SAIA INC quarterly report, Q2 FY2013

Saia, Inc. — Q2 2013 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013. Saia provides less-than-truckload, non-asset truckload, expedited and logistics services across the United States. Amounts below are in millions except per-share data and operating statistics.

Financial performance

MetricQ2 2013Q2 2012Six months 2013Six months 2012
Operating revenue$292.6$287.5$566.4$556.2
Operating income$23.3$21.2$37.8$32.2
Net income$13.5$11.9$22.7$17.4
Diluted EPS$0.54$0.48$0.90$0.70
Operating ratio92.0%92.6%Not statedNot stated
Cash from operationsSix-month cash flow: $32.0 in 2013 vs. $50.3 in 2012

Q2 revenue rose 1.7%; LTL tonnage per workday fell 1.6%, shipments declined 0.9%, and revenue per hundredweight increased 3.2% to $14.16. For the first half, revenue increased 1.8%. Management attributed growth mainly to higher yield, partly offset by lower tonnage. Q2 operating income improved 9.8%; the lower operating ratio indicates improved operating efficiency. Q2 interest expense was $1.6 versus $2.2, and the effective tax rate was 37.7%. First-half 2013 tax rate was 34.8%, including $1.0 of credits recognized for 2012.

Financial position, liquidity and debt

  • At June 30, cash was $2.9; working capital was $19.8, compared with $9.8 at June 30, 2012.
  • Total debt was $99.0, up from $60.7 at December 31, 2012; debt fair value was estimated at $100.6. Debt included $59.4 under the revolver and $39.6 in senior notes.
  • The amended revolving credit facility was increased from $150 to $200, extended to June 2018, and has a further $40 accordion feature subject to lender approval. Borrowings were $59.4 and letters of credit were $59.1 at quarter-end; reported available line of credit was $81.5.
  • The company reported compliance with debt covenants at June 30. The facility has leverage, fixed-charge-coverage and tangible-net-worth covenants; borrowing-base provisions can apply if leverage exceeds 3-to-1.
  • First-half investing cash outflow was $70.8, primarily for property and equipment; financing provided $41.4. Net capital expenditures were projected at approximately $90 for 2013, with about $11 of the remaining budget committed at June 30.

Material changes and management outlook

  • Profit and EPS increased year over year, while LTL tonnage and shipments declined. Higher yield and cost optimization helped performance; purchased transportation costs fell, partly reflecting network optimization and more in-house miles.
  • Operating cash flow declined $18.3 year over year, which management attributed largely to working-capital fluctuations, particularly higher accounts receivable from seasonal revenue growth. Capital spending timing also differed from the prior year.
  • On July 1, 2013, Saia implemented a 5.9% general rate increase for customers representing approximately 30% of operating revenue. Management said customer-specific negotiations apply to the other approximately 70%.
  • A July 1, 2013 employee wage and salary increase is estimated to cost approximately $13 annually, expected to be partly offset by productivity and efficiency gains. Management plans to pursue yield, revenue density, cost control, safety and service initiatives; it gave no earnings guidance.
  • Management cited uncertainty in economic recovery and exposure to competitive pricing, volume trends, driver and purchased-transportation availability, fuel, insurance costs, regulation, labor relations and execution of improvement initiatives. Fuel surcharges mitigate, but may not fully offset, fuel-price changes.

Contingencies and other notable items

Saia is subject to ordinary-course legal proceedings and said provisions were made for probable losses. Management stated outcomes are not expected to materially affect consolidated financial position but could materially affect results in a quarter or year. Saia also remains responsible for certain pre-2006 Jevic self-insured claims under indemnity and settlement arrangements. Unrecognized tax benefits were approximately $1.3, with $1.4 of accrued interest and penalties; settlement timing beyond one year could not be estimated. A three-for-two stock split was effected in June 2013; reported share and EPS figures were retroactively adjusted. Management reported effective disclosure controls and no material change in internal control over financial reporting.

Key facts for investors to verify

  • Whether yield gains and July’s rate increase can offset weaker shipment and tonnage trends amid competitive pricing.
  • Whether working-capital needs and the planned 2013 capital program can be funded while maintaining liquidity and covenant compliance.
  • How the $13 annual wage-cost estimate and other operating-cost pressures compare with realized productivity gains.
  • The ultimate amount and timing of self-insurance, Jevic-related, legal and tax contingencies.
  • The detailed terms and covenants of the amended credit and note agreements, including availability after letters of credit and any borrowing-base restrictions.