Walmart Inc. quarterly report, Q2 FY2010

Walmart Inc. (then Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) — Form 10-Q

Business context and reporting period. Quarterly period ended July 31, 2009, the second quarter of Walmart’s fiscal 2010; six-month figures cover the first half of fiscal 2010. The filing is unaudited. Amounts are U.S. dollars unless noted; financial statement amounts below are in billions, except per-share data.

Financial performance

MetricQ2 FY2010Q2 FY2009First half FY2010First half FY2009
Net sales$100.08$101.55$193.55$195.59
Operating income$5.88$5.81$11.10$11.13
Income from continuing operations attributable to Walmart$3.45$3.40$6.48$6.43
Net income attributable to Walmart$3.44$3.45$6.46$6.47
Diluted EPS from continuing operations$0.88$0.86$1.65$1.62
Diluted net EPS$0.88$0.87$1.65$1.63
Gross margin24.9%24.1%24.8%24.1%
  • Q2 net sales fell 1.4%; operating income rose 1.2%. For the first half, sales declined 1.0% and operating income declined 0.3%. Net income attributable to Walmart was nearly flat in both comparisons.
  • Management attributed lower sales mainly to unfavorable currency movements, deflation in some categories, and lower fuel prices. Currency movements reduced International segment sales by $4.2 billion in Q2 and $9.0 billion in the first half.
  • Q2 U.S. comparable sales, including fuel, declined 1.5%; Walmart U.S. comparable sales fell 1.0%, while Sam’s Club comparable sales fell 4.0%. Walmart U.S. operating income increased 5.0% in Q2; International and Sam’s Club operating income declined 6.2% and 5.0%, respectively.
  • Higher gross margins reflected merchandising and inventory-management improvements, especially in Walmart U.S. and Sam’s Club. Operating expenses as a share of sales rose 0.8 percentage points in Q2, with management citing lower sales, higher health-benefit costs, and technology and systems spending.

Cash flow, balance sheet and capital

  • First-half operating cash flow was $9.90 billion, versus $10.16 billion a year earlier. Capital spending was $5.74 billion, up from $5.07 billion; reported free cash flow was $4.15 billion, down from $5.09 billion.
  • Cash and equivalents were $8.00 billion at July 31, 2009. Current assets were $49.03 billion and current liabilities $57.20 billion, an $8.17 billion working-capital deficit; the current ratio was 0.9. Management said the deficit was generally consistent with its operating and shareholder-return model.
  • Total debt, including capital-lease obligations, was $45.24 billion; debt-to-total-capitalization was 40.3%, compared with 39.3% at January 31, 2009. Long-term debt due within one year was $6.96 billion. The company issued £1.0 billion of 2034 notes, $1.0 billion of 2014 notes, and $500 million of 2038 notes during the half.
  • First-half financing included $2.79 billion of share repurchases and $2.13 billion of dividends paid. The annual fiscal 2010 dividend was raised 15% to $1.09 per share. A new $15 billion share-repurchase authorization replaced the prior program.
  • Management expected operating cash flows and short-term borrowing capacity to fund seasonal inventory and other cash needs, with debt financing available if needed. Free cash flow is a company-defined non-GAAP measure and excludes debt service and other contractual obligations.

Outlook, risks and unusual items

  • Management expected a fiscal 2010 annual effective tax rate of approximately 34%–35%. Unrecognized tax benefits related to continuing operations were $934 million; management said audit resolutions could reduce these by $330 million–$410 million over the next 12 months, without an expected significant effect on the tax rate.
  • A separate $1.7 billion unrecognized tax benefit relates to a claimed deduction from the disposition of German operations and is presented as relating to discontinued operations. Management believed the matter could be resolved within 12 months.
  • Wage-and-hour litigation remained a material uncertainty. Settlements covering 63 cases could require $352 million–$640 million, subject to court approval and claims; a separate California settlement could require $77 million–$152 million. The company said it could not reasonably estimate potential losses for several other cases, including the Dukes gender-discrimination class action.
  • Hazardous-materials investigations were ongoing in several jurisdictions. Management did not expect these matters to materially affect financial condition or results, but outcomes were uncertain. A Pennsylvania wastewater matter was settled for $400,000.
  • Japan’s Seiyu restructuring was reported in discontinued operations; the company recorded after-tax losses of $7 million for Q2 and $15 million for the first half. No material change to the risks disclosed in the prior 10-K was reported. Currency, economic conditions, consumer spending, labor and health costs, litigation, tax matters, and interest rates were among the stated risks.
  • No specific sales or earnings guidance was provided in the supplied filing text. The filing cautions that interim results are not necessarily indicative of full-year results.

Key facts investors should verify

  • Whether sales trends, comparable-store performance, and currency effects improved after the quarter, particularly in International and Sam’s Club.
  • Whether gross-margin gains can offset higher operating expenses, health-benefit costs, and planned technology spending.
  • Cash-flow conversion and capital spending, alongside the working-capital deficit, near-term debt maturities, and shareholder returns.
  • Developments and recognized liabilities in wage-and-hour litigation, the Dukes case, and the German tax matter; settlement amounts remain conditional or uncertain.
  • Actual fiscal 2010 tax rate relative to management’s 34%–35% expectation and any resolution of tax audits.