Hess Midstream LP quarterly report, Q1 FY2020

Hess Midstream LP — Q1 2020 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Three months ended March 31, 2020. Financial amounts are in millions of dollars unless otherwise stated. Hess Midstream owns and operates Bakken-area gathering, processing and storage, and terminaling and export assets. Its results are unaudited. The 2019 comparison was retrospectively adjusted for the December 2019 acquisition of Hess Infrastructure Partners (HIP); the restructuring also changed the public entity’s ownership structure.

Financial and operating results

MetricQ1 2020Q1 2019
Total revenue$290.8$189.6
Income from operations$152.8$95.8
Consolidated net income$129.0$80.8
Net income attributable to Hess Midstream LP$6.5$18.1
Net income per Class A share$0.37 basic; $0.35 dilutedNot directly comparable; prior structure reported $0.32 per common and subordinated unit
Net cash from operating activities$140.2$101.8
Adjusted EBITDA$195.3$129.4
Distributable cash flow$170.3Not directly comparable after restructuring
Free cash flow$138.3$95.0

Revenue rose about 53%, reflecting higher throughput, tariff rates and pass-through costs. Consolidated net income increased, but income attributable to Hess Midstream LP declined, chiefly reflecting the post-restructuring allocation of earnings to noncontrolling interests. Approximately 93.7% of the Partnership interest was held by Hess and GIP. Adjusted EBITDA, distributable cash flow and free cash flow are non-GAAP measures and should not be treated as substitutes for GAAP results or cash flows.

Throughput increased year over year: gas processing 36%, gas gathering 35%, crude oil gathering 34%, crude oil terminaling 34% and water gathering 64%. Management attributed the increases primarily to Hess production growth and completion of the Little Missouri 4 (LM4) processing plant ramp-up.

Liquidity, debt and capital

  • At March 31, 2020, cash was $3.1; total assets were $3,314.5 and total liabilities were $1,974.1. Current assets were $113.2 versus current liabilities of $145.8.
  • Total debt carrying value was $1,814.6. Debt included $800.0 of 5.625% senior notes due 2026, $550.0 of 5.125% senior notes due 2028, a fully drawn $400.0 Term Loan A and $92.0 drawn under a $1,000.0 revolving facility. The revolver’s nominal unused capacity was $908.0 before any letters of credit or other availability constraints.
  • The Partnership reported compliance with its debt covenants. The credit facilities require total debt/EBITDA of no more than 5.00 to 1.00 (with specified acquisition-related relief) and, before investment-grade ratings, secured debt/EBITDA of no more than 4.00 to 1.00.
  • Operating cash flow was $140.2; investing cash outflow was $78.1, including $78.1 of additions to property, plant and equipment; financing cash outflow was $62.3. Cash declined $0.2 during the quarter.
  • Capital expenditures reported on an accrual basis were $57.0: $55.3 expansion and $1.7 maintenance. The difference from cash additions to property, plant and equipment reflects changes in accrued capital expenditures and related liabilities.
  • The board declared a $0.4310-per-Class A share quarterly distribution on April 23, payable May 14, 2020. The quarter’s cash-flow statement includes $7.6 of distributions to shareholders and $113.4 to noncontrolling interests.

Material changes, outlook and risks

  • Operating and maintenance expense rose to $91.9 from $54.3, including higher pass-through rail, water trucking and disposal, electricity, LM4 processing and maintenance costs. Net interest expense rose to $24.8 from $15.0, primarily due to debt issued in connection with the restructuring and higher credit-facility borrowings.
  • COVID-19 and the sharp oil-demand and price decline prompted Hess to reduce its Bakken rig count from six to one by the end of May 2020; third-party producers also began curtailing production and drilling. Management said minimum-volume commitments and annual fee recalculation mechanisms were expected to cushion volume declines, but revenues above minimum commitments could fall.
  • In March, the company reduced its 2020 expansion capital program by 20% and its 2021 program by 55%, citing fewer expected well connections and deferred or cancelled compression work. It also lowered its targeted annualized distribution growth rate from 15% to 5%, with growth targeted through 2022.
  • The Tioga Gas Plant expansion—150 MMcf/d of additional capacity, for expected total capacity of 400 MMcf/d and estimated capital expenditures of approximately $150 million—was reported on schedule for service by mid-2021.
  • Substantially all revenue and accounts receivable—approximately 100%—were attributable to Hess, including third-party volumes contracted through Hess. This concentration creates counterparty and activity exposure despite the fee-based contracts.
  • Management said available cash, operating cash flow and financing sources were expected to meet operating needs, planned short-term capital spending, debt service and distributions. This is forward-looking and subject to COVID-19, production, market, financing and project risks.
  • The filing reported no material accrued legal-contingency liabilities and stated known legal matters were considered unlikely to materially harm financial condition, results or cash flows. Environmental remediation reserves were $2.9 in total at March 31, 2020.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether Hess’s reduced drilling and production, and third-party curtailments, affect volumes or revenues beyond contractual minimums.
  • Hess’s ability to meet its obligations and the practical protection provided by minimum-volume commitments and fee recalculation provisions.
  • Debt covenant headroom, revolver availability, interest costs and access to capital under stressed market conditions.
  • Execution, cost and timing of the Tioga expansion and the reduced 2020–2021 capital plans.
  • The distribution-growth target and capacity to sustain distributions, considering the lower 5% growth target and allocation between Class A holders and noncontrolling interests.
  • Comparability of per-share earnings and distributable cash flow across periods, given the HIP acquisition, restructuring and retrospective recast.