HEARTLAND EXPRESS INC quarterly report, Q2 FY2014

Heartland Express, Inc. — Q2 2014 Form 10-Q

Business context and period: The filing covers the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014. Heartland is a truckload carrier offering dry van, temperature-controlled, brokerage, and dedicated services. Results include Gordon Trucking, Inc. (GTI), acquired in November 2013, so year-over-year revenue and expense comparisons reflect the acquisition as well as operating changes.

Financial performance

  • Second quarter: Revenue was $226.8 million, up 69.3% from $134.0 million. Operating income was $40.6 million, up from $29.4 million; net income was $26.5 million, up 38.3% from $19.1 million. Diluted EPS was $0.30 versus $0.23.
  • First six months: Revenue was $451.3 million, up 68.2%; operating income was $61.3 million versus $59.6 million; net income was $40.6 million versus $38.9 million. Diluted EPS was unchanged at $0.46.
  • Margins: Operating ratio was 82.1% in Q2 versus 78.1% a year earlier, and 86.4% for the first half versus 77.8%. Net margin was 11.7% in Q2 versus 14.3%, and 9.0% for the first half versus 14.5%.
  • Cash flow and investment: First-half operating cash flow was $78.1 million versus $50.3 million. Net investing cash use was $46.0 million, including $43.0 million in net equipment purchases; financing cash use was $33.8 million, primarily reflecting $32.0 million of net line-of-credit repayments. Cash declined $1.6 million to $16.1 million.
  • Debt and liquidity: Long-term debt was $43.0 million, down from $75.0 million at December 31, 2013. The company had $201.5 million of available revolver capacity and was in compliance with its covenants. Total assets were $751.4 million and stockholders’ equity was $435.2 million at June 30.

Changes, outlook, and risks

  • Management attributed revenue growth mainly to higher loaded miles and GTI; first-half fuel surcharge revenue increased to $92.1 million from $55.2 million. Expense growth also reflected the larger fleet, added employees, leased equipment and facilities, and brokerage activity. Fuel cost per mile, net of surcharges, fell 21.8% in the first half, which management linked to fuel efficiency, surcharges, fleet mix, and fewer out-of-route miles.
  • Management expects 2014 net capital expenditures of approximately $127 million to $137 million, mainly for fleet upgrades. It expects full-year equipment-sale gains to be approximately in line with 2013. Management said liquidity should be adequate for foreseeable needs; no earnings or revenue guidance was provided.
  • The return to the 125% declining-balance tractor depreciation method, effective July 2013, reduced first-half 2014 depreciation and increased operating income by $3.3 million. Equipment-sale gains were $15.9 million in the first half, down from $19.8 million.
  • Management expects the effective tax rate to be higher in the second half because it does not anticipate similar favorable tax adjustments. Gross unrecognized tax benefits were $12.1 million; management estimated a possible decrease of $0.9 million to $1.9 million over the next 12 months.
  • Key stated risks include driver recruitment and retention, fuel and equipment costs, customer concentration and freight demand, regulation, insurance claims, and successful integration of GTI. The company reported routine litigation and $105.9 million of estimated equipment purchase commitments for the remainder of 2014 and 2015. Related-party equipment and terminal leases and transactions are also disclosed.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • How much of reported growth and margin change reflects GTI versus organic performance, and whether GTI integration improves operating efficiency.
  • Whether driver availability, compensation, and utilization affect capacity, costs, and service levels.
  • Progress toward the $127 million–$137 million capital expenditure outlook and the cash returns on fleet investment.
  • Whether equipment-sale gains and the depreciation-method benefit are sustainable or materially affect comparisons.
  • Developments in uncertain state tax positions, related-party arrangements, and the company’s ability to maintain liquidity and covenant compliance.