DSS, INC. quarterly report, Q2 FY2016

DSS, Inc. — Q2 2016 Form 10-Q Summary

Business context and reporting period

DSS, Inc. operates packaging and printing, plastics, digital services, and intellectual-property monetization businesses. This unaudited report covers the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2016, compared with the same periods in 2015.

Financial performance and liquidity

MetricQ2 2016Q2 2015Six months 2016Six months 2015
Revenue$4.072 million$4.196 million$8.411 million$7.626 million
Gross profit$1.742 million$1.533 million$3.470 million$2.976 million
Gross margin42.8%36.5%41.3%39.0%
Operating loss$240,000$1.095 million$782,000$2.639 million
Net loss$318,000$1.043 million$942,000$2.690 million
Loss per share, basic and diluted$0.01$0.02$0.02$0.06
  • Six-month operating cash use improved to $67,000 from $928,000 in 2015. Investing activities provided $298,000, including $495,000 from a patent-asset sale; financing activities used $901,000, including debt principal payments. Cash declined by $669,000 to $771,000. Restricted cash was $218,000.
  • At June 30, current assets were $4.594 million and current liabilities were $9.027 million. Total debt carrying amounts were approximately $6.927 million, including $3.537 million classified as short-term. Stockholders’ equity was $2.798 million.
  • The company had an undrawn $800,000 revolving credit line available to its packaging subsidiary, maturing May 2017.

Material changes versus prior periods

  • Q2 revenue fell 3%; six-month revenue rose 10%. Six-month printed-products revenue increased 15%, while technology sales, services and licensing declined 23%. Management attributed the technology decline to lower digital hardware and software resales and a $150,000 licensing settlement fee recorded in 2015.
  • Net loss narrowed 70% in Q2 and 65% for the first half. Management cited lower professional fees and stock compensation, plus improved margins in packaging and plastics. Six-month professional fees fell 47% and stock-based compensation fell 87%.
  • Technology reported a six-month segment loss of approximately $1.053 million; packaging and printing and plastics reported segment income of approximately $532,000 and $253,000, respectively.

Outlook, risks, contingencies and unusual items

  • Management said current cash and credit resources should fund operations and obligations for at least 12 months only if key business-plan targets are achieved, including growth in digital sales, lower IP-related legal and professional costs, and continued operating profits in packaging and plastics. Otherwise, it estimated a need to raise approximately $500,000 to $1 million through June 2017; future financing is not assured.
  • DSS Technology Management failed to meet a February 13, 2016 payment requirement under its Fortress funding agreement. The resulting default made approximately $3.567 million of remaining note amounts short-term. The agreement limits investor recourse principally to specified patents and related proceeds, but discussions to amend or remedy the default had no assured outcome.
  • In June 2016, the PTAB ruled for Apple in two patent reviews; DSS planned to appeal. Other patent cases faced reviews, stays, adverse decisions, or settlements. Potential litigation costs or awards could materially affect results, cash flows, or financial condition.
  • Disclosure controls were deemed ineffective at June 30, 2016 because a previously reported material weakness remained. Management planned to continue monitoring controls and evaluating cost-effective remediation.
  • Subsequent event: shareholders approved a 1-for-4 reverse stock split, scheduled to take effect August 25, 2016.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether the Fortress default is amended or otherwise resolved, and how the patent collateral and proceeds are treated.
  • Whether operating cash generation improves and the company avoids the stated potential $500,000–$1 million financing need.
  • Whether packaging and plastics remain profitable as digital revenue and IP monetization remain uncertain.
  • Developments in patent reviews, appeals, litigation stays, and settlements, including the Apple matter.
  • Progress remediating the material weakness in disclosure controls.