynamic Combustion Control (ECC), which uses an electric field to influence combustion. Neither technology was commercialized, and the company says its technology had not been independently verified. The company reported only de minimis revenue since inception in 2008.

Key financial metrics

Metric20152014
Revenue$61,000$0
Gross profit$11,000$0
Operating expenses$7.953 million$7.301 million
Operating loss$7.942 million$7.301 million
Net loss$7.898 million$7.296 million
Net loss per share$0.63$0.77
Cash used in operating activities$6.261 million$5.469 million
Cash and cash equivalents at year-end$10.985 million$1.845 million
Working capital at year-end$9.564 million$719,000
Total liabilities at year-end$1.624 million$1.640 million

The $61,000 of 2015 revenue came from engineering services for a prospective refinery customer. Gross margin was approximately 18% ($11,000 gross profit on $61,000 revenue), but the revenue base was immaterial. The balance sheet reports no debt; liabilities were primarily accrued compensation, accounts payable and deferred rent. The company reported total assets of $14.202 million and stockholders’ equity of $12.578 million at year-end. No dividends were paid or expected in the foreseeable future.

Material changes versus 2014

  • Net loss increased by $602,000, while operating expenses rose $652,000, or approximately 9%. R&D expense increased $715,000 to $2.932 million, largely reflecting higher field-testing and laboratory costs and additional personnel.
  • G&A expense declined $63,000 to $5.021 million. The 2014 comparison included a $943,000 charge related to the former CEO’s employment termination; 2015 included stock-option and relocation costs associated with the new CEO.
  • The company recorded a $593,000 impairment loss in 2015 from abandoning certain capitalized pending patents and trademarks, versus $262,000 in 2014. The filing’s quarterly note identifies a $588,000 fourth-quarter adjustment related to this impairment.
  • Cash increased primarily because of a February 2015 underwritten stock offering: 2.99 million shares sold for $17.5 million gross and approximately $16.3 million net. Financing cash inflow was $16.563 million for 2015.
  • Operating cash use rose by $792,000 year over year. Investing cash use was $1.162 million, including $1.113 million for patents and other intangible assets.
  • Weighted-average shares outstanding increased to 12.462 million from 9.507 million, contributing to lower loss per share despite the higher net loss.

Outlook, commentary and risks

  • Management said year-end cash was expected to fund operations for at least the next 18 months. The company nevertheless anticipated continued operating losses and negative cash flow, and said additional financing would likely be needed to develop and commercialize its technologies.
  • A shelf registration statement effective January 7, 2016 allows offerings of up to $30 million in securities. The company had no committed financing source and may seek equity or debt financing, co-development funding, or asset sales or licensing; future financing could dilute shareholders or impose restrictive terms.
  • Duplex field trials included OTSG and refinery process-heater applications. The company reported testing at up to 52 million BTU/hr and results meeting a stated local NOx limit of 5 ppm, but emphasized that further fieldwork and customer acceptance were needed. Six of seven described field-test agreements provided for payment only after completion and customer satisfaction.
  • Management cited approximately 1% thermal-efficiency improvement versus a conventional low-NOx burner without flue gas recirculation, and estimated potential energy savings of 3–4% versus systems using recirculation. These are company observations or estimates, not independently verified outcomes.
  • The South Coast Air Quality Management District designated Duplex a Best Available Retrofit Control Technology for refinery process heaters and boilers in December 2015. This is not evidence of broad commercial adoption or federal approval.
  • Risks include unproven technology and uncertain market acceptance; limited cash relative to development needs; reliance on future financing; technical, permitting and safety hurdles; competition from larger established suppliers; potential intellectual-property challenges; and exposure to changing environmental rules and energy-market conditions.
  • The financial statements received an unqualified audit opinion. The auditor did not audit internal control over financial reporting; management reported its controls were effective as of December 31, 2015.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether the listed field projects were completed, accepted by customers, and converted into paid commercial orders, and the timing and amount of any resulting revenue.
  • Whether the claimed emissions and efficiency performance is reproducible in sustained operation and independently validated.
  • Actual cash burn and financing needs relative to management’s stated 18-month runway, including any subsequent securities issuance under the shelf registration.
  • The status and scope of the approximately 155 pending patent applications, the six ECC patents granted, and the impact of the 2015 patent impairment.
  • Whether customer adoption, required permits, and commercial margins develop as management anticipates; the filing says margins could not yet be predicted.
  • The dilution implications of outstanding options and warrants and the company’s continuing need to fund operations through capital raising.