MYR GROUP INC. annual report, FY2013

MYR Group Inc. — 2013 Form 10-K

Reporting period: Fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. The filing was signed March 5, 2014. MYR is a specialty electrical contractor operating in Transmission and Distribution (T&D) and Commercial and Industrial (C&I) markets.

Financial performance

Metric20132012Change
Revenue$902.7 million$999.0 millionDown 9.6%
Gross profit / margin$124.9 million / 13.8%$118.7 million / 11.9%Gross profit up 5.2%; margin up 1.9 percentage points
Operating income / margin$55.6 million / 6.2%$55.8 million / 5.6%Income roughly flat; margin improved
Net income$34.8 million$34.3 millionUp 1.5%
Diluted EPS$1.61$1.60Up $0.01
Operating cash flow$95.1 million$30.0 millionUp $65.1 million
Capital expenditures$42.7 million$37.2 millionUp $5.5 million

Gross margin improved with better project execution, higher fleet utilization, and a more labor-and-equipment-intensive revenue mix. Management attributed approximately 0.8 percentage points of 2013 gross margin to improved margins on several large transmission projects. Operating cash flow also benefited from working-capital movements, including cash generated as large projects neared completion.

Balance sheet and liquidity at year-end: Cash was $76.5 million, working capital was $119.6 million, total assets were $525.4 million, and stockholders’ equity was $296.1 million. The company had no debt outstanding and $156.6 million available under its $175 million revolving credit facility, with $18.4 million of letters of credit outstanding. It was in compliance with its credit covenants.

Segments and quarterly results

  • T&D: Revenue was $722.4 million, down 12.8%; operating income was $81.4 million versus $80.5 million, and segment operating margin rose to 11.3% from 9.7%. Lower material and subcontractor costs on large projects and reduced storm work contributed to lower reported revenue.
  • C&I: Revenue was $180.3 million, up 5.9%; operating income increased to $10.4 million from $7.6 million, with margin rising to 5.8% from 4.5%.
  • Fourth quarter, unaudited: Revenue was $254.6 million, gross profit $33.8 million, and net income $10.0 million, compared with $247.8 million, $32.9 million, and $9.8 million, respectively, in Q4 2012. Diluted EPS was $0.46 in both quarters.

Material changes, outlook and risks

  • Backlog fell to $326.1 million at December 31, 2013, from $497.6 million a year earlier. Management said substantial work on previously awarded multi-year projects was not replaced by projects of similar size and scope. Backlog is not a standalone indicator of future revenue.
  • Storm restoration revenue declined to $14.6 million from $41.3 million in 2012. The top ten customers represented 57.8% of 2013 revenue; no individual customer exceeded 10% that year.
  • Management expected continued small- and medium-sized transmission bidding activity and improvement in distribution and C&I markets in 2014. It anticipated bidding on several multi-year transmission projects over $50 million in contract value during 2014–2015, while noting that major construction could lag awards and timing remained uncertain.
  • Management expected 2014 capital expenditures to be similar to 2013, focused mainly on equipment and tooling. It cited long-term transmission investment, grid upgrades and renewable integration as potential demand drivers, while noting uncertainty around project awards, permits, competition, and renewable-energy incentives.
  • Key risks include cyclical customer spending, intense price competition, fixed-price contract overruns, project delays and cancellations, labor availability and safety, weather, customer concentration and collection risk, bonding capacity, and uncertain estimates under percentage-of-completion accounting. About 92% of craft employees were union-represented; certain multi-employer pension plans were classified as critical or endangered, though management reported no known significant current liability.
  • Legal contingencies: A Florida accident judgment included $3.6 million in punitive damages; the company recorded a $2.3 million reserve and appealed. A separate Superfund-site case alleged damages of up to $140 million; the company said its potential liability could not then be assessed. Management did not expect ordinary legal proceedings overall to materially affect results, but outcomes remain uncertain.
  • The company reported effective disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting; the independent auditor issued unqualified opinions on the financial statements and internal controls.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether the sharply lower backlog was replenished through subsequent awards, and how much converts to revenue and profit.
  • Whether 2013 margin gains on large transmission projects are repeatable, given the role of project-specific execution and estimates.
  • Whether strong operating cash flow persists after the favorable working-capital contribution from project completions.
  • Developments in the Florida appeal and Ashland Superfund litigation, including any changes to reserves or potential exposure.
  • 2014 capital spending, project awards, customer concentration, and covenant/bonding capacity as activity and working-capital needs change.