EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC. annual report, FY2011

Euronet Worldwide, Inc. — FY 2011 Form 10-K

Reporting period: Fiscal year ended December 31, 2011. This is an annual filing, not a standalone Q4 filing; quarterly figures below identify the fourth quarter. Euronet provides electronic payment processing through EFT Processing, epay and Money Transfer segments. epay generated approximately 58% of FY 2011 revenue, Money Transfer 25% and EFT Processing 17%.

Financial performance

MetricFY 2011FY 2010
Revenue$1,161.3 million$1,038.3 million
Operating income$79.1 million$5.3 million
Net income (loss) attributable to Euronet$37.0 million$(38.4) million
Diluted EPS$0.71$(0.75)
Cash from operations$99.3 million$108.1 million
Cash and cash equivalents at year-end$170.7 million$187.2 million
  • Revenue rose 12%, supported by acquisitions, higher money-transfer volumes and favorable currency translation. Operating margin was approximately 6.8% in 2011.
  • 2010 operating income included a $70.9 million non-cash goodwill impairment; 2011 had no impairment charge. Management said operating income excluding impairment increased 4% in 2011.
  • Cash used in investing was $124.1 million, including $78.7 million for acquisitions and $46.0 million for property and equipment. Financing activities provided $13.9 million. Cash declined $16.6 million during the year.
  • Year-end current assets were $754.0 million and current liabilities $774.5 million: negative working capital of $20.5 million and a current ratio of 0.97. Management attributed the deterioration largely to classifying the convertible debentures as current ahead of the October 2012 holder put option.
  • Balance-sheet debt obligations were $332.3 million, including $165.2 million carrying value of convertible debentures and $166.2 million of term-loan and revolving-credit borrowings; capital leases were separately reported at $6.4 million. The debentures had $171.4 million principal outstanding and holders could require repurchase at par in October 2012.

Fourth-quarter results

Q4 2011 revenue was $319.4 million, operating income $23.0 million, net income attributable to Euronet $11.0 million and diluted EPS $0.21. Q4 2010 revenue was $283.8 million, operating loss $49.8 million, attributable net loss $60.7 million and diluted loss per share $1.19; the 2010 quarter included the $70.9 million impairment charge.

Segment developments and material changes

  • EFT Processing: Revenue increased 2% to $199.2 million, while operating income fell 13% to $33.2 million. ATM transactions rose 19% to 943 million and year-end ATMs increased 32% to 14,224. Lower transaction fees in Germany and lower interchange fees in Poland pressured revenue per ATM and margins.
  • epay: Revenue increased 13% to $677.1 million and operating income was $56.8 million, versus a $24.3 million operating loss in 2010, principally reflecting the absence of the prior-year impairment and growth in Brazil and Germany. Transactions rose 19% to 1.064 billion. Australia and the U.K. faced transaction declines; management expected a Brazilian mobile operator’s distribution change to weigh on epay Brazil revenue into 2012.
  • Money Transfer: Revenue rose 17% to $285.3 million and operating income rose 28% to $17.1 million. Transactions increased 15% to 24.3 million, with growth in non-U.S. markets and additional products. U.S.-to-Mexico volumes recovered in the second half and were approximately flat for the full year versus 2010.
  • 2011 acquisitions included cadooz, a German vouchers and incentives provider, and ATM/card-processing businesses in Poland and Romania. Acquisition cash outflow was $78.7 million.

Outlook, risks and unusual items

  • No formal revenue or earnings guidance is provided in the filing. Management estimated 2012 capital expenditures of approximately $40–$50 million and expected operating cash, cash on hand and available credit to fund obligations and planned investment, while noting financing terms cannot be assured.
  • Management described seasonality: EFT revenue may be 5%–10% lower in Q1 than Q4; epay about 5% lower; Money Transfer typically sees a 5%–10% Q1 transaction decline versus Q4.
  • A late-2011 criminal security breach affected a European processing unit representing less than 5% of company revenue, profits and transactions. Related Q4 expense was $0.4 million. No claims had been asserted; the potential loss range was not estimable, though management did not expect a material net impact after insurance.
  • A U.S. Department of Justice antitrust investigation concerning possible price collusion in transfers to the Dominican Republic remained unresolved. The filing does not provide a reliable estimate of potential loss or outcome.
  • Other key exposures include foreign exchange (about 80% of 2011 revenue was generated outside the U.S.; management estimated a 10% currency move could affect annualized reported net income and working capital by approximately $25–$35 million), variable-rate debt, acquisition integration and goodwill risk, changing interchange and commission rates, regulatory and anti-money-laundering compliance, and competitive pressure.
  • The company reported effective internal control over financial reporting; KPMG issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements and internal controls.

Investor verification priorities

  • Review the October 2012 convertible-debenture put: $171.4 million principal, liquidity sources and refinancing or repayment plans.
  • Assess whether segment growth and margin trends persist, particularly German and Polish EFT pricing, epay Brazil and Australia, and Money Transfer expansion outside the U.S.
  • Monitor claims, insurance recoveries and any regulatory or customer consequences from the security breach, as well as developments in the DOJ investigation.
  • Reconcile cash generation with acquisition spending, capital expenditure plans, restricted cash and negative working capital; note that much cash is held outside the U.S. and may have tax consequences if repatriated.
  • Check debt covenant headroom, floating-rate exposure, and the company’s sensitivity to foreign exchange movements.