UFP TECHNOLOGIES INC annual report, FY2011

UFP Technologies, Inc. — 2011 Form 10-K

Reporting period: Fiscal year ended December 31, 2011. The filing also reports unaudited fourth-quarter results. UFP designs and manufactures engineered foam, plastic, and molded-fiber packaging and components, serving medical, automotive, aerospace and defense, electronics, industrial, and consumer markets.

Key financial results

Metric20112010Change
Net sales$127.2 million$120.8 million+5.4%
Gross profit / margin$36.2 million / 28.5%$34.6 million / 28.7%Profit +4.7%; margin down 0.2 points
Operating income$15.7 million$14.4 million+9.2%
Net income attributable to UFP$10.3 million$9.2 million+11.9%
Diluted earnings per share$1.48$1.37+8.0%
Cash provided by operations$11.7 million$11.8 millionDown slightly

Revenue growth was led by aerospace and defense sales, up approximately $3.1 million, including a new U.S. Marines backpack-components contract, and automotive interior-trim sales, up approximately $1.8 million. Component Products sales were $84.7 million, versus $80.4 million; Packaging sales were $42.6 million, versus $40.4 million. Component Products operating income rose to $13.0 million from $11.1 million, while Packaging operating income fell to $2.7 million from $3.3 million.

Fourth-quarter 2011 sales were $31.5 million, compared with $31.6 million in fourth-quarter 2010. Gross profit was $9.0 million versus $9.2 million; net income attributable to UFP was $3.0 million versus $3.1 million. Diluted EPS was $0.43 versus $0.45.

Liquidity, debt, and capital

  • At year-end, cash and cash equivalents were $29.8 million, working capital was $48.6 million, total assets were $79.7 million, and stockholders’ equity was $62.0 million.
  • Total debt was approximately $6.2 million, down from $7.5 million; there were no borrowings on the $17 million revolving facility, with approximately $16.9 million available subject to collateral. The facility matures in November 2013; term loans mature in January 2016. The company was in compliance with its fixed-charge coverage covenant.
  • Capital expenditures were $3.7 million. Cash provided by operations less capital expenditures was approximately $8.0 million, calculated from reported figures. The company reported no dividends in 2011 or 2010.

Material changes, outlook, and risks

  • Operating income included an $839,000 gain primarily related to the sale of UDT’s Alabama facility. The property sold for approximately $1.25 million; the gain included a one-time $250,000 management fee. The Alabama facility closure also contributed approximately $350,000 of costs.
  • A large automotive door-panel program for a redesigned vehicle model ended on June 30, 2011. Management expected sales from that program to decline in 2012 and beyond, although UFP continued supplying other vehicle models.
  • Backlog as of February 11, 2012, was $8.8 million in Packaging, down from $9.6 million a year earlier, and $23.8 million in Component Products, up from $17.7 million. The filing cautions that orders may be canceled or rescheduled and backlog is not a reliable revenue forecast.
  • Management stated that operating cash flow was expected to fund operations over the next 12 months, subject to the disclosed risks. No specific revenue or earnings guidance was provided.
  • Key risks include customer concentration (top ten customers represented approximately 28% of 2011 revenue), the expected decline in the automotive program, raw-material and energy cost volatility, dependence on limited sources for certain foams, and the possibility of customer manufacturing moving offshore. Recticel represented 7.2% of total 2011 sales. Ordinary-course legal proceedings were not expected by management to have a material adverse effect.
  • Management reported effective disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting; the auditor issued unqualified opinions on the financial statements and internal controls.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • How quickly sales and earnings replace revenue from the discontinued automotive model program, and the timing and margins of the Marines contract.
  • Whether Packaging’s lower operating income persists, and how much reported operating-income growth depended on the Alabama property-sale gain.
  • Whether inventory built for the military program converts to shipments and cash, given the 2011 inventory increase of approximately $1.7 million.
  • Current customer concentration, raw-material pass-through effectiveness, and availability and pricing of limited-source foam supplies.
  • Subsequent results and obligations following UFP’s February 2012 purchase of the building it leased from UDT for $1.35 million and the planned dissolution of UDT.