Future Fintech Group Inc. annual report, FY2016

Future Fintech Group Inc. (filing cover: SkyPeople Fruit Juice, Inc.) — FY 2016 Form 10-K

Period and identity: The filing covers the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016; it is not a standalone fourth-quarter report. The submitted filing identifies the registrant as SkyPeople Fruit Juice, Inc., a Florida holding company operating primarily in China. This differs from the requested company name, Future Fintech Group Inc.; verify issuer identity and corporate history before attributing these results.

Business context and results

The company produced and sold fruit juice concentrates, bottled fruit beverages and other fruit-related products. Revenue was concentrated in China and export markets, with products sold largely through distributors. Product mix shifted: concentrates were 51% of revenue, beverages 43%, and other products 6%, versus 49%, 51% and 0%, respectively, in 2015.

Metric20162015
Revenue$34.4 million$86.4 million
Gross profit / margin$9.2 million / 27%$26.1 million / 30%
Operating expenses$6.9 million$15.9 million
Income from operations$2.2 million$10.2 million
Interest expense$1.7 million$3.9 million
Continuing operations, attributable to companyLoss of $0.8 millionIncome of $2.9 million
Discontinued operationsLoss of $4.8 million—
Net income (loss) attributable to company stockholdersLoss of $5.5 millionIncome of $2.9 million
Basic and diluted EPSLoss of $1.41Income of $0.11
Net cash from (used in) operating activities$(34.4) million$104.3 million

Revenue changes, margins and unusual items

  • Revenue fell 60% year over year. Beverage sales declined 66% to $14.8 million amid tougher competition and reduced in-store demand as consumers increasingly bought groceries online. Apple-related sales fell 61% to $7.7 million; kiwi concentrate and puree sales fell 92% to $0.7 million; pear concentrate sales fell 31% to $9.3 million.
  • Consolidated gross margin decreased to 27% from 30%. Beverage margin declined to 32% from 41%, pear margin to 23% from 35%, and kiwi margin to 9% from 17%. Apple margin rose to 26% from 8%, but apple sales remained substantially lower.
  • Management attributed weaker concentrate volumes to international competition, lower demand, higher raw-fruit costs and weather-related supply constraints. Operating expenses decreased, but not enough to offset the revenue decline.
  • The company classified its loss-making Huludao Wonder operation as discontinued and began winding it down in December 2016. The discontinued-operation loss was $4.8 million; the filing also reports approximately $2.4 million of impairment on its production equipment. Yingkou, which had not produced for two years, incurred a further $2.1 million equipment impairment.
  • Government subsidies fell sharply to about $0.03 million from $1.2 million. The filing gives inconsistent 2016 subsidy figures in different sections ($16,738 in the income statement versus $30,213 in the note); verify the reported amount.

Liquidity, debt and capital allocation

  • Cash and cash equivalents were $1.14 million at year-end, down from $50.0 million; restricted cash was nil, versus $3.1 million in 2015. Working capital was reported at $24.7 million, down from $42.3 million.
  • Operating cash flow was negative $34.4 million, compared with positive $104.3 million in 2015. Investing activities used $21.0 million; financing activities used $24.1 million. The filing attributes substantial cash use to orchard-related payments and deposits.
  • Current assets were $101.6 million and current liabilities $77.0 million. Current assets included $58.1 million of advances to suppliers and other current assets and $28.4 million of other receivables. Assess recoverability and classification of these balances; cash alone was limited.
  • Short-term bank loans totaled $29.4 million and capital-lease obligations $14.5 million, for disclosed bank and lease obligations of approximately $43.9 million. A separate lawsuit seeks repayment of a 40 million RMB loan, approximately $6.35 million, from Huludao Wonder; determine whether and how this overdue exposure is reflected in reported liabilities.
  • The company reported paying approximately $30 million as a refundable deposit toward a kiwi-orchard purchase, $37.4 million for the first ten years of a kiwi-orchard lease and $24.0 million for the first ten years of an orange-orchard lease. The orchard purchase remained subject to approvals and definitive agreements. The balance-sheet deposit disclosures contain apparent inconsistencies in subtotals and classifications.
  • Management said cash flows from operations, anticipated receipts, cash on hand and trade credit were expected to fund operating needs for at least 12 months, excluding potential production-capacity expansion. A subsequent April 2017 registered direct offering was expected to raise $2.67 million gross, accompanied by warrants; it is a post-year-end financing, not 2016 cash.

Outlook, risks and governance

  • Management planned to expand beverage distribution, develop higher-margin products and complete construction projects. Yidu project infrastructure was targeted for completion in Q2 2017 and its distribution center in Q4 2017. Construction on the Suizhong project was suspended amid competition; the land-use-right certificate had not been issued because payment was incomplete.
  • Key risks include highly seasonal production and weather-sensitive fruit supply, volatile input prices, competitive pressure and distributor reliance; food-safety and licensing requirements; PRC regulatory, currency-conversion and cross-border cash-transfer risks; and uncertainty over the company’s historical PRC incorporation and offshore ownership arrangements.
  • Two material legal matters were pending: a Cinda Shaanxi Branch claim alleging guarantees for supplier financing of approximately $6.1 million, which the company contests, and the Huludao Wonder bank-loan lawsuit described above. Huludao’s pledged property was temporarily frozen against transfer.
  • The company disclosed that it did not maintain product-liability or product-recall insurance. One supplier accounted for 62% of purchases in 2016. Related-party control was concentrated: the filing says Yongke Xue controlled 50.2% of common stock through an entity, while the beneficial-ownership table reports 54.2%; reconcile this discrepancy.
  • The company received Nasdaq listing-compliance notices after late filings, but reported that it regained compliance and the matter was closed on February 2, 2017. It also changed independent auditors multiple times in 2016; management reported effective disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting. The auditor expressed an unqualified opinion on the financial statements but did not opine on internal-control effectiveness.

Most important facts to verify

  • Whether this SkyPeople Fruit Juice filing is the correct issuer filing for the requested Future Fintech Group Inc.
  • Cash availability and the collectability, timing and proper classification of the large receivable, supplier-advance and orchard-deposit balances; confirm the filing’s inconsistent deposit figures.
  • The status, accounting treatment and potential cash impact of the two lawsuits, the overdue Huludao loan and related pledged assets.
  • Actual 2017 funding needs and the terms, net proceeds and dilution from the subsequent offering and warrants; test management’s 12-month liquidity expectation against operating cash burn.
  • Progress, remaining costs, approvals and expected returns for the orchard commitments and Yidu project, and the eventual disposition of Huludao Wonder.
  • Reconcile reported subsidy income, ownership percentages, share counts and beneficial-ownership disclosures, including the reverse split and the 2016 TSD transaction.