TEXTRON INC quarterly report, Q3 FY2020

Textron Inc. — Form 10-Q Summary

Period clarification: The request identifies 2019 Q3, but the supplied filing is for the quarter ended October 3, 2020, with comparisons to 2019. This summary reflects the filing provided.

Business context and reporting period

Textron operates Textron Aviation, Bell, Textron Systems, Industrial and Finance. The filing covers the third quarter and first nine months of 2020. Management attributed widespread disruption and weaker commercial demand to COVID-19, although commercial demand generally improved in the third quarter versus the first half. Substantially all manufacturing activities had resumed by the second quarter.

Financial performance and liquidity

  • Third quarter: Revenue was $2.735 billion, down 16% year over year. Net income was $115 million versus $220 million; diluted EPS was $0.50 versus $0.95. Income before taxes was $116 million, and the effective tax rate was 0.9%.
  • First nine months: Revenue was $7.984 billion, down 17%. Net income was $73 million versus $616 million; diluted EPS was $0.32 versus $2.64. Income before taxes was $67 million, and the effective tax rate was negative 9.0%.
  • Margins: Manufacturing gross margin as a percentage of manufacturing revenue was 14.3% for the quarter versus 15.3% a year earlier, and 12.2% year to date versus 16.6%. Year-to-date pressure reflected lower Textron Aviation performance, idle-facility costs and the TRU inventory charge.
  • Segments: Third-quarter revenue and segment profit were $795 million and a $29 million loss at Textron Aviation; $793 million and $119 million at Bell; $302 million and $40 million at Textron Systems; and $832 million and $58 million at Industrial. Year to date, Textron Aviation recorded a $92 million segment loss and Industrial profit fell to $56 million from $173 million. Bell’s year-to-date profit rose to $352 million from $317 million.
  • Cash flow: Nine-month consolidated operating cash flow was $199 million, versus $223 million; investing cash outflow was $92 million versus $183 million; financing cash inflow was $1.208 billion versus an $88 million outflow. The filing’s MD&A reports $200 million of operating cash flow from continuing operations. Capital expenditures were $151 million versus $216 million.
  • Liquidity and debt: Cash and equivalents totaled $2.670 billion across the groups at October 3, 2020, versus $1.357 billion at the start of the year. Manufacturing-group debt was $4.058 billion; its net-debt-to-capital ratio was 21%, versus 26% at January 4, 2020. Finance-group debt was $666 million. Textron said it expected sufficient cash from existing balances, manufacturing operations and its available credit facility.
  • Other indicators: Backlog was $9.385 billion, down from $9.827 billion at January 4, 2020. The company expected to recognize approximately 65% of its $9.4 billion remaining performance obligations through 2021, a further 27% through 2023, and the balance thereafter.

Material changes versus the prior comparable period

  • Lower aircraft and aftermarket demand drove much of the decline: Textron Aviation’s third-quarter revenue fell 34%, while nine-month revenue fell 30%. Deliveries of Citation jets and commercial turboprops were also substantially lower year to date.
  • Industrial’s nine-month revenue fell 26%, reflecting pandemic-related facility closures and weaker volume and mix. Bell’s nine-month revenue grew 6%, primarily on higher military business; Textron Systems revenue grew 3%.
  • Year-to-date results included $124 million of special charges and a separate $55 million TRU inventory charge in cost of sales. No special charges were recorded in the first nine months of 2019.
  • Finance receivable credit indicators weakened: nonaccrual receivables rose to $58 million, or 8.00% of receivables, from $39 million, or 5.52%, at year-end. Receivables 60 or more days delinquent increased to $33 million from $17 million.

Outlook, risks, contingencies and unusual items

  • Textron provided no overall earnings or revenue guidance in the supplied filing. It said COVID-19 would continue to adversely affect the business, but the duration and severity were not reasonably estimable. Management expected abnormally low Textron Aviation production and additional idle-facility costs through the remainder of 2020.
  • The COVID-19 restructuring plan was expected to cost $125 million to $145 million pre-tax, of which $85 million had been recorded. The plan targeted approximately 2,800 job reductions, or 8% of the workforce, and was expected to be substantially complete in the first half of 2021. The company ceased manufacturing commercial air-transport simulators at TRU’s Montreal facility; the related inventory write-down was $55 million.
  • A state tax audit settlement agreement reached October 19, 2020 was expected to reduce fourth-quarter tax expense by approximately $40 million to $50 million.
  • COVID-19 risks include further demand declines, order delays or cancellations, lower aircraft utilization and aftermarket demand, supply-chain and workforce disruption, increased operating costs, and pressure on customers’ ability to pay. Finance receivable collections and collateral recovery are also risks if economic conditions persist or worsen.
  • A shareholder securities lawsuit concerning the Arctic Cat acquisition and integration was dismissed, but plaintiffs appealed; the appeal remained pending. Textron stated that existing proceedings were not expected to materially affect financial position or results, based on information then available.
  • Management said it expected to reactivate share repurchases opportunistically in the fourth quarter. It also reported that disclosure controls were effective as of October 3, 2020.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Confirm the intended reporting period: the supplied filing is for 2020 Q3, not 2019 Q3.
  • Track recovery in Textron Aviation deliveries, aftermarket activity and margins, plus ongoing idle-facility costs.
  • Monitor restructuring charges, cash payments, job reductions and the effects of the TRU production suspension.
  • Review Finance segment delinquencies, nonaccrual balances, loan modifications and the adequacy of the credit-loss allowance.
  • Assess whether backlog conversion, customer demand and operating cash generation support the company’s liquidity outlook.
  • Check the fourth-quarter tax benefit and the status and potential implications of the pending lawsuit appeal.