Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. annual report, FY2014

Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. — 2014 Form 10-K

Business context and period. This annual report covers the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014; it is not a quarterly report. Pangaea provides drybulk shipping and logistics services, principally through contracts of affreightment (COAs), voyage charters and time charters. Its fleet combines owned and short-term chartered-in vessels. The October 1, 2014 merger with Quartet made the company publicly traded; the merger was accounted for as a reverse acquisition, with pre-merger operating results representing Bulk Partners.

Financial and operating performance

Amounts below are in U.S. dollars; figures are rounded. Percentages and margins are calculated from reported figures.

Metric20142013Change / context
Total revenue$398.3 million$392.5 millionUp 1.5%
Voyage revenue$345.2 million$336.2 millionUp 3%
Charter revenue$53.0 million$56.3 millionDown 6%
Operating income (loss)$(2.5) million$21.4 millionOperating margin: (0.6%) vs. 5.4%
Net income (loss)$(13.6) million$15.5 millionNet margin: (3.4%) vs. 4.0%
Net income (loss) attributable to Pangaea$(12.1) million$15.5 millionBasic and diluted loss per share: $(1.61) in 2014
Adjusted EBITDA$20.7 million$31.0 millionDown 33%; margin 5.2% vs. 7.9%
Operating cash flow$24.6 million$21.1 millionUp $3.5 million
Cash and cash equivalents$29.8 million$18.9 millionRestricted cash additional $1.0 million
Total assets$332.5 million$330.4 million
Third-party debt$108.2 million$102.4 millionSelected financial data; excludes related-party debt
Current related-party debt$59.1 million$7.6 millionMuch of the increase reflects loans reclassified as payable on demand
Working capital$(59.1) million$(13.8) millionDeficit widened materially

Total shipping days rose 7% to 16,953. The filing reports a 2014 TCE rate of $12,378 per day in selected data, while the MD&A cites $12,317; it reports $12,345 for 2013. The source text does not reconcile the 2014 figures.

Material changes versus 2013

  • Revenue grew modestly as shipping days increased, while reported TCE rates were broadly flat. Voyage days rose 9%; time-charter days fell 1%.
  • Operating results deteriorated substantially: charter hire expense rose 14% to $149.7 million, and charter expense increased to 38% of revenue from 33%. The company attributed pressure in part to vessels chartered at higher rates early in the year as the market subsequently weakened.
  • Voyage expense decreased 3% to $189.5 million, including lower fuel expense and fewer cargo sublets; vessel operating expense rose 29% to $29.6 million as ownership days increased.
  • The company recorded $11.5 million of vessel impairment losses, including approximately $10.0 million associated with Bulk Discovery, Nordic Barents and Nordic Bothnia, and approximately $1.5 million for Bulk Cajun. It also recorded $3.9 million of gains on vessel sales.
  • Net cash used in investing activities was $39.2 million, versus $84.0 million in 2013, reflecting vessel purchases, newbuilding deposits, drydockings and $23.3 million of vessel-sale proceeds. Financing provided $25.5 million, compared with $62.1 million in 2013.

Liquidity, debt and capital commitments

  • At year-end, current liabilities were $144.7 million against current assets of $84.9 million. The company reported a $59.1 million working-capital deficit and a $12.1 million attributable net loss.
  • Secured debt totaled $106.2 million before unamortized bank fees, including $17.8 million current and $87.4 million long-term net of fees. A $3.0 million line of credit was also outstanding. Debt repayment obligations were approximately $17.8 million in 2015, $19.4 million in 2016 and $28.6 million in 2017.
  • The company was out of compliance with certain secured-debt covenants at December 31, 2014, including debt-service coverage, EBITDA-to-fixed-charges and Long Wharf debt-service coverage requirements; it obtained waivers. Other credit facilities were reported compliant. Covenant breaches, cross-defaults and lender remedies could constrain liquidity and operations.
  • Management cited written shareholder commitments to provide loan support and an agreement in principle to reclassify certain NBHC and BVH related-party debt as equity. These measures were important to management’s assessment of the company’s ability to continue as a going concern; the filing does not quantify the support commitment in this excerpt.
  • Newbuilding obligations included two Ultramax vessels and an Ice-Class Panamax vessel scheduled for 2016, plus two Ultramax deliveries reported elsewhere in the filing as scheduled for 2017. The contractual-obligations table shows $75.3 million of purchase obligations, including $68.8 million due in one to three years. Two Ice-Class Panamax vessels were delivered in February 2015 and funded with a $45 million loan.

Outlook, risks and unusual items

  • No formal earnings or revenue guidance is provided. Management’s stated plans include growing strategic COAs, expanding the owned fleet, increasing operations in Southeast Asia and the Middle East, and maintaining shorter-term charter-ins. Market conditions remained weak amid excess drybulk vessel supply and soft rates; management said it reduced chartered-in volume and shortened future charter periods as conditions changed.
  • Key exposures include volatile freight and charter rates, vessel values, fuel prices, interest rates, customer and counterparty credit, vessel availability and off-hire, seasonal demand, environmental regulation, and access to financing. The company reported 250 off-hire days in 2014 versus 61 in 2013, mostly related to scheduled drydockings.
  • A bunker-swap counterparty bankruptcy caused approximately $2.1 million of losses; legal actions generated approximately $1.5 million of expense. Fuel swaps had a year-end fair-value liability, and falling bunker prices affected 2014 derivative results. No FFAs were open at year-end.
  • Disclosure controls were deemed ineffective at December 31, 2014. Management identified material weaknesses in the financial close and GAAP review process, segregation of duties, and review of assumptions used in vessel impairment analysis. Management reported remediation efforts, including hiring accounting personnel; the auditor did not provide an internal-control attestation.
  • No material legal proceeding was reported as pending or threatened. The company did not declare common-share dividends in 2014; debt restrictions and liquidity needs may limit future distributions.
  • The filing gives inconsistent drydocking cost estimates: one section cites $3.0 million for 2015 and $1.5 million for 2016, while another cites $4.6 million and $0.1 million, respectively. The source text does not explain the difference.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Obtain current status and terms of covenant waivers, shareholder support commitments and proposed related-party debt-to-equity reclassifications; assess any cross-default or acceleration exposure.
  • Reconcile the working-capital deficit, on-demand related-party balances, near-term debt maturities and funding available for newbuilding commitments.
  • Confirm the 2014 TCE rate and reconcile the conflicting drydocking estimates, impairment amounts and vessel delivery schedules in the filing.
  • Review the assumptions behind vessel impairment tests and the consequences of further declines in freight rates or vessel values.
  • Track remediation of material weaknesses and the effectiveness of financial reporting controls, particularly around close procedures, segregation of duties and impairment assumptions.