ASTRONICS CORP quarterly report, Q3 FY2013

Astronics Corporation — Q3 2013 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Three and nine months ended September 28, 2013; unaudited. Unless noted, amounts are in millions of dollars. Astronics supplies aerospace systems and military test, training and simulation products through its Aerospace and Test Systems segments.

Financial performance

MetricQ3 2013Q3 2012Nine months 2013Nine months 2012
Sales$89.7$68.9$234.5$199.0
Gross profit$23.8$16.7$62.7$51.9
Gross margin26.5%24.3%26.7%26.1%
Operating income$12.4$7.7$31.4$24.7
Net income$7.2$4.9$20.9$16.2
Diluted EPS$0.39$0.27$1.14$0.89
  • Q3 sales rose 30.2%; nine-month sales rose 17.8%. Aerospace drove the growth, while Test Systems sales declined.
  • Q3 Aerospace operating margin improved to 17.6% from 16.1%; nine-month margin was 18.0% versus 17.5%. Test Systems remained loss-making: nine-month operating loss was $2.9 million, unchanged at a 40.0% margin.
  • Operating cash flow was $34.1 million for the first nine months, up from $17.1 million. Investing used $140.7 million, principally reflecting the Peco acquisition; financing provided $167.4 million, primarily from acquisition debt. Capital spending guidance for 2013 was approximately $7–$24 million.
  • At September 28, cash was $68.2 million, current assets $191.9 million and current liabilities $56.5 million. Total debt was approximately $198.7 million, including $188.1 million long-term debt. No revolver balance was outstanding; reported remaining borrowing capacity was $51.5 million, with $8.8 million of letters of credit outstanding.

Changes, acquisitions and outlook

  • Peco was acquired on July 18 for $136 million in cash and added $15.7 million of sales from acquisition through quarter-end. The acquisition substantially increased goodwill and intangible assets and was funded mainly with a new $190 million term loan. Peco contributed little operating profit in Q3, partly due to $2.0 million of purchase-accounting inventory charges.
  • Management expected a further approximately $3.0 million Peco inventory fair-value charge in Q4 and Peco intangible amortization of approximately $1.7 million in Q4. It forecast 2013 Aerospace sales of $325–$335 million, including $32–$34 million of Peco sales for the remainder of 2013 and $1–$2 million from AeroSat. Test Systems sales were expected to be approximately $10 million. Full-year engineering and development expense was forecast at $52–$54 million; Q4 effective tax rate at 31%–33%.
  • Backlog was $168.2 million, including $39.7 million for Peco, versus $114.5 million at December 31, 2012. Aerospace backlog was $159.5 million; Test Systems backlog was $8.7 million. Management expected approximately $86.0 million of Aerospace backlog to ship during the remainder of 2013.
  • After quarter-end, Astronics agreed to acquire AeroSat for $12 million plus contingent payments of up to $53 million, and PGA Electronic for €21.4 million (approximately $28 million), payable approximately 60% in cash and 40% in Astronics shares.

Risks and unusual items

  • Panasonic accounted for 30% of nine-month revenue and Boeing for 12%, creating significant customer concentration. Management cited aircraft production rates, government funding, customer demand, program changes, vendor performance and acquisition integration as risks.
  • The company’s debt was primarily variable-rate; its credit agreement is secured by substantially all company assets and includes leverage and fixed-charge coverage covenants. Astronics reported compliance at quarter-end. The term-loan payment schedule includes a large 2018 maturity.
  • A German patent-infringement action brought by Lufthansa Technik remained unresolved; Astronics disputed the claim and said it could not reasonably estimate potential loss. The company did not expect ordinary-course legal proceedings overall to have a material adverse effect. It settled a separate AE Liquidation matter in Q3 with no significant operating impact.
  • Peco integration, potential unknown liabilities and internal-control integration were identified as risks. Management stated that its disclosure controls were effective at quarter-end and that no materially affecting internal-control changes occurred during the quarter.
  • Q3 gross-margin improvement reflected higher volume and lower warranty and inventory-obsolescence expense versus the prior year, but Peco purchase-accounting charges partly offset the benefit. The filing says interim results are not necessarily indicative of full-year results.

Most important facts to verify

  • Whether Aerospace guidance, Peco contribution and the anticipated Q4 inventory and amortization charges were achieved.
  • Debt repayment, floating-rate exposure, covenant headroom and the substantial 2018 maturity; the filing’s term-loan schedule and MD&A describe the maturity amount differently ($128.25 million versus a $123.5 million balloon).
  • Customer concentration and the sustainability of Panasonic and Boeing demand, as well as Aerospace backlog conversion.
  • Integration, purchase-price accounting and contingent consideration for Peco and the subsequent AeroSat and PGA transactions.
  • Developments in the Lufthansa Technik litigation and any financial exposure from the Peco multiemployer pension plan.