AMERISERV FINANCIAL INC quarterly report, Q3 FY2014

AmeriServ Financial, Inc. — Q3 2014 Form 10-Q

Business context and period. Community bank and financial services company headquartered in Pennsylvania, with banking, trust and investment advisory, and insurance operations. This unaudited report covers the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2014; balance-sheet comparisons are to December 31, 2013. Amounts are in millions unless otherwise noted.

Financial performance and position

MetricQ3 2014Q3 2013Nine months 2014Nine months 2013
Net interest income$8.403$8.200$25.312$24.263
Net interest margin3.42%3.46%3.48%3.52%
Non-interest income$3.593$3.986$10.763$11.877
Non-interest expense$11.243$10.413$32.601$31.477
Net income$0.365$1.226$2.274$3.352
Net income available to common shareholders$0.312$1.173$2.116$3.195
Diluted earnings per share$0.02$0.06$0.11$0.17
Annualized return on average assets0.14%0.47%0.29%0.44%
Annualized return on average equity1.25%4.44%2.64%4.05%
  • Revenue and earnings. Q3 total revenue, as presented in segment reporting, was $11.996 million versus $12.186 million a year earlier. Higher net interest income was outweighed by lower non-interest income and higher expenses. For the first nine months, net interest income rose 4.3%, but lower non-interest income and higher expenses drove common earnings down 33.8%.
  • Balance sheet at September 30. Assets were $1.070 billion, up 1.4% since year-end; net loans were $804.3 million, up $31.1 million; deposits were $872.2 million, up $17.6 million. Cash and cash equivalents were $23.5 million, down $6.6 million. Shareholders’ equity was $116.1 million.
  • Cash flow, nine months. Operating activities provided $2.1 million; investing activities used $22.6 million; financing activities provided $14.0 million. Cash and cash equivalents fell from $30.1 million to $23.5 million, principally as loan funding exceeded principal collections and investment cash flows were used to support loan growth.
  • Debt and liquidity. Total borrowed funds were $76.5 million, down from $79.6 million at year-end. Short-term borrowings declined to $26.4 million, while FHLB advances increased to $37.0 million from $25.0 million. The loan-to-deposit ratio was 93.3%. Management reported $348 million of available overnight FHLB borrowing capacity and $39 million of unsecured correspondent-bank lines.
  • Capital and credit quality. The company reported a 15.00% consolidated total risk-based capital ratio, 11.44% Tier 1 leverage ratio, and 7.86% tangible common equity to tangible assets; it was categorized as well capitalized. Non-performing assets including TDRs were $3.9 million, or 0.48% of loans and OREO, versus $4.1 million and 0.52% at year-end. The allowance for loan losses was $9.6 million, 1.18% of loans, with 298% coverage of non-performing loans.

Material changes and unusual items

  • Q3 and year-to-date results included a $669,000 goodwill impairment charge for West Chester Capital Advisors (WCCA). The former WCCA CEO’s departure, related litigation over alleged employment-agreement violations, and ensuing client attrition reduced projected earnings capacity.
  • Q3 included approximately $150,000 of consulting costs for a profitability improvement project. Professional fees rose $326,000 in the quarter and $913,000 year to date, reflecting consulting, litigation, and recurring outsourcing costs.
  • Loan growth supported net interest income, but net interest margin narrowed four basis points in both the quarter and year-to-date comparisons. Management attributed ongoing pressure in part to the low-rate environment.
  • Non-interest income declined 9.9% in Q3 and 9.4% year to date. Year-to-date mortgage loan-sale gains fell $365,000, mortgage fees fell $174,000, and bank-owned life insurance revenue fell $234,000.
  • No loan-loss provision was recorded in the first nine months of 2014. Net charge-offs were $522,000 year to date, compared with $1.3 million in 2013. Q3 net charge-offs were $568,000.
  • The effective tax rate was 34.5% year to date versus 29.6% in 2013; the non-deductible goodwill impairment contributed to the higher rate and a 51.5% Q3 rate.

Outlook, risks, and contingencies

Management’s stated priorities are community banking, loan/deposit and fee growth, improved trust-company profitability, and expense rationalization. The company said it was implementing approximately $1 million of non-interest expense savings for 2014 and expected to evaluate consulting recommendations beginning in Q4 2014 and continuing into 2015, with a significant expected payback. This is management’s expectation, not quantified earnings guidance. Management anticipated maintaining strong capital ratios through the remainder of 2014 and considered capital adequate for Basel III requirements taking effect in 2015.

  • Interest-rate risk is material: the company’s sensitivity analysis estimated net interest income changes of +1.0% for a 100-basis-point rise and -3.8% for a 100-basis-point decline; estimated portfolio equity value changes were +5.7% and -14.8%, respectively.
  • Credit risks include commercial and real-estate exposures; the 25 largest credits represented 26.5% of loans. Allowance adequacy depends on estimates and judgments, and management cautioned that different actual outcomes could require additional provision.
  • Outstanding commitments to extend credit were approximately $172.1 million, with $12.1 million of standby letters of credit. Management did not expect these commitments or routine legal claims to have a material adverse effect.
  • Management reported no material legal proceedings against the company; the WCCA-related litigation is discussed as a business disruption and expense factor. Forward-looking statements are subject to economic, interest-rate, credit, regulatory, competitive, and other risks.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether WCCA client attrition and the related litigation stabilize, and whether further goodwill impairment or revenue losses occur.
  • Whether the announced expense savings and consulting recommendations are implemented, and whether realized savings exceed implementation and outsourcing costs.
  • Whether loan growth remains creditworthy and funded by core deposits, and whether credit losses or criticized loans rise from current levels.
  • How net interest margin, deposit pricing, and borrowing costs respond to rate changes, including the stated interest-rate sensitivity estimates.
  • Whether liquidity, capital ratios, and dividend capacity remain adequate as balance-sheet growth continues and Basel III rules take effect.