LSB INDUSTRIES, INC. quarterly report, Q1 FY2019

LSB Industries, Inc. — Q1 2019 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Three months ended March 31, 2019; financial statements are unaudited. LSB manufactures and sells agricultural, industrial and mining chemicals from facilities in Arkansas, Alabama, Oklahoma and Texas.

Financial results and position

MetricQ1 2019Q1 2018 / prior balance
Net sales$94.2 million$100.5 million
Gross profit / margin$7.3 million / 7.8%$10.1 million / 10.0%
Operating income$0.1 million$1.9 million
Net loss$11.5 million$5.6 million
Loss attributable to common stockholders / per share$19.4 million / $0.69$13.6 million / $0.49
Net cash from operating activities$7.1 million$1.2 million
Capital expenditures$7.1 million$6.2 million
Cash and cash equivalents$21.7 million$26.0 million at Dec. 31, 2018
Total debt, including current portion, net$425.2 million$425.2 million at Dec. 31, 2018
Series E redeemable preferred carrying value$209.9 million; $219 million liquidation preference$202.2 million carrying value at Dec. 31, 2018

Operating cash flow exceeded the net loss, aided by depreciation and amortization and working-capital movements, including accrued interest. Cash declined $4.3 million during the quarter after investing and financing outflows. The company reported $40.1 million of revolver availability and no springing financial-covenant trigger as of March 31. Current assets were $141.5 million and current liabilities $105.7 million.

Changes versus the prior-year quarter

  • Sales fell 6%, with agricultural revenue down 10% and industrial and mining revenue down 2%. Agricultural volume declined 24%, mainly amid weather-related planting delays and flooding; higher fertilizer selling prices partly offset the volume decline.
  • Industrial and mining adjusted gross profit by market declined 24%, while agricultural adjusted gross profit rose 37%. Overall gross profit fell 27%; reported gross margin contracted 2.2 percentage points.
  • Management attributed gross-profit pressure in part to about $1.0 million of higher freight costs to move product into storage and $0.9 million of higher natural-gas costs. SG&A decreased $1.1 million, primarily from lower compensation costs.
  • Net interest expense rose 18% to $11.0 million, primarily reflecting the 9.625% senior secured notes issued in 2018. The prior-year period included a $0.9 million non-operating gain; Q1 2019 recorded $0.2 million of non-operating expense, primarily reflecting the preferred-stock embedded derivative’s fair-value change.

Outlook, commentary and risks

  • Management said adverse Midwest weather, Mississippi-region flooding and saturated fields delayed planting and fertilizer application; challenging weather continued into Q2. Higher agricultural product prices versus a year earlier were offset by high supply-chain inventories expected to challenge near-term pricing. Management expected the fertilizer-price improvement seen from late 2017 through Q1 2019 to continue through the rest of 2019.
  • For the remainder of 2019, planned capital spending is $23–$28 million, for approximately $30–$35 million for the year, mainly for reliability and maintenance. A new El Dorado sulfuric acid converter is planned for Q4 at an estimated $7.5 million. Management believes cash, revolver availability and operating cash flow will cover anticipated liquidity needs for the next 12 months.
  • Management expects procurement and logistics initiatives to reduce expenses and capital spending by $3–$5 million on an annualized basis over the next 12–24 months. It also highlighted efforts to improve plant reliability, safety, product distribution, sales margins and capital structure; results are not assured.
  • El Dorado and Pryor turnarounds are scheduled for Q3 2019. Management’s 2019 ammonia-plant on-stream-rate targets are 95% at Cherokee, 95% at El Dorado and 90% at Pryor.
  • Natural gas averaged $2.91 per MMBtu, versus $2.79 a year earlier. Exposure includes volatile fertilizer and chemical prices, natural-gas and freight costs, weather and seasonality, plant downtime, and variable-rate debt. The company does not generally use commodity derivatives to manage these risks.
  • Environmental matters include ongoing wastewater-permit and groundwater matters; accrued environmental liabilities were $183,000. Estimated environmental project expenses are $3.4–$3.8 million for the remainder of 2019. The company cannot currently estimate potential additional remediation costs at El Dorado.
  • Litigation includes continuing claims related to the 2013 West Fertilizer explosion, for which the company said it could not estimate a possible loss range. The approximately $18.5 million Wilson securities-litigation settlement was paid by insurers in March 2019, subject to a court settlement hearing scheduled for June 28, 2019. The Global Industrial dispute also remains pending; approximately $3.5 million of disputed invoices are included in accounts payable.
  • LSB adopted ASC 842 lease accounting on January 1, 2019, adding $15.9 million of right-of-use assets and associated lease liabilities at adoption. Management estimated 2019 valuation allowances of approximately $8.3 million for federal and $3.8 million for state deferred tax assets.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether delayed planting and continued poor weather affect Q2 sales volumes, inventory levels and fertilizer pricing.
  • Progress on plant reliability and scheduled 2019 turnarounds, including whether on-stream-rate targets are achieved.
  • Liquidity and debt-service capacity, including the June 2019 secured-note balloon payment, revolver availability and the cost of the 9.625% notes.
  • Series E preferred economics: 14% cumulative dividends, approximately $79.6 million of accumulated dividends, and a $219 million liquidation preference; verify the effect on common-stock value and future cash obligations.
  • Outcomes and potential costs of the West Fertilizer and Global Industrial litigation, environmental matters, and the Wilson settlement’s final court approval.
  • Actual 2019 capital spending, environmental costs, tax valuation allowances and delivery of the projected procurement savings.