COLLEGIUM PHARMACEUTICAL, INC quarterly report, Q3 FY2017

Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. — Q3 2017 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2017. The unaudited financial statements are for a commercial-stage specialty pharmaceutical company whose lead product, Xtampza ER, launched in June 2016. Amounts below are in U.S. dollars; financial statement amounts are in millions unless stated otherwise.

Financial performance and liquidity

MetricQ3 2017Q3 2016Nine months 2017Nine months 2016
Net product revenue$11.950$0.408$17.682$0.408
Cost of product revenue$0.553$0.029$1.501$0.029
Gross profit / margin$11.397 / 95.4%$0.379 / 92.9%$16.181 / 91.5%$0.379 / 92.9%
Research and development$2.069$3.254$6.378$11.617
Selling, general and administrative$22.758$23.567$67.667$55.266
Operating loss$(13.430)$(26.442)$(57.864)$(66.504)
Net loss$(13.263)$(26.444)$(57.462)$(66.617)
Loss per share, basic and diluted$(0.45)$(1.13)$(1.95)$(2.85)

Gross profit and margin are calculated from reported product revenue less cost of product revenue; they are not separately presented as such by the company. Q3 2017 revenue included a one-time $4.377 million increase from changing to sell-in revenue recognition, including recognition of shipments from prior periods. The gross margin comparison is therefore affected by that change.

  • Cash and liquidity: Cash and cash equivalents were $107.611 million at September 30, down from $153.225 million at December 31, 2016. Current assets were $118.896 million and current liabilities $26.396 million, implying working capital of approximately $92.5 million.
  • Cash flow, nine months: Operating activities used $53.722 million, compared with $51.766 million in 2016; investing activities used $0.818 million, compared with $2.636 million; financing activities provided $8.926 million, compared with $49.733 million. Cash declined by $45.614 million during the period.
  • Debt: Term-loan payable was $2.146 million, all classified as current, at quarter-end; the company repaid $2.0 million during the nine-month period. No long-term term loan was reported at September 30.
  • Equity and shares: Shareholders’ equity was $96.269 million, versus $134.908 million at year-end 2016. The company reported 30.765 million shares outstanding at September 30 and 32,562,277 shares outstanding as of October 31.

Material changes versus the prior comparable period

  • Revenue rose sharply as Xtampza sales grew following its 2016 launch; Q3 reported revenue also benefited from the $4.377 million recognition change. The filing attributes the quarterly revenue increase primarily to higher sold-through units and the move to sell-in accounting.
  • For the first nine months, R&D expense fell $5.239 million, mainly due to completed clinical trials, lower Xtampza manufacturing costs recorded as R&D in the earlier period, and reduced consulting costs.
  • Nine-month SG&A expense increased $12.401 million, primarily from higher salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation as headcount increased from 201 to 235, and higher legal expense related to litigation. Lower post-marketing requirement costs partly offset the increase.
  • Nine-month net loss narrowed to $57.462 million from $66.617 million, while operating cash use increased modestly. Financing cash inflow was substantially lower than in 2016, when public offering proceeds were higher.

Outlook, commentary and risks

  • Management said existing cash, expected Xtampza cash inflows and ATM proceeds raised through October 2017 were expected to fund operating expenses, debt service and capital spending into mid-2019. This is a forward-looking estimate based on assumptions; the company cautioned that it could use cash sooner and may need additional financing.
  • In the nine months ended September 30, the company sold 1,148,466 shares under its at-the-market offering for net proceeds of $11.455 million. In October, it sold a further 1,793,290 shares for net proceeds of $19.646 million. These issuances dilute existing shareholders.
  • The company expected to continue significant losses and commercialization spending. It had an accumulated deficit of $280.646 million and stated it may never achieve profitability.
  • Xtampza faces market acceptance, competition, reimbursement and opioid-policy risks, as well as controlled-substance supply, manufacturing, post-marketing and regulatory requirements. Revenue estimation depends on judgments including returns, rebates and discounts.
  • Purdue Pharma continued patent litigation seeking monetary relief and injunctions against Xtampza sales. The company said it could not assess the likelihood or quantify any potential loss. A further Purdue suit filed in October 2017 in response to Collegium’s supplemental NDA could potentially affect FDA approval of the proposed label change; the filing said whether it would trigger a stay was unclear.
  • After quarter-end, in November 2017, the FDA approved Xtampza’s supplemental NDA. The updated label includes comparative pharmacokinetic data, results from an oral human abuse-potential study and an oral abuse-deterrent claim.
  • Collegium expected to launch licensed product Onsolis in mid-2018, subject to FDA approval of a manufacturing-transfer supplement. Potential milestones of up to $21 million and upper-teens royalties on U.S. net sales were disclosed; none had been triggered at quarter-end.
  • Management reported disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable-assurance level, and no material change in internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  1. How much of Xtampza revenue reflects ongoing customer demand versus the one-time sell-in accounting transition, and how estimates of returns and rebates develop.
  2. Whether the company’s projected cash runway into mid-2019 holds as commercial spending, revenue and working-capital needs evolve, and whether further equity financing is required.
  3. The status and potential consequences of Purdue’s patent cases, including any effect on Xtampza sales or the supplemental label approval.
  4. Xtampza’s prescription growth, reimbursement and market acceptance, and the company’s ability to meet manufacturing, controlled-substance and post-marketing requirements.
  5. Whether Onsolis receives the required FDA approval and launches on the expected timeline, including the associated costs and contingent payments.