VICOR CORP quarterly report, Q2 FY2015

Vicor Corporation (VICR) — Q2 2015 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Three and six months ended June 30, 2015. Unaudited results cover Vicor’s power-conversion products and systems businesses, reported across BBU, VI Chip and Picor segments.

Financial performance and liquidity

MetricQ2 2015Six months 2015
Revenue$56.1 million; +5.2% year over year and -12.3% sequentially$120.1 million; +12.7% year over year
Gross margin$26.5 million; 47.2% of revenue, versus 42.5% in Q2 2014$55.4 million; 46.1%, versus 42.6% in 2014
Operating income (loss)$0.8 million, versus a $5.0 million loss$4.4 million, versus a $10.5 million loss
Net income (loss) attributable to Vicor$0.8 million, or $0.02 per diluted share, versus a $4.8 million loss, or $0.13 per share$4.2 million, or $0.11 per diluted share, versus a $10.2 million loss, or $0.26 per share
Operating cash flowNot separately provided for the quarter$12.3 million, versus cash used of $2.2 million in 2014
  • Cash and cash equivalents were $65.1 million at June 30, up from $55.2 million at year-end 2014. Working capital was $97.5 million and the current ratio was 5.1:1.
  • Six-month capital expenditures were $3.3 million; capital expenditure commitments were approximately $1.0 million. Cash rose by $10.0 million during the half.
  • Total liabilities were $25.3 million, primarily current operating liabilities and deferred revenue. No borrowings are listed in the balance sheet presented in the filing.
  • Inventory was $25.5 million, down 3.3% from December 31, 2014. The company reported no share repurchases during the half.

Changes, outlook and material matters

  • Year-over-year revenue growth for Q2 came from VI Chip and Picor, while BBU revenue declined. For the first half, VI Chip and Picor growth more than offset a modest BBU decline. Management attributed growth primarily to bookings from a major datacenter customer.
  • Q2 bookings fell 16.5% year over year and 19.2% sequentially. Backlog scheduled for shipment within 12 months fell to $41.6 million from $49.8 million at the end of Q1. Management said bookings remained unpredictable and the near-term outlook uncertain.
  • Management cited datacenter voltage-regulation standard changes as delaying bookings and shifting revenue timing; weakness in defense electronics and certain geographic markets; and exposure to demand swings from a small number of early-adopting, high-volume customers.
  • Gross-margin improvement reflected product mix, higher-margin Picor products and, sequentially, average selling-price improvement in BBU programs and benefits from consolidating Westcor manufacturing in Andover. Lower SG&A chiefly reflected reduced SynQor litigation legal fees; litigation costs and outcome remain uncertain.
  • Management said cash and expected operating cash flows should fund planned operations and capital equipment purchases for the foreseeable future. The filing provides no specific revenue or earnings guidance.
  • The SynQor patent case remained pending. Vicor disputed infringement and said it did not consider a loss probable, but could not estimate a possible loss range. Patent-review proceedings had mixed developments; trial-related proceedings were scheduled for 2015 and 2016.
  • A failed-auction student-loan security was carried as a long-term investment at $2.6 million, against $3.0 million par and cost, including a $386,000 unrealized loss. It is valued using Level 3 assumptions; management warned further market deterioration or a credit-rating decline could cause additional losses or impairment.
  • Vicor maintained a full valuation allowance against remaining domestic deferred tax assets, approximately $25.8 million. An Italian tax inspection was unresolved, though management did not expect a material impact. Management reported disclosure controls were effective and no material change in internal control during the quarter.

Investor verification priorities

  • Track bookings, backlog, major-customer concentration and the effect of the datacenter voltage-regulation transition on shipments and revenue.
  • Monitor whether gross-margin gains and lower legal expenses persist, particularly as SynQor litigation progresses.
  • Review the failed-auction security’s valuation assumptions, liquidity and impairment exposure.
  • Follow the SynQor case and patent-review outcomes, including any change in Vicor’s assessment of potential loss.
  • Assess cash generation and planned capital spending against management’s liquidity expectations, and monitor the Italian tax matter and deferred-tax valuation allowance.