GEO GROUP INC quarterly report, Q2 FY2019

Business context and reporting period

The GEO Group, Inc. is a REIT providing secure correctional and processing facilities, reentry and community services, electronic monitoring, and related services. This unaudited Form 10-Q covers the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2019; comparisons are with the same 2018 periods. At quarter-end, GEO reported approximately 97,000 beds at 133 facilities and community supervision services for more than 210,000 individuals.

Financial performance and condition

MetricQ2 2019Q2 2018First half 2019First half 2018
Revenue$614.0 million$583.5 million$1,224.6 million$1,148.4 million
Operating income$81.2 million$67.0 million$156.0 million$131.4 million
Net income attributable to GEO$41.9 million$37.4 million$82.6 million$72.4 million
Diluted EPS$0.35$0.31$0.69$0.60
  • Q2 revenue rose 5.2%; operating income rose 21.2%. Operating margin was approximately 13.2%, versus 11.5% a year earlier. First-half revenue rose 6.6% and operating income rose 18.7%.
  • Q2 segment revenue increased 8.3% in GEO Secure Services and 3.7% in GEO Care; International Services declined 15.8%, principally reflecting the Parklea contract transition and foreign exchange. First-half segment trends were similar.
  • First-half operating cash flow was $217.1 million, up from $180.3 million. Investing used $49.2 million, including $55.4 million of capital expenditures; financing used $173.6 million, including $116.1 million of dividends.
  • Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash totaled $79.6 million at June 30, 2019, versus $127.2 million at June 30, 2018. Balance-sheet cash and cash equivalents alone were $21.6 million; restricted amounts are not all freely available.
  • Total debt, including non-recourse debt and finance leases, was $2.704 billion, compared with $2.749 billion at December 31, 2018. The company had approximately $782 million of term-loan borrowings, $452 million drawn on its $900 million revolver, and $386 million of additional revolver capacity after letters of credit.
  • Quarterly declared dividends were $0.48 per share, versus $0.47 in Q2 2018. First-half dividends paid were $116.1 million. GEO reported Q2 Normalized FFO of $66.6 million and AFFO of $83.4 million; these are non-GAAP measures.

Material changes versus prior comparable period

  • Growth was led by federal-client populations, transportation services and contract activations, including Eagle Pass and Montgomery. GEO Secure Services average occupancy, excluding idle facilities, was 96.2% in Q2 versus 95.3% a year earlier; company-wide first-half occupancy was 93.3% versus 92.3%.
  • International Services revenue was pressured by the March 2019 transition of Parklea to a new operator and adverse currency movements. GEO also reported that Queensland planned to transition Arthur Gorrie to government operation between late 2019 and Q1 2020.
  • Interest expense increased 7.1% in Q2 and 9.7% in the first half. A $5.7 million first-half debt-extinguishment loss—$4.5 million related to Ravenhall refinancing and $1.2 million related to the credit-agreement amendment—was substantially above the prior-year amount.
  • First-half capital expenditures were lower than the prior year ($55.4 million versus $107.1 million); operating cash flow improved. The 2019 cash-flow comparison also includes large offsetting Ravenhall non-recourse debt proceeds and repayments.

Outlook, management commentary, risks and unusual items

  • Management said cash on hand, operating cash flows and credit-facility availability should support 2019 capital requirements. It estimated $44 million of remaining spending through year-end on committed capital projects, after $129 million spent through June.
  • Management cited new or expanded work: North Lake’s 1,800-bed BOP contract was expected to add about $37 million in annualized revenue; South Louisiana’s reactivation about $25 million; and Montgomery’s 314-bed expansion about $10 million. Ravenhall’s proposed 300-bed expansion, estimated at $19 million of annualized revenue, remained under negotiation.
  • GEO was marketing about 2,300 vacant beds at three idle facilities. Management estimated annual carrying costs of $11.5 million. It stated that activation of all three, at assumed average rates and occupancy, could add about $55 million in annualized revenue and $0.05–$0.10 to annualized EPS; there was no firm activation commitment.
  • The revolver matures in May 2024 after amendment. Ravenhall was refinanced with amortizing non-recourse notes due 2042 at a 4.23% coupon. Variable-rate exposure remains material: management estimated a 1 percentage-point increase in applicable credit-facility rates would raise annual interest expense by about $13 million.
  • Management estimated a 9%–11% annual effective tax rate, excluding discrete items. Future dividends remain at the board’s discretion and depend on cash flows, REIT requirements and debt restrictions.
  • Risks include government budgets and demand for public-private partnerships, contract losses or non-renewals, facility activation and start-up costs, high debt and refinancing needs, foreign-exchange and interest-rate exposure, and litigation or uninsured claims. GEO disclosed class actions and government suits over detainee work-program wages and related allegations; no accrual was recorded because loss was not considered probable or reasonably estimable. A separate state non-income-tax assessment was approximately $18.6 million, for which GEO had established a reserve; the reserve amount is not stated here.
  • Adoption of the lease accounting standard added operating lease assets and liabilities to the balance sheet (approximately $140 million and $147 million, respectively, at adoption); 2018 comparatives were not restated. Management reported disclosure controls were effective and no material change in internal control over financial reporting.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether announced contract activations and expansions begin on schedule and deliver the stated incremental revenue, particularly North Lake, South Louisiana, Montgomery and the proposed Ravenhall expansion.
  • The timing and financial impact of the Parklea transition and Queensland’s planned Arthur Gorrie transition, as well as GEO’s ability to fill or repurpose idle beds.
  • Debt service capacity, covenant headroom, revolver availability and the effect of variable rates; distinguish restricted cash and non-recourse debt from corporate liquidity and debt.
  • Cash conversion and capital needs, including remaining committed project spending, dividends and any future buybacks; reconcile non-GAAP FFO/AFFO with GAAP results.
  • Developments in detainee wage litigation and the state tax assessment, including whether either becomes probable, estimable or otherwise materially affects results.