Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. annual report, FY2016

Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. — FY 2016 Form 10-K

Reporting period: Fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. The filing also reports fourth-quarter results; this is an annual filing, not a standalone quarterly report.

Business context

Intellia is an early-stage genome-editing biotechnology company developing potential CRISPR/Cas9 therapeutics. Its programs were in discovery or preclinical development at year-end; it had no approved products, product sales, or clinical-stage programs described in the filing. Its pipeline includes in vivo liver programs—ATTR, hepatitis B, alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, and inborn errors of metabolism—and partnered ex vivo CAR-T and hematopoietic stem-cell programs.

Financial performance and liquidity

MetricFY 2016FY 2015
Collaboration revenue$16.5 million$6.0 million
Research and development expense$31.8 million$11.2 million
General and administrative expense$16.8 million$8.3 million
Total operating expenses$48.6 million$19.5 million
Operating loss$32.2 million$13.4 million
Net loss$31.6 million$12.4 million
Net loss per share$1.42$51.02
Operating cash flow$36.1 million provided$1.8 million used

Fourth-quarter 2016 collaboration revenue was $5.6 million and net loss was $10.6 million. Gross margins are not meaningful to the company’s reported operations because revenue was entirely from collaborations, not product sales.

At December 31, 2016, cash and cash equivalents were $273.1 million, working capital was $250.6 million, total assets were $299.0 million, and stockholders’ equity was $209.8 million. Deferred revenue totaled $78.3 million, including $20.2 million current. The balance sheet reports no borrowings; property lease commitments totaled $30.9 million. Management estimated that year-end cash plus expected Novartis technology-access fees and research funding would fund operating expenses and capital expenditures through mid-2019, excluding potential collaboration milestones or extension fees.

Operating cash flow was boosted by collaboration receipts, especially Regeneron’s $75.0 million upfront payment; it should not be read as evidence of positive operating profitability. The company raised $170.5 million in net financing cash flow in 2016, including IPO and concurrent private-placement proceeds. It reported no dividends and no off-balance-sheet arrangements.

Material changes versus the prior year

  • Revenue increased to $16.5 million from $6.0 million, mainly reflecting the Regeneron collaboration signed in April 2016; the company recognized $8.7 million from Regeneron and $7.8 million from Novartis in 2016.
  • Net loss widened to $31.6 million from $12.4 million as operating expenses rose with research-program advancement, headcount growth, and public-company costs. R&D headcount increased from 38 to 77; total employees were 104 at year-end.
  • Cash and cash equivalents rose to $273.1 million from $75.8 million, following the IPO, private placements, and collaboration funding. The IPO sold 6.9 million shares at $18 per share.
  • Preferred stock converted to common stock in connection with the IPO. The company had 36.0 million common shares outstanding at December 31, 2016; the filing cautions that the substantial share-count increase affects year-over-year per-share comparisons.

Outlook, risks, and unusual items

  • Management expected 2017 R&D spending to increase as the team expanded and programs advanced. No clinical or product-revenue guidance was provided.
  • All lead programs remained early-stage, and CRISPR/Cas9 therapeutics had not been clinically validated. The company warned that delivery, editing accuracy, off-target effects, safety, efficacy, manufacturing, regulatory pathways, and patient acceptance remain uncertain.
  • Intellia depends on collaboration and license partners. Regeneron may select targets and has co-development and co-commercialization rights for the first selected target, ATTR; Novartis has rights in partnered CAR-T and HSC programs. Future milestones and royalties are contingent and uncertain.
  • Intellectual-property rights are a material risk. In February 2017, the PTAB dismissed the interference proceeding involving the UC/Vienna/Charpentier and Broad Institute patent claims without deciding which party had priority; the decision could be appealed, and the company warned of possible further prosecution or infringement disputes.
  • The company’s revenue depends on collaboration accounting and recognition over performance periods. At year-end, $78.3 million of deferred revenue remained and revenue timing could change with revised research plans or estimates.
  • Lease commitments were $30.9 million. Management also expected lease-accounting changes to result in recognition of a significant lease obligation upon adoption of the new standard.
  • Management reported effective disclosure controls as of year-end. The filing did not include management’s internal-control-over-financial-reporting assessment or an auditor attestation because of the transition period for newly public companies.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether the mid-2019 cash runway estimate remains achievable, given increasing R&D costs and reliance on collaboration funding.
  • Progress, timing, and safety evidence for preclinical programs, particularly delivery and off-target editing results; no clinical efficacy evidence was reported.
  • Collaboration terms, partner target selections, termination rights, and the likelihood and timing of contingent milestones or royalties.
  • Developments in CRISPR/Cas9 patent prosecution, appeals, licensing rights, and potential infringement litigation.
  • Cash deployment, equity dilution, deferred-revenue recognition assumptions, and the company’s lease and other contractual commitments.